1887

Abstract

Two rod-shaped and Gram-stain-positive bacteria (strains C64 and C62) were isolated in 2020 from faeces of greater white-fronted geese () from Poyang Lake, PR China. Their optimal growth conditions were at 37 °C, pH 7.0 and with 0.5 % (w/v) NaCl. The two isolates showed a highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity to DSM 19116 (92.1 %). Phylogenetic/phylogenomic analyses indicated that strains C64 and C62 clustered independently in the vicinity of the genera , and within the family , but could not be classified clearly as members of any of these known genera. The average amino acid identity values between our isolates and available genomes of members of the family were around the genus threshold value (45–65 %). The major cellular fatty acids of the strains were Cω and C. The predominant polar lipids were phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylcholine, diacylglycerol, triacylglycerol and cardiolipin. The amino acid composition of peptidoglycan contained alanine, glutamic acid and glycine. The major respiratory menaquinones were MK-8(H) and MK-9(H). The whole cell sugars included galactose, arabinose and glucose. On the basis of the results of the 16S rRNA gene sequences comparison, whole-genome phylogenomic analysis, phenotypic and chemotaxonomic characteristics, we propose that strains C64 and C62 represent a novel species belonging to a novel genus within the family , for which the name gen. nov., sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is C64 (=CGMCC 1.18410=GDMCC 1.1969=KCTC 49511=KACC 22143).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Science Technology Major Project (Award 2018ZX10201001-006)
    • Principle Award Recipient: YanwenXiong
  • National Science Technology Major Project (Award 2018ZX10301407-002)
    • Principle Award Recipient: YanwenXiong
  • National Major Science and Technology Projects of China (Award 20201BBG71010)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ShengenChen
  • Independent Research Project of State Key Laboratory of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control (Award 2019SKLID311)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ShengenChen
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004978
2021-08-25
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Buchanan RE. Studies in the nomenclature and classification of the bacteria: VIII. The subgroups and genera of the Actinomycetales. J Bacteriol 1918; 3:403–406 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Nouioui I, Carro L, García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Woyke T et al. Genome-based taxonomic classification of the phylum Actinobacteria. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:2007 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Salam N, Jiao J-Y, Zhang X-T, Li W-J. Update on the classification of higher ranks in the phylum Actinobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:1331–1355 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Yassin A-A. The Family Actinomycetaceae. Rosenberg E, DeLong E, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F. eds In The Prokaryotes: Actinobacteria Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2014 pp 21–103
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu Q, Wu K, Fan G, Bai X, Yang X et al. Corynebacterium anserum sp. nov., isolated from the faeces of greater white-fronted geese (Anser albifrons) at Poyang Lake, PR China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Sambo F, Finotello F, Lavezzo E, Baruzzo G, Masi G et al. Optimizing PCR primers targeting the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene. BMC Bioinformatics 2018; 19:343 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Yarza P, Yilmaz P, Pruesse E, Glöckner FO, Ludwig W et al. Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nat Rev Microbiol 2014; 12:635–645 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:2947–2948 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhu W, Dong K, Yang J, Lu S, Lai X-H et al. Acinetobacter lanii sp. nov., Acinetobacter shaoyimingii sp. nov. and Acinetobacter wanghuae sp. nov., isolated from faeces of Equus kiang. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S et al. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep 2015; 5:8365 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA–DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park S-C, Chun J. OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Konstantinidis KT, Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy. ISME J 2017; 11:2399–2406 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hyatt D, Chen G-L, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW et al. Prodigal: Prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11:119 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhu W, Yang J, Lu S, Lai X-H, Jin D et al. Actinomyces qiguomingii sp. nov., isolated from the Pantholops hodgsonii. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:58–64 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hall V, Collins MD, Lawson PA, Hutson RA, Falsen E et al. Characterization of some actinomyces-like isolates from human clinical sources: description of Varibaculum cambriensis gen nov, sp nov. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41:640–644 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Glaeser SP, Doijad S, Hijazin M, Chakraborty T, Falsen E. Varibaculum anthropi sp. nov. represented by three genetically different genomovars isolated from clinical material and emended description of the genus Varibaculum. Syst Appl Microbiol 2016; 39:546–552 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Niang EHA, Lo CI, Brahimi S, Armstrong N, Raoult D et al. Varibaculum massiliense sp. nov., a new bacterium isolated from human urine with culturomics. New Microbes New Infect 2019; 32:100591 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lo CI, Niang EHA, Guilhot E, Raoult D, Fournier P-E et al. Varibaculum timonense sp. nov., a new bacterial species isolated from human stool sample. New Microbes New Infect 2019; 31:100575 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Spiegel CA, Roberts M. Mobiluncus gen. nov., Mobiluncus curtisii subsp. curtisii sp. nov., Mobiluncus curtisii subsp. holmesii subsp. nov., and Mobiluncus mulieris sp. nov., curved rods from the human vagina. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1984; 34:177–184 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Funke G, Stubbs S, von Graevenitz A, Collins MD. Assignment of human-derived CDC group 1 coryneform bacteria and CDC group 1-like coryneform bacteria to the genus Actinomyces as Actinomyces neuii subsp. neuii sp. nov., subsp. nov., and Actinomyces neuii subsp. anitratus subsp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:167–171 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hoyles L, Collins MD, Falsen E, Nikolaitchouk N, McCartney AL. Transfer of members of the genus Falcivibrio to the genus Mobiluncus, and emended description of the genus Mobiluncus. Syst Appl Microbiol 2004; 27:72–83 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hoyles L, Falsen E, Foster G, Collins MD. Actinomyces coleocanis sp. nov., from the vagina of a dog. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:1201–1203 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Funke G, Alvarez N, Pascual C, Falsen E, Akervall E et al. Actinomyces europaeus sp. nov., isolated from human clinical specimens. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1997; 47:687–692 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Funke G, Englert R, Frodl R, Bernard KA, Stenger S. Actinomyces hominis sp. nov., isolated from a wound swab. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:1678–1681 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hoyles L, Falsen E, Foster G, Pascual C, Greko C. Actinomyces canis sp. nov., isolated from dogs. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:1547–1551 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hall V, Collins MD, Hutson R, Falsen E, Duerden BI. Actinomyces cardiffensis sp. nov from human clinical sources. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40:3427–3431 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lawson PA, Nikolaitchouk N, Falsen E, Westling K, Collins MD. Actinomyces funkei sp. nov., isolated from human clinical specimens. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:853–855 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Johnson JL, Moore LVH, Kaneko B, Moore WEC. Actinomyces georgiae sp. nov., Actinomyces gerencseriae sp. nov., designation of two genospecies of Actinomyces naeslundii, and inclusion of A. naeslundii serotypes ii and III and Actinomyces viscosus serotype II in A. naeslundii genospecies 2. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1990; 40:273–286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Collins MD, Stubbs S, Hommez J, Devriese LA. Molecular taxonomic studies of Actinomyces-like bacteria isolated from purulent lesions in pigs and description of Actinomyces hyovaginalis sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1993; 43:471–473 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Cato EP, Moore WEC, Nygaard G, Holdeman LV. Actinomyces meyeri sp. nov., specific epithet rev. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1984; 34:487–489 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Rao JU, Rash BA, Nobre MF, Da Costa MS, Rainey FA. Actinomyces naturae sp. nov., the first Actinomyces sp. isolated from a non-human or animal source. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2012; 101:155–168 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Batty I. Actinomyces odontolyticus, a new species of actinomycete regularly isolated from deep carious dentine. J Pathol Bacteriol 1958; 75:455–459 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Wüst J, Stubbs S, Weiss N, Funke G, Collins MD. Assignment of Actinomyces pyogenes-like (CDC coryneform group E) bacteria to the genus Actinomyces as Actinomyces radingae sp. nov. and Actinomyces turicensis sp. nov. Lett Appl Microbiol 1995; 20:76–81 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hoyles L, Falsen E, Holmström G, Persson A, Sjödén B. Actinomyces suimastitidis sp. nov., isolated from pig mastitis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1323–1326 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Hall V, Collins MD, Hutson R, Inganäs E, Falsen E. Actinomyces vaccimaxillae sp. nov., from the jaw of a cow. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:603–606 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Meng X, Lu S, Lai X-H, Wang Y, Wen Y et al. Actinomyces liubingyangii sp. nov. isolated from the vulture Gypaetus barbatus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1873–1879 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Hoyles L, Pascual C, Falsen E, Foster G, Grainger JM. Actinomyces marimammalium sp. nov., from marine mammals. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:151–156 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Meng X, Lai X-H, Lu S, Liu S, Chen C et al. Actinomyces tangfeifanii sp. nov., isolated from the vulture Aegypius monachus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:3701–3706 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Yang C, Bai Y, Dong K, Yang J, Lai X-H et al. Actinomyces marmotae sp. nov. and Actinomyces procaprae sp. nov. isolated from wild animals and reclassification of Actinomyces liubingyangii and Actinomyces tangfeifanii as Boudabousia liubingyangii comb. nov. and Boudabousia tangfeifanii comb. nov., respectively. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Collins MD, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Fatty acid, isoprenoid quinone and polar lipid composition in the classification of Curtobacterium and related taxa. J Gen Microbiol 1980; 118:29–37 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Schumann P. Peptidoglycan structure. Methods Microbiol 2011; 38:101–129 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Schleifer KH. Analysis of the chemical composition and primary structure of murein. Methods Microbiol 1985; 18:123–156 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Staneck JL, Roberts GD. Simplified approach to identification of aerobic Actinomycetes by thin-layer chromatography. Appl Microbiol 1974; 28:226–231 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI technical note 101. Newark, DE: MIDI inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004978
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004978
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error