1887

Abstract

A novel member of the actinobacteria, designated strain A-T 0013, was isolated from humic soil on a bird’s nest fern ( L.) collected from Khao Yai National Park in Thailand. According the results of a polyphasic taxonomic study, A-T 0013 had characteristics typical of members of the genus . The 16S rRNA gene sequence indicated that A-T 0013 shared ≤98 % sequence similarity with all members of the genus . The most closely related species was IFM 10200 (97.92 % sequence similarity). The average nucleotide identity based on (ANIb) value with IFM 10200 was 76.81 %. The cell-wall peptidoglycan contained -diaminopimelic acid. The whole-cell sugars contained ribose, arabinose and galactose. The predominant menaquinone was MK-9(H). The predominant fatty acids were C, Cω9, summed feature 3 (Cω7/Cω6), and C 10-methyl. Mycolic acid was present. The polar lipid profile for this strain ncluded diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol and phosphatidylinositol mannosides. The G+C content of the genomic DNA was 66.1 mol%. Differentiation of A-T 0013 from the most closely related species, IFM 10200, was evident from digital DNA–DNA hybridization values of 21.8 %. On the basis of the results of comparative analysis of phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and genotypic data, strain A-T 0013 is concluded to represent a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is A-T 0013 (=TBRC 11910=NBRC 114549).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004746
2021-03-12
2024-05-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/71/3/ijsem004746.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004746&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Tsukamura M. Proposal of a new genus, Gordona, for slightly acid-fast organisms occurring in sputa of patients with pulmonary disease and in soil. J Gen Microbiol 1971; 68:15–26 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kim SB, Brown R, Oldfield C, Gilbert SC, Goodfellow M. Gordonia desulfuricans sp. nov., a benzothiophene-desulphurizing actinomycete. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49:1845–1851 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Tamura T, Saito S, Hamada M, Kang Y, Hoshino Y et al. Gordonia crocea sp. nov. and Gordonia spumicola sp. nov. isolated from sludge of a wastewater treatment plant. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3718–3723 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Sangkanu S, Suriyachadkun C, Phongpaichit S. Gordonia sediminis sp. nov., an actinomycete isolated from mangrove sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:1814–1820 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jendrossek D, Birke J. Rubber oxygenases. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2019; 103:125–142 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Nonomura H, Hayakawa M. New methods for the selective isolation of soil Actinomycetes. In Okami Y, Beppu T, Ogawara H. (editors) Biology of Actinomycetes Tokyo: Japan Scientific Societies; 1988 pp 288–293
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:313–340 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Saito H, Miura KI. Preparation of transforming deoxyribonucleic acid by phenol treatment. Biochim Biophys Acta 1963; 72:619–629 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Tamura T, Nakagaito Y, Nishii T, Hasegawa T, Stackebrandt E et al. A new genus of the order Actinomycetales, Couchioplanes gen. nov., with descriptions of Couchioplanes caeruleus (Horan and Brodsky 1986) comb. nov. and Couchioplanes caeruleus subsp. azureus subsp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:193–203 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Pootakham W, Mhuantong W, Yoocha T, Putchim L, Sonthirod C et al. High resolution profiling of coral-associated bacterial communities using full-length 16S rRNA sequence data from PacBio SMRT sequencing system. Sci Rep 2017; 7:2774 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:4673–4680 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 1999; 41:95–98
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Felsenstein J. Parsimony in systematics: biological and statistical issues. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1983; 14:313–333 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 2017; 13:e1005595 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lefort V, Desper R, Gascuel O. FastME 2.0: a comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:2798–2800 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Blin K, Shaw S, Steinke K, Villebro R, Ziemert N et al. antiSMASH 5.0: updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:W81–W87 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102:2567–2572 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O. International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37:463–464
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Itoh T, Kudo T, Parenti F, Seino A. Amended description of the genus Kineosporia, based on chemotaxonomic and morphological studies. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:168–173 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kelly KL. Inter-Society Color Council – National Bureau of Standards Color Name Charts Illustrated with Centroid Colors Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1964
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Gordon RE, Barnett DA, Handerhan JE, Pang CHN. Nocardia coeliaca, Nocardia autotrophica, and the nocardin strain. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1974; 24:54–63 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Arai T. Culture Media for Actinomycetes Tokyo: The Society for Actinomycetes Japan (in Japanese); 1975
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Williams ST, Cross T. Actinomycetes. Methods Microbiol 1971; 4:295–334
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Staneck JL, Roberts GD. Simplified approach to identification of aerobic actinomycetes by thin-layer chromatography. Appl Microbiol 1974; 28:226–231 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Uchida K, Aida KO. An improved method for the glycolate test for simple identification of the acyl type of bacterial cell walls. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1984; 30:131–134 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Komagata K, Suzuki KI. Lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. Methods Microbiol 1987; 19:161–207
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, Technical Note# 101. 2001
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Tomiyasu I. Mycolic acid composition and thermally adaptative changes in Nocardia asteroides . J Bacteriol 1982; 151:828–837 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Wu C, Lu X, Qin M, Wang Y, Ruan J. Analysis of menaquinone compound in microbial cells by HPLC. Microbiology 1989; 16:176–178
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004746
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004746
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error