1887

Abstract

One thermophilic bacterium, designated strain SYSU G02662, was isolated from hot spring sediment sampled in Tibet, PR China. Polyphasic taxonomic analyses and whole-genome sequencing were used to determine the taxonomy position of the strain. Phylogenetic analysis using 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that strain SYSU G02662 showed the highest sequence similarity to SCSIO 58843 (95.1 %). The strain could be differentiated from other species of the family by its distinct phenotypic and genotypic characteristics. Cells of strain SYSU G02662 were aerobic, Gram-staining-positive and short rodshaped. Growth occurred optimally at 45 °C and pH 7.0. In addition, -diaminopimelic acid was the diagnostic diamino acid in the cell-wall peptidoglycan. The respiratory quinone was MK-9 (H), while the major fatty acids (>10 %) were C, C, C and iso-C. The detected polar lipids included diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylinositol mannoside and phosphatidylinositol. The G+C content of the genomic DNA was 70.5 % based on the draft genomic sequence. On the basis of phenotypic, genotypic and phylogenetic data, strain SYSU G02662 represents a novel species of a novel genus in the family , for which the name gen. nov., sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain of the proposed novel species is SYSU G02662 (=CGMCC 4.7688=KCTC 49500).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Innovation Group Project of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai) (Award 3110200005)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Wen-JunLi
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 31670009)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Wen-JunLi
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 91951205)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Wen-JunLi
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004760
2021-03-19
2024-05-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/71/3/ijsem004760.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004760&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Kurahashi M, Fukunaga Y, Sakiyama Y, Harayama S, Yokota A. Iamia majanohamensis gen. nov., sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from sea cucumber Holothuria edulis, and proposal of Iamiaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:869–873 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Jin L, Huy H, Kim KK, Lee HG, Kim HS et al. Aquihabitans daechungensis gen. nov., sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from reservoir water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:2970–2974 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. He Y-Q, Chen R-W, Li C, Shi S-B, Cui L-Q et al. Actinomarinicola tropica gen. nov. sp. nov., a new marine actinobacterium of the family Iamiaceae, isolated from South China Sea sediment environments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3852–3858 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Amend JP, Shock EL. Energetics of overall metabolic reactions of thermophilic and hyperthermophilic archaea and bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2001; 25:175–243 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Reasoner DJ, Geldreich EE. A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water. Appl Environ Microbiol 1985; 49:1–7 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ming H, Yin YR, Li S, Nie GX, Yu T-T et al. Thermus caliditerrae sp. nov., a novel thermophilic species isolated from a geothermal area. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:650–656 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Buck JD. Nonstaining (KOH) method for determination of gram reactions of marine bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1982; 44:992–993 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Smibert RA, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, D.C: American Society of Microbiology; 1994 pp 607–654
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Groth I, Schumann P, Rainey FA, Martin K, Schuetze B et al. Demetria terragena gen. nov., sp. nov., a new genus of actinomycetes isolated from compost soil. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:1129–1133 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Collins MD, Jones D. Lipids in the classification and identification of coryneform bacteria containing peptidoglycans based on 2, 4-diaminobutyric acid. J Appl Bacteriol 1980; 48:459–470 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hasegawa T, Takizawa M, Tanida S. A rapid analysis for chemical grouping of aerobic actinomycetes. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1983; 29:319–322 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Li W-J, Xu P, Schumann P, Zhang Y-Q, Pukall R et al. Georgenia ruanii sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from forest soil in Yunnan (China), and emended description of the genus Georgenia . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1424–1428 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Yoon SH, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically United database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Edgar RC. Muscle: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1792–1797 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:1972–1973 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Walter MF. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Biol 1971; 20:406–416
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. mega7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Felsenstein J, Joseph F. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhi XY, Li W-J, Stackebrandt E. An update of the structure and 16S rRNA gene sequence-based definition of higher ranks of the class Actinobacteria, with the proposal of two new suborders and four new families and emended descriptions of the existing higher taxa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:589–608 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 2012; 1:18 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with glimmer. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:673–679 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Salam N, Jiao JY, Zhang XT, Li W-J. Update on the classification of higher ranks in the phylum Actinobacteria . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:1331–1355 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Chaumeil PA, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 2020; 36:1925–1927
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:268–274 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Luo C, Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. MyTaxa: an advanced taxonomic classifier for genomic and metagenomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:73–74 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004760
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004760
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error