1887

Abstract

The taxonomic status of all species was re-evaluated by comparative genomics based on whole genome sequencing. As a result, it is obvious that is a later heterotypic synonym of . In addition, genome-based analysis of strain CPO20170097, isolated from a patient in northern Denmark was allocated to the genus . This strain showed significant genotypic and phenotypic differences from and it is proposed that this strain represents a novel species of the genus, for which the name sp. nov. is proposed with the type strain CPO20170097 (=CCUG 73096=LMG 31042).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003918
2019-12-20
2020-01-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Kämpfer P, Glaeser SP, Raza MW, Abbasi SA, Perry JD. Pseudocitrobacter gen. nov., a novel genus of the Enterobacteriaceae with two new species Pseudocitrobacter faecalis sp. nov., and Pseudocitrobacter anthropi sp. nov, isolated from fecal samples from hospitalized patients in Pakistan. Syst Appl Microbiol 2014;37: 17– 22 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013;14: 60 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Colston SM, Fullmer MS, Beka L, Lamy B, Gogarten JP et al. Bioinformatic genome comparisons for taxonomic and phylogenetic assignments using Aeromonas as a test case. MBio 2014;5: e02136 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. (editors) Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics Chichester: Wiley; 1991
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Yoon SH, SM H, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically United database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017;67: 1613– 1617
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Yarza P, Richter M, Peplies J, Euzéby J, Amann R et al. The All-Species living tree project: a 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic tree of all sequenced type strains. Syst Appl Microbiol 2008;31: 241– 250 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ludwig W et al. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32: 1363– 1371 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Pruesse E, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. Sina: accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics 2012;28: 1823– 1829 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006;22: 2688– 2690 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Souvorov A, Agarwala R, Lipman DJ. SKESA: strategic k-mer extension for scrupulous assemblies. Genome Biol 2018;19: 153 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Blom J, Kreis J, Spänig S, Juhre T, Bertelli C et al. EDGAR 2.0: an enhanced software platform for comparative gene content analyses. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44: W22– W28 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016;33: 1870– 1874 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994;22: 4673– 4680 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jukes TH, Cantor CR. Evolution of the protein molecules In Munro HN. editor Mammalian Protein Metabolism New York: Academic Press; 1969; pp 21– 132
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. The rapid generation of mutationdata matrices from protein sequences. Comp Appl Biosc 1992;8: 275– 282
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106: 19126– 19131 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Wailan AM, Sartor AL, Zowawi HM, Perry JD, Paterson DL et al. Genetic Contexts of bla NDM-1 in Patients Carrying Multiple NDM-Producing Strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015;59: 7405– 7410 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Tängdén T, Giske CG. Global dissemination of extensively drug-resistant carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: clinical perspectives on detection, treatment and infection control. J Intern Med 2015;277: 501– 512 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kämpfer P, Steiof M, Dott W. Microbiological characterization of a fuel-oil contaminated site including numerical identification of heterotrophic water and soil bacteria. Microb Ecol 1991;21: 227– 251 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kämpfer P, Kroppenstedt RM. Numerical analysis of fatty acid patterns of coryneform bacteria and related taxa. Can J Microbiol 1996;42: 989– 1005 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003918
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003918
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error