Skip to content
1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology

Volume 70, Issue 10

sp. nov., isolated from paddy soil Free

Abstract

Two Gram-stain-positive, facultatively anaerobic, motile, aerobic, rod-shaped and non-spore-forming actinobacteria, strains AO-9 and AO-18, were isolated from paddy soil collected from Daejeon, Republic of Korea. Colonies were smooth, lemon-yellow and circular and 0.5–0.8×2.0–2.4 µm in diameter after 3 days of incubation at 28 °C on tryptic soy agar. Phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that strains AO-9 and AO-18 belonged to the genus , showing the highest sequence similarities to FXJ8.089 (96.6 %), SYSUP0004 (96.5 %), DSM 20111 (96.2 %), DSM 20107 (96.1 %), NEAU-TCZ24 (96.1 %), TR7-06 (96.0 %), JCM 18111 (96.0 %) and less than 96 % to other closely related species. The DNA–DNA hybridization values between strains AO-9 and AO-18 were 87 %. The average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values between strain AO-9 and type strains of related species of the genus were 84.0–85.8 % and 20.3–20.9 %, respectively. The major cellular fatty acids are anteiso-C (49.9 %), C (12.9 %) and iso-C (12.1 %). The predominant isoprenoid quinone was MK-9 (H). The polar lipid profile consists of diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol and one unidentified lipid. The DNA G+C content was 72.9 mol%. Based on its distinctive phenotypic, phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic characteristics, the two strains are considered to represent novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is AO-9 (=KACC 19069=NBRC 112523).

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): Cellulomonas citrea sp. nov. and paddy soil
© 2020 The Authors
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004409
2020-09-02
2025-03-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/70/10/5304.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004409&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Stackebrandt E, Keddie RM. Genus Cellulomonas . In Sneath PHA, Mair NS, Sharpe ME, Holt JG. (editors) Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology 2 Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1986 pp 1325–1329
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Hartmann A, Baldani JI. The genus Azospirillum . In Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH, Stackebrandt E. (editors) The Prokaryotes, V. 5: Proteobacteria Alpha and Beta Subclasses New York, USA: Springer Verlag; 2006 pp 115–140
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Cáceres EA, Rodriguez-Caceres EA. Improved medium for isolation of Azospirillum spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 1982; 44:990–991 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:313–340 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Williams ST, Goodfellow M, Alderson G. Genus Streptomyces Waksman and Henrici 1943, 339AL . In Williams ST, Sharpe ME, Holt JG. (editors) Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology 4 Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1989 pp 2452–2492
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Jacobson E, Grauville WC, Fogs CE. Color Harmony Manual, 4th ed. Chicago: Container Corporation of America; 1958
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang J, Gu T, Zhou Y, He J, Zheng L-Q et al. Terrimonas rubra sp. nov., isolated from a polluted farmland soil and emended description of the genus Terrimonas . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2593–2597 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Conn HJ, Breed RS. The use of the nitrate-reduction test in characterizing bacteria. J Bacteriol 1919; 4:267–290 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Kamlage B. Methods for general and molecular bacteriology. Mol Nutr Food Res 1996; 40:103
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. (editors) Manual of Method for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp 607–654
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:313–340 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee H-J, Han S-I, Whang K-S. Streptomyces gramineus sp. nov., an antibiotic-producing actinobacterium isolated from bamboo (Sasa borealis) rhizosphere soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:856–859 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically United database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:2947–2948 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park S-C, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Ezaki T, Hashimoto Y, Yabuuchi E. Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid-deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioisotopes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial strains. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:224–229 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Lefort V, Desper R, Gascuel O. FastME 2.0: a comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:2798–2800 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Farris JS. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am Nat 1972; 106:645–668 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Lechevalier MP, Lechevalier H. Chemical composition as a criterion in the classification of aerobic actinomycetes. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1970; 20:435–443 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Lechevalier MP, Lechevalier HA. The chemotaxonomy of actinomycetes. In Dietz A, Thayer DW. (editors) Actinomycete Taxonomy Fairfax: VA: Society for Industrial Microbiology; 1980 pp 227–291
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Staneck JL, Roberts GD. Simplified approach to identification of aerobic actinomycetes by thin-layer chromatography. Appl Microbiol 1974; 28:226–231 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Collins MD. Isoprenoid quinone analysis in bacterial classification and identification. In Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. (editors) Chemical Methods in Bacterial Systematics London: Academic Press; 1985 pp 267–287
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhang L, Xi L, Qiu D, Song L, Dai X et al. Cellulomonas marina sp. nov., isolated from deep-sea water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:3014–3018 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Li Y-Q, Zhang H, Xiao M, Dong Z-Y, Zhang J-Y et al. Cellulomonas endophytica sp. nov., isolated from Gastrodia elata Blume. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3091–3095 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Lee C-M, Weon H-Y, Hong S-B, Jeon Y-A, Schumann P et al. Cellulomonas aerilata sp. nov., isolated from an air sample. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:2925–2929 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Shi Z, Luo G, Wang G. Cellulomonas carbonis sp. nov., isolated from coal mine soilInt. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol 2020; 70:631–635
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Tian Y, Han C, Hu J, Zhao J, Zhang C et al. Cellulomonas rhizosphaerae sp. nov., a novel actinomycete isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:1001–1008 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Kang M-S, Im W-T, Jung H-M, Kim MK, Goodfellow M et al. Cellulomonas composti sp. nov., a cellulolytic bacterium isolated from cattle farm compost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1256–1260 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Yoon M-H, Ten LN, Im W-T, Lee S-T. Cellulomonas chitinilytica sp. nov., a chitinolytic bacterium isolated from cattle-farm compost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1878–1884 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004409
Loading
Cellulomonas citrea sp. nov., isolated from paddy soil
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70, 5304 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004409
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004409
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004409
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error