1887

Abstract

A novel cellulase-producing actinomycete, designated strain NEAU-H7, was isolated from coconut palm rhizosphere soil collected from Wenchang City, Hainan Province, PR China. A polyphasic taxonomic study was carried out to establish the status of this strain. Results of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis indicated that strain NEAU-H7 belonged to the genus , with highest similarity to NEAU-M9 (99.2 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity). The diagnostic sugars in cell hydrolysates were determined to be ribose, galactose and mannose. The major fatty acids (>10%) were C, C 9 and C. The predominant menaquinones were identified as MK-9(H) and MK-9(H). The major polar lipids were phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol and two phosphatidylinositol mannosides. The amino acid of the cell-wall peptidoglycan was determined to be -diaminopimelic acid. The DNA G+C content was 71.2 mol%. Phylogenetic analysis using 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that strain NEAU-H7 formed a stable phyletic line with NEAU-M9. However, whole-genome phylogeny showed strain NEAU-H7 formed a stable phyletic line with NEAU-M9 (99.2%), DSM 43148 (98.6%), DSM 44859 (98.3%) and DSM 43150 (97.6%). The digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) results between them were 53.6 (50.9–56.2), 54.1 (51.3–56.9), 53.1 (50.3–55.9) and 52.9 % (50.1–55.6 %), and whole-genome average nucleotide identity (ANI) values between them were 93.7, 93.6, 93.5 and 93.5 %. The low dDDH and ANI values demonstrated that strain NEAU-H7 could be distinguished from its reference strains. Moreover, genomic analysis indicated that the strain NEAU-H7 had the potential to decompose cellulose and produce bioactive compounds. On the basis of morphological, chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic characteristics, strain NEAU-H7 is proposed to represent a novel species of the genus , with the name sp. nov. The type strain is NEAU-H7 (=CCTCC AA 2020034=DSM 112042).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • “Academic Backbone” Project of Northeast Agricultural University (Award 19XG18)
    • Principle Award Recipient: SongJia
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 31972291)
    • Principle Award Recipient: WangXiangjing
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004990
2021-09-09
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Couch JN. Actinoplanes, a new genus of the Actinomycetales. J Elisha Mitchell Sci Soc 1950; 66:87–92
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Vobis G, Schäfer J, Kämpfer P. Actinoplanes. Whitman W. eds In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria Hoboken: Wiley; 2015 pp 1–41
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Goodfellow M, Stanton LJ, Simpson KE, Minnikin DE. Numerical and chemical classification of Actinoplanes and some related actinomycetes. J Gen Microbiol 1990; 136:19–36 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Tamura T, Hatano K. Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Actinoplanes and transfer of Actinoplanes minutisporangius Ruan et al. 1986 and ‘Actinoplanes aurantiacus’ to Cryptosporangium minutisporangium comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:2119–2125 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Parenti F, Coronelli C. Members of the genus Actinoplanes and their antibiotics. Annu Rev Microbiol 1979; 33:389–411 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Huang H, Ren S-X, Yang S, Hu H-F. Comparative analysis of rapamycin biosynthesis clusters between Actinoplanes sp. N902-109 and Streptomyces hygroscopicus ATCC 29253. Chin J Nat Med 2015; 13:90–98 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Aretz W, Meiwes J, Seibert G, Vobis G, Wink J. Friulimicins: novel lipopeptide antibiotics with peptidoglycan synthesis inhibiting activity from Actinoplanes friuliensis sp. nov. I. Taxonomic studies of the producing microorganism and fermentation. J Antibiot 2000; 53:807–815 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Coronelli C, White RJ, Lancini GC, Parenti F. Lipiarmycin, a new antibiotic from Actinoplanes. II. Isolation, chemical, biological and biochemical characterization. J Antibiot 1975; 28:253–259 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bardone MR, Paternoster M, Coronelli C. Teichomycins, new antibiotics from Actinoplanes teichomyceticus sp. nov. II. Extraction and chemical characterization. J Antibiot 1978; 31:170–177 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hayakawa M, Tamura T, Nonomura H. Selective isolation of Actinoplanes and Dactylosporangium from soil by using γ-collidine as the chemoattractant. J Ferment Bioengin 1991; 72:426–432 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu CX, Zhuang XX, Yu ZY, Wang ZY, Wang YJ et al. Community structures and antifungal activity of root-associated endophytic actinobacteria of healthy and diseased soybean. Microorganisms 2019; 7:243
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:313–340 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jin LY, Zhao Y, Song W, Duan LP, Jiang SW et al. Streptomyces inhibens sp. nov., a novel actinomycete isolated from rhizosphere soil of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:688–695 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Waksman SA. The Actinomycetes. A Summary of Current Knowledge New York: Ronald Press; 1967
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jones KL. Fresh isolates of actinomycetes in which the presence of sporogenous aerial mycelia is a fluctuating characteristic. J Bacteriol 1949; 57:141–145 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kelly KL. Inter-society Colour Council-national Bureau of Standards Colour-name Charts Illustrated with Centroid Colours Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1964
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jia FY, Liu CX, Wang XJ, Zhao JW, Liu QF et al. Wangella harbinensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the family Micromonosporaceae. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2013; 103:399–408 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Cao P, Li C, Tan K, Liu C, Xu X et al. Characterization, phylogenetic analyses, and pathogenicity of Enterobacter cloacae on rice seedlings in Heilongjiang Province, China. Plant Dis 2020; 104:1601–1609 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhao J, Han L, Yu M, Cao P, Li D et al. Characterization of Streptomyces sporangiiformans sp. nov., a novel soil Actinomycete with antibacterial activity against Ralstonia solanacearum. Microorganisms 2019; 7:360 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. Gerhardt P, Murray R, Wood W, Krieg N. eds In Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp 607–654
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gordon RE, Barnett DA, Handerhan JE. Nocardia autotrophica, and the nocardin strain. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1974; 24:54–63 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Yokota A, Tamura T, Hasegawa T, Huang LH. Catenuloplanes japonicas gen. nov., sp. nov., nom. rev., a new genus of the order Actinomycetales. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1993; 43:805–812 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Williams ST, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Wellington EMH, Sneath PHA et al. Numerical classifification of Streptomyces and related genera. J Gen Microbiol 1983; 129:1743–1813 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim ES, Kim BS, Kim KY, Woo HM, Lee SM et al. Aerobic and anaerobic cellulose utilization by Paenibacillus sp. CAA11 and enhancement of its cellulolytic ability by expressing a heterologous endoglucanase. J Biotechnol 2018; 268:21–27 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. McKerrow J, Vagg S, McKinney T, Seviour EM, Maszenan AM et al. A simple HPLC method for analysing diaminopimelic acid diastereomers in cell walls of Gram-positive bacteria. Lett Appl Microbiol 2000; 30:178–182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lechevalier MP, Lechevalier HA. The chemotaxonomy of actinomycetes. Dietz A, Thayer D. eds In Actinomycete Taxonomy Special Publication Vol 6 Arlington: Society of Industrial Microbiology; 1980 pp 227–291
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Collins MD. Isoprenoid quinone analyses in bacterial classification and identification. Goodfellow M, Minnikin D. eds In Chemical Methods in Bacterial Systematics London: Academic Press; 1985 pp 267–284
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Wu C, Lu X, Qin M, Wang Y, Ruan J. Analysis of menaquinone compound in microbial cells by HPLC. Microbiology 1989; 16:176–178
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Song J, Qiu SW, Zhao JW, Han CY, Ying W et al. Pseudonocardia tritici sp. nov., a novel actinomycete isolated from rhizosphere soil of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. Antonie <span data-cid="1628083285" id="04f57bdd-36d2-41b4-9dca-9a33e49bfc17" title="lowercase Added by Lavanya (PREEDITOR) - 08/4/2021 7 112:765–773 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Xiang W, Liu C, Wang X, Du J, Xi L et al. Actinoalloteichus nanshanensis sp. nov., isolated from the rhizosphere of a fig tree (Ficus religiosa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1165–1169 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Minnikin DE, Hutchinson IG, Caldicott AB, Goodfellow M. Thin-layer chromatography of methanolysates of mycolic acid-containing bacteria. J Chromatogr 1980; 188:221–233 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kim SB, Brown R, Oldfield C, Gilbert SC, Iliarionov S et al. Gordonia amicalis sp. nov., a novel dibenzothiophene-desulphurizing actinomycete. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:2031–2036 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA and whole genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Nikodinovic J, Barrow KD, Chuck JA. High yield preparation of genomic DNA from Streptomyces. Biotechniques 2003; 35:932–934 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Li R, Li Y, Kristiansen K, Wang J. SOAP: short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics 2008; 24:713–714 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Li R, Zhu H, Ruan J, Qian W, Fang X et al. De novo assembly of human genomes with massively parallel short read sequencing. Genome Res 2010; 20:265–272 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Goker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Henrissat B, Claeyssens M, Tomme P, Lemesle L, Mornon JP. Cellulase families revealed by hydrophobic cluster-analysis. Gene 1989; 81:83–95 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Awakawa T, Fujita N, Hayakawa M, Ohnishi Y, Horinouchi S. Characterization of the biosynthesis gene cluster for alkyl-O-dihydrogeranyl-methoxyhydroquinones in Actinoplanes missouriensis. Chembiochem 2011; 12:439–448 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Jonathan IT, Christopher JS, Parth SP, Tucker M, Patricia MB et al. A new genome-mining tool redefines the lasso peptide biosynthetic landscape. Nat Chem Biol 2017; 13:470–478 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O et al. International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37:463–464
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Richter M, Rossello-Mora R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Chun J, Rainey FA. Integrating genomics into the taxonomy and systematics of the Bacteria and Archaea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:316–324 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004990
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004990
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error