1887

Abstract

A floc-forming bacterial strain, designated HKLI-1, was isolated from the activated sludge of a municipal sewage treatment plant in Hong Kong SAR, PR China. Cells of this strain were Gram-stain-negative, strictly aerobic, catalase- and oxidase-positive, rod-shaped and motile by means of a single polar flagellum. Growth occurred at 18–37 °C (optimum, 28 °C), pH 5.5–9.0 (optimum, pH 7.5) and with 0–8.0 % (w/v) NaCl (optimum, 1–1.5 %) concentration. The major fatty acids of strain HKLI-1 were C and summed feature 3 (C ω7 and/or C ω6). The polar lipid profile contained diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol and three unidentified lipids. The DNA G+C content was 63.5 mol% from whole genomic sequence analysis. Based on the results of 16S rRNA gene sequences analysis, this strain should be assigned to the genus and is closely related to DQS-4 (94.93 % 16S rRNA gene sequence pairwise similarity), MF63 (94.91 %) and SWub3 (94.01 %), but separate from them by large distances in different phylogenetic trees. Based on whole genome analysis, the orthologous average nucleotide identity and DNA–DNA hybridization values against four of the closest relatives were 73.03–74.83 and 17.2–23.0 %, respectively. The phylogenetic, genotypic, phenotypic and chemotaxonomic data demonstrated that strain HKLI-1 could be distinguished from its phylogenetically related species, and that this strain represented a novel species within the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is HKLI-1 (= 72659=CCTCC AB 2019312).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • the Special Fund for Strategic Pilot Technology of Chinese Academy of Sciences (A) (Award XDA23040401)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Dongru Qiu
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award no. 91751106)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Dongru Qiu
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004476
2020-09-18
2024-05-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/70/11/5799.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004476&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Meng YC, Liu HC, Zhou YG, Cai M, Kang Y. Vibrio gangliei sp. nov., a novel member of Vibrionaceae isolated from sawdust in a pigpen. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:1969–1974 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beveridge TJ, Lawrence JR, Murray RGE. Sampling and staining for light microscopy. In Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf GA, Schmidt TM, Snyder LR. (editors) In Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2007 pp 19–33
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Breznak JA, Costilow RN. Physicochemical factors in growth. In Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf GA, Schmidt TM, Snyder LR. (editors) In Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2007 pp 309–329
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang LY, Ming H, Zhao ZL, Ji WL, Salam N et al. Nocardioides allogilvus sp. nov., a novel Actinobacterium isolated from a karst cave. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2485–2490 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lee DJ, Wong BT, Adav SS. Azoarcus taiwanensis sp. nov., a denitrifying species isolated from a hot spring. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2014; 98:1301–1307 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dahal RH, Chaudhary DK, Kim J. Rhodanobacter hydrolyticus sp. nov., a novel DNA- and tyrosine-hydrolysing gammaproteobacterium isolated from forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2580–2586 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Reinhold-Hurek B, Hurek T. The genera Azoarcus, Azovibrio, Azospira and Azonexus. In The Prokaryotes 2006; 3:873–891
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Reinhold-Hurek B, Hurek T, Gillis M, Hoste B, Vancanneyt M et al. Azoarcus gen. nov., nitrogen-fixing Proteobacteria associated with roots of Kallar grass (Leptochloa fusca (L.) Kunth), and description of two species, Azoarcus indigens sp. nov. and Azoarcus communis sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1993; 43:574–584 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fu GY, Yu XY, Yu XD, Zhao Z, Chen C et al. Azoarcus pumilus sp. nov., isolated from seawater in Sanya, China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:1459–1464 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Song B, Häggblom MM, Zhou J, Tiedje JM, Palleroni NJ. Taxonomic characterization of denitrifying bacteria that degrade aromatic compounds and description of Azoarcus toluvorans sp. nov. and Azoarcus toluclasticus sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49 Pt 3:1129–1140 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Mechichi T, Stackebrandt E, Gad’on N, Fuchs G. Phylogenetic and metabolic diversity of bacteria degrading aromatic compounds under denitrifying conditions, and description of Thauera phenylacetica sp. nov., Thauera aminoaromatica sp. nov., and Azoarcus buckelii sp. nov. Arch Microbiol 2002; 178:26–35 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen MH, Sheu SY, James EK, Young CC, Chen WM. Azoarcus olearius sp. nov., a nitrogen-fixing bacterium isolated from oil-contaminated soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:3755–3761 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Srinivasan S, Lee S-Y, Kim MK, Jung H-Y. Complete genome sequence of Hymenobacter sp. DG25A, a gamma radiation-resistant bacterium isolated from soil. Mol Cell Toxicol 2017; 13:65–72 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim JY, Kim D-U, Kang M-S, Jang JH, Kim SJ et al. Roseomonas radiodurans sp. nov., a gamma-radiation-resistant bacterium isolated from gamma ray-irradiated soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2443–2447 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RA, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. In Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf GA, Schmidt TM, Snyder LR. (editors) In Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2007 pp 330–393
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhang X-Q, Sun C, Wang C-S, Zhang X, Zhou X et al. Sinimarinibacterium flocculans gen. nov., sp. nov., a gammaproteobacterium from offshore surface seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:3541–3546 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Chun J, Goodfellow M. A phylogenetic analysis of the genus Nocardia with 16S rRNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1995; 45:240–245 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Cai M, Wang L, Cai H, Li Y, Wang YN et al. Salinarimonas ramus sp. nov. and Tessaracoccus oleiagri sp. nov., isolated from a crude oil-contaminated saline soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1767–1775 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim MK, Kang MS, Srinivasan S, Lee DH, Lee SY et al. Complete genome sequence of Hymenobacter sedentarius DG5BT, a bacterium resistant to gamma radiation. Mol Cell Toxicol 2017; 13:199–205 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park SC, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gao N, Xia M, Dai J, Yu D, An W et al. Both widespread PEP-CTERM proteins and exopolysaccharides are required for floc formation of Zoogloea resiniphila and other activated sludge bacteria. Environ Microbiol 2018; 20:1677–1692 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Yu D, Xia M, Zhang L, Song Y, Duan Y et al. RpoN (σ54) is required for floc formation but not for extracellular polysaccharide biosynthesis in a floc-forming Aquincola tertiaricarbonis Strain. Appl Environ Microbiol 2017; 83:e00709–00717 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. An W, Guo F, Song Y, Gao N, Bai S, Dai J et al. Comparative genomics analyses on EPS biosynthesis genes required for floc formation of Zoogloea resiniphila and other activated sludge bacteria. Water Res 2016; 102:494–504 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Sánchez-Porro C, Gallego V, Busse H-J, Kämpfer P, Ventosa A. Transfer of Teichococcus ludipueritiae and Muricoccus roseus to the genus Roseomonas, as Roseomonas ludipueritiae comb. nov. and Roseomonas rosea comb. nov., respectively, and emended description of the genus Roseomonas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1193–1198 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Anders HJ, Kaetzke A, Kämpfer P, Ludwig W, Fuchs G. Taxonomic position of aromatic-degrading denitrifying pseudomonad strains K 172 and KB 740 and their description as new members of the genera Thauera, as Thauera aromatica sp. nov., and Azoarcus, as Azoarcus evansii sp. nov., respectively, members of the beta subclass of the Proteobacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1995; 45:327–333 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004476
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004476
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error