1887

Abstract

In 2014, Rahkila transferred to as subsp. comb. nov. based on a 75 % DNA–DNA hybridization value. In the present study, the taxonomic status of subsp. is re-evaluated by a polyphasic approach, including 16S rRNA, , , , and gene sequence analyses, phylogenomic treeing, analyses of ANI (average nucleotide identity) and dDDH (digital DNA–DNA hybridization), fatty acid methyl ester analysis and a phenotypic characterization. On the basis of the ANI and dDDH values, we propose to reject the proposal of Rahkila to reclassify as subsp. gasicomitatum

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • national natural science foundation of china (Award no. 31471594)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ChunTao Gu
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005027
2021-09-22
2021-10-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Björkroth KJ, Geisen R, Schillinger U, Weiss N, De Vos P et al. Characterization of Leuconostoc gasicomitatum sp. nov., associated with spoiled raw tomato-marinated broiler meat strips packaged under modified-atmosphere conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000; 66:3764–3772 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. International Union of of Microbiological Societies Validation list no.79. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:263–265
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Rahkila R, De Bruyne K, Johansson P, Vandamme P, Björkroth J. Reclassification of Leuconostoc gasicomitatum as Leuconostoc gelidum subsp. gasicomitatum comb. nov., description of Leuconostoc gelidum subsp. aenigmaticum subsp. nov., designation of Leuconostoc gelidum subsp. gelidum subsp. nov. and emended description of Leuconostoc gelidum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1290–1295 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Mattarelli P, Holzapfel W, Franz CMAP, Endo A, Felis GE et al. Recommended minimal standards for description of new taxa of the genera Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and related genera. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1434–1451 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gu CT, Li CY, Yang LJ, Huo GC. Lactobacillus heilongjiangensis sp. nov., isolated from Chinese pickle. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:4094–4099 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:4673–4680 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kishino H, Hasegawa M. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in hominoidea. J Mol Evol 1989; 29:170–179 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Li TT, Liu DD, Fu ML, Gu CT. Proposal of Lactobacillus kosoi Chiou et al. 2018 as a later heterotypic synonym of Lactobacillus micheneri McFrederick et al. 2018, elevation of Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. argentoratensis to the species level as Lactobacillus argentoratensis sp. nov., and Lactobacillus zhaodongensis sp. nov., isolated from traditional Chinese pickle and the intestinal tract of a honey bee (Apis mellifera). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3123–3133 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Li YQ, Gu CT. Proposal of Enterococcus xinjiangensis Ren et al. 2020 as a later heterotypic synonym of Enterococcus lactis Morandi et al. 2012. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:004716
    [Google Scholar]
  12. De Bruyne K, Schillinger U, Caroline L, Boehringer B, Cleenwerck I et al. Leuconostoc holzapfelii sp. nov., isolated from Ethiopian coffee fermentation and assessment of sequence analysis of housekeeping genes for delineation of Leuconostoc species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2952–2959 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Naser SM, Thompson FL, Hoste B, Gevers D, Dawyndt P et al. Application of multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) for rapid identification of Enterococcus species based on rpoA and pheS genes. Microbiology 2005; 151:2141–2150 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Naser SM, Dawyndt P, Hoste B, Gevers D, Vandemeulebroecke K et al. Identification of lactobacilli by pheS and rpoA gene sequence analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2777–2789 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. De Bruyne K, Franz CMAP, Vancanneyt M, Schillinger U, Mozzi F et al. Pediococcus argentinicus sp. nov. from Argentinean fermented wheat flour and identification of Pediococcus species by pheS, rpoA and atpA sequence analysis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:2909–2916 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Wu Y, Gu CT. Leuconostoc falkenbergense sp. nov., isolated from a lactic culture, fermentating string beans and traditional yogurt. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:004602
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Li YQ, Tian WL, Gu CT. Weissella sagaensis sp. nov., isolated from traditional Chinese yogurt. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2485–2492 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Coil D, Jospin G, Darling AE. A5-miseq: an updated pipeline to assemble microbial genomes from Illumina MiSeq data. Bioinformatics 2015; 31:587–589 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST server: Rapid annotations using Subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:75 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:1312–1313 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Davis JJ, Wattam AR, Aziz RK, Brettin T, Butler R et al. The PATRIC Bioinformatics Resource Center: Expanding data and analysis capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:D606–D612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park SC, Chun J. OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE, USA: Microbial ID Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Hahnke RL, Petersen J, Scheuner C, Michael V et al. Complete genome sequence of DSM 30083T, the type strain (U5/41T) of Escherichia coli, and a proposal for delineating subspecies in microbial taxonomy. Stand Genomic Sci 2014; 9:2 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005027
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005027
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error