1887

Abstract

Thirteen Gram-stain-positive bacterial strains were isolated from Chinese traditional pickle and the gut of honeybee (). These strains were characterized using a polyphasic taxonomic approach. The data demonstrated that 12 of the 13 strains represented eight novel species belonging to the genera , , and ; strains HN36-1, 887-11, F79-211-2, 866-3, 6-5(1), 13B17, 117-1 and ZW152 were designated as the type strains. Based upon the data of polyphasic characterization obtained in the present study, eight novel species, sp. nov., sp. nov., sp. nov., sp. nov., sp. nov., sp. nov., sp. nov. and sp. nov., are proposed and the type strains are HN36-1 (=JCM 33867=CCTCC AB 2019385), 887-11 (=NCIMB 15201=CCM 8950=JCM 33864=CCTCC AB 2018396), F79-211-2 (=NCIMB 15254=JCM 33866=CCTCC AB 2019384), 866-3 (=JCM 33863=CCTCC AB 2019383), 6-5(1) (=NCIMB 15229=CCM 8977=JCM 33564=CCTCC AB 2019168), 13B17 (=NCIMB 15230=CCM 8979=JCM 33565=CCTCC AB 2019167), 117-1 (=NCIMB 15232=CCM 8980=JCM 33567) and ZW152 (=JCM 34363=CCTCC AB 2020299=LMG 32143=CCM 9110), respectively.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award no. 31471594)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ChunTao Gu
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004898
2021-07-27
2024-07-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Zheng J, Wittouck S, Salvetti E, Franz C, Harris HMB et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2782–2858 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Naser SM, Dawyndt P, Hoste B, Gevers D, Vandemeulebroecke K et al. Identification of lactobacilli by pheS and rpoA gene sequence analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2777–2789 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Li TT, Liu DD, Fu ML, Gu CT. Proposal of Lactobacillus kosoi Chiou et al. 2018 as a later heterotypic synonym of Lactobacillus micheneri McFrederick et al. 2018, elevation of Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. argentoratensis to the species level as Lactobacillus argentoratensis sp. nov., and Lactobacillus zhaodongensis sp. nov., isolated from traditional Chinese pickle and the intestinal tract of a honey bee (Apis mellifera. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3123–3133
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Miyamoto M, Seto Y, Hao DH, Teshima T, Sun YB et al. Lactobacillus harbinensis sp. nov., consisted of strains isolated from traditional fermented vegetables “Suan cai” in Harbin, Northeastern China and Lactobacillus perolens DSM 12745. Syst Appl Microbiol 28:688–694.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gu CT, Li CY, Yang LJ, Huo GC. Lactobacillus heilongjiangensis sp. nov., isolated from Chinese pickle. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:4094–4099
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Long GY, Gu CT. Lactobacillus jixianensis sp. nov., Lactobacillus baoqingensis sp. nov., Lactobacillus jiayinensis sp. nov., Lactobacillus zhaoyuanensis sp. nov., Lactobacillus lindianensis sp. nov., Lactobacillus huananensis sp. nov., Lactobacillus tangyuanensis sp. nov., Lactobacillus fuyuanensis sp. nov., Lactobacillus tongjiangensis sp. nov., Lactobacillus fujinensis sp. nov. and Lactobacillus mulengensis sp. nov., isolated from Chinese traditional pickle. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:2340–2353
    [Google Scholar]
  7. An D, Cai S, Dong X. Actinomyces ruminicola sp. nov., isolated from cattle rumen. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:2043–2048 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Naser SM, Thompson FL, Hoste B, Gevers D, Dawyndt P et al. Application of multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) for rapid identification of Enterococcus species based on rpoA and pheS genes. Microbiology (Reading) 2005; 151:2141–2150 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:4673–4680 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kishino H, Hasegawa M. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in hominoidea. J Mol Evol 1989; 29:170–179 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Coil D, Jospin G, Darling AE. A5-miseq: an updated pipeline to assemble microbial genomes from Illumina MiSeq data. Bioinformatics 2015; 31:587–589 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. Spades: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:75 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:1312–1313 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Davis JJ, Wattam AR, Aziz RK, Brettin T, Butler R et al. The PATRIC Bioinformatics Resource Center: expanding data and analysis capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:D606–D612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park SC, Chun J. OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Yoon SH, Ha S, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand in Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mattarelli P, Holzapfel W, Franz CM, Endo A, Felis GE et al. Recommended minimal standards for description of new taxa of the genera Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and related genera. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1434–1451 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Krieg NR, Padgett PJ. Phenotypic and physiological characterization methods. Methods Microbiol 2011; 38:15–60
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Miyashita M, Yukphan P, Chaipitakchonlatarn W, Malimas T, Sugimoto M et al. Lactobacillus plajomi sp. nov. and Lactobacillus modestisalitolerans sp. nov., isolated from traditional fermented foods. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 65:2485–2490
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hasegawa T, Takizawa M, Tanida S. A rapid analysis for chemical grouping of aerobic actinomycetes. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1983; 29:319–322 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Tak EJ, Kim HS, Lee J-Y, Kang W, Hyun D-W et al. Vagococcus martis sp. nov., isolated from the small intestine of a marten, Martes flavigula. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:3398–3402 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE, USA: Microbial ID Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Long GY, Wei YX, Tu W, Gu CT. Lactobacillus hegangensis sp. nov., Lactobacillus suibinensis sp. nov., Lactobacillus daqingensis sp. nov., Lactobacillus yichunensis sp. nov., Lactobacillus mulanensis sp. nov., Lactobacillus achengensis sp. nov., Lactobacillus wuchangensis sp. nov., Lactobacillus gannanensis sp. nov., Lactobacillus binensis sp. nov. and Lactobacillus angrenensis sp. nov., isolated from Chinese traditional pickle and yogurt. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2467–2484
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004898
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004898
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error