1887

Abstract

Three Gram-positive bacterial strains, BML-BC004, BML-BC017 and BML-BC059, isolated from blood samples from three inpatients in Japan, were identified as members of using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight MS. The 16S rRNA gene sequences of these three strains were more than 97.1 % similar to 18 type strains belonging to the group. Whole-genome comparisons, using average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH), confirmed that the three strains represented three individual distinct species belonging to the group. A phylogenetic tree showed that BML-BC004, BML-BC017 and BML-BC059 were located close to , and , respectively. Based on these phylogenetic and phenotypic data, including values below the threshold for ANI and dDDH, the three strains should be classified as representing three different novel species of the group: sp. nov., with type strain BML-BC004 (=DSM 111102=JCM 34122), sp. nov., with type strain BML-BC017 (=DSM 111100=JCM 34124) and sp. nov., with type strain BML-BC059 (=DSM 111101=JCM 34125).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • japan agency for medical research and development (Award 20fk0108061h0303)
    • Principle Award Recipient: TeruoKirikae
  • japan society for the promotion of science (Award 19K16652)
    • Principle Award Recipient: MariTohya
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004993
2021-09-08
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Turnbull PCB. Chapter 15 Bacillus. Baron S. eds In Medical Microbiology, 4th. edn Galveston: University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston; 1996
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu Y, Du J, Lai Q, Zeng R, Ye D et al. Proposal of nine species of the Bacillus cereus group. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2499–2508 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Logan NA, Carman JA, Melling J, Berkeley RC. Identification of Bacillus anthracis by API tests. J Med Microbiol 1985; 20:75–85 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ramarao N, Sanchis V. The pore-forming haemolysins of Bacillus cereus: a review. Toxins (Basel) 2013; 5:1119–1139 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Guinebretière MH, Auger S, Galleron N, Contzen M, De Sarrau B et al. Bacillus cytotoxicus sp. nov. is a novel thermotolerant species of the Bacillus cereus Group occasionally associated with food poisoning. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:31–40 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu X, Wang L, Han M, Xue QH, Zhang GS et al. Bacillus fungorum sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from spent mushroom substrate. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:1457–1462 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Flugge C. Fie Mikroorganismen. Leipzig 1886Vogel
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Nakamura LK. Bacillus pseudomycoides sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1998; 48:1031–1035 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Nakamura LK. DNA relatedness among Bacillus thuringiensis serovars. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:125–129 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jiménez G, Urdiain M, Cifuentes A, López-López A, Blanch AR et al. Description of Bacillus toyonensis sp. nov., a novel species of the Bacillus cereus group, and pairwise genome comparisons of the species of the group by means of ANI calculations. Syst Appl Microbiol 2013; 36:383–391 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Miller RA, Beno SM, Kent DJ, Carroll LM, Martin NH et al. Bacillus wiedmannii sp. nov., a psychrotolerant and cytotoxic Bacillus cereus group species isolated from dairy foods and dairy environments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:4744–4753 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Tohya M, Watanabe S, Teramoto K, Shimojima M, Tada T et al. Pseudomonas juntendi sp. nov., isolated from patients in Japan and Myanmar. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:3377–3384 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Edwards U, Rogall T, Blöcker H, Emde M, Böttger C. Isolation and direct complete nucleotide determination of entire genes. Characterization of a gene coding for 16S ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res 1989; 17:7843–7853 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. mega7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kimura M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution Cambridge University Press; 1983 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gardner SN, Slezak T, Hall BG. kSNP3.0: SNP detection and phylogenetic analysis of genomes without genome alignment or reference genome. Bioinformatics 2015; 31:2877–2878 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Torres Manno MA, Repizo GD, Magni C, Dunlap CA, Espariz M. The assessment of leading traits in the taxonomy of the Bacillus cereus group. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2020; 113:2223–2242 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Bartholomew JW, Mittwer T. The Gram stain. Bacteriol Rev 1952; 16:1–29 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kovacs N. Identification of Pseudomonas pyocyanea by the oxidase reaction. Nature 1956; 178:703 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004993
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004993
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error