1887

Abstract

A novel bacterial isolate designated as strain AGMB01083 was isolated from Korean cow faeces deposited in the National Institute of Animal Science (Wanju, Republic of Korea). The bacterium is obligate anaerobic, Gram-strain-positive, and motile. Cells are straight or curved rod-shaped, flagella and spores are observed. Growth occurs between 20–40 °C (temperature optimum of 35 °C), at pH 7–9 (pH optimum of 7), and in the presence of 0.5–1.0 % (w/v) NaCl. Based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, the strain belongs to the genus and is most closely related to HY-37-4 (=KCTC5027, similarity, 95.7 %). The DNA G+C content is 36.2 mol%, determined by the whole-genome sequence. The average nucleotide identity value between strain AGMB01083 and strain HY-37-4 is 75.5 %, below the interspecies identity threshold value. The major cellular fatty acids (>10 %) of strain AGMB01083 are C, C dimethyl acetal (DMA), and C 3-OH. Based on the phylogenetic, phenotypic, biochemical, chemotaxonomic, and genomic characterization, strain AGMB01083 is proposed to be a novel species, named , in the genus . The type strain is AGMB01083 (=KCTC 15857=NBRC 114517).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (Award NRF-2016M3A9F3946674)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Jung-SookLee
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (Award NRF-2019M3A9F3065226)
    • Principle Award Recipient: JuHuck Lee
  • Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (Award 20009412)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Seung-HwanPark
  • Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology
    • Principle Award Recipient: NotApplicable
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004842
2021-09-30
2021-10-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Shanks OC, Kelty CA, Archibeque S, Jenkins M, Newton RJ et al. Community structures of fecal bacteria in cattle from different animal feeding operations. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011; 77:2992–3001 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kim M, Wells JE. A meta-analysis of bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle. Curr Microbiol 2016; 72:145–151 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dill-McFarland KA, Breaker JD, Suen G. Microbial succession in the gastrointestinal tract of dairy cows from 2 weeks to first lactation. Sci Rep 2017; 7:40864 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jeong H, Lim YW, Yi H, Sekiguchi Y, Kamagata Y et al. Anaerosporobacter mobilis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1784–1787 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Meehan CJ, Beiko RG. A phylogenomic view of ecological specialization in the Lachnospiraceae, a family of digestive tract-associated bacteria. Genome Biol Evol 2014; 6:703–713 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Euzeby JP. List of bacterial names with standing in nomenclature: a folder available on the internet. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:590–592 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Choi SH, Park JE, Choi JY, Kang SW, Rhee MS et al. n.d draft genome sequence of anaerosporobacter sp. nov., strain AGMB01083 isolated from a faeces of korean cow. Korean J Microbiol 56:180–182
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Wilson KH, Blitchington RB, Greene RC. Amplification of bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA with polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1990; 28:1942–1946 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Zoology 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park SC, Chun J. OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Rodriguez-R L, Konstantinidis K. The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ Preprints 2016
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Baek I. UBCG: Up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnson MJ, Thatcher E, Cox ME. Techniques for controlling variability in gram staining of obligate anaerobes. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33:755–758 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Suslow TV, Schroth MN, Isaka M. Application of a rapid method for gram differentiation of plant pathogenic and saprophytic bacteria without staining. Phytopathology 1982; 72:917–918
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Schaeffer AB, Fulton MD. A simplified method of staining endospores. Science 1933; 77:194 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Shin YK, Lee JS, Chun CO, Kim HJ, Park YH. Isoprenoid quinone profiles of the Leclercia adecarboxylata KCTC 1036T. J Microbiol Biotechnol 1996; 6:68–69
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Komagata K, Suzuki KI. 4 lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. Methods Microbiol 1988; 19:161–207
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004842
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004842
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error