1887

Abstract

A novel strain, YM-1, was recovered from human urine in PR China in 2017. Cells of strain YM-1 were Gram-stain-negative, rod-shaped, aerobic, motile, non-spore-forming and poly-β-hydroxybutyrate-accumulating. The strain contained Cω6/Cω7, C and Cω7 as major fatty acids; phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, diphosphatidylglycerol and an unidentified phospholipid as major polar lipids; and ubiquinone-8 as the predominant respiratory quinone. Comparison of 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that this strain had highest similarities to DS-28 (98.8 %) and 389 (98.1 %). The results of phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that the novel strain was clustered and well separated with DS-28 and 389 within the genus . The average nucleotide identity (ANI) and amino acid identity (AAI) analyses showed that this strain was not identified as DS-28 or 389, with values well below the threshold limit for species demarcation (ANI <88.1 %, AAI <88.6 %). Based on the above results, strain YM-1 is proposed to be a novel species of the genus with the name sp. nov. (YM-1=NBRC 113779=CGMCC 1.17135).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003802
2019-11-07
2019-11-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Grimes DJ, Woese CR, MacDonell MT, Colwell RR. Systematic study of the genus Vogesella gen. nov. and its type species, Vogesella indigofera comb. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997;47: 19– 27 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chou YJ, Chou JH, Lin MC, Arun AB, Young CC et al. Vogesella perlucida sp. nov., a non-pigmented bacterium isolated from spring water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008;58: 2677– 2681 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chou JH, Chou YJ, Arun AB, Young CC, Chen CA et al. Vogesella lacus sp. nov., isolated from a soft-shell turtle culture pond. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009;59: 2629– 2632 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jørgensen NOG, Brandt KK, Nybroe O, Hansen M. Vogesella mureinivorans sp. nov., a peptidoglycan-degrading bacterium from lake water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010;60: 2467– 2472 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Subhash Y, Tushar L, Sasikala C, Ramana CV, Ch R V. Vogesella alkaliphila sp. nov., isolated from an alkaline soil, and emended description of the genus Vogesella. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013;63: 2338– 2343 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Sheu SY, Chen JC, Young CC, Chen WM. Vogesella fluminis sp. nov., isolated from a freshwater river, and emended description of the genus Vogesella. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013;63: 3043– 3049 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sheu SY, Chen YL, Young CC, Chen WM. Vogesella facilis sp. nov., isolated from a freshwater river, and emended description of the genus Vogesella. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016;66: 817– 823 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen WM, Chen JC, Wang C, Huang CW, Sheu SY. Vogesella amnigena sp. nov., isolated from a freshwater river. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015;65: 3634– 3640 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Rameshkumar N, Lang E, Tanaka N. Description of Vogesella oryzae sp. nov., isolated from the rhizosphere of saline tolerant pokkali rice. Syst Appl Microbiol 2016;39: 20– 24 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Xu P, Li WJ, Tang SK, Zhang YQ, Chen GZ et al. Naxibacter alkalitolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family 'Oxalobacteraceae' isolated from China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005;55: 1149– 1153 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chung YC, Kobayashi T, Kanai H, Akiba T, Kudo T. Purification and Properties of Extracellular Amylase from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Thermococcus profundus DT5432. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995;61: 1502– 1506
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Leifson E. Atlas of bacterial flagellation. Q Rev Biol 1960;242:
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Coico R. Gram staining. Curr Protoc Microbiol 2005
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Schlegel HG, Lafferty R, Krauss I. The isolation of mutants not accumulating poly-?-hydroxybutyric acid. Archiv Mikrobiol 1970;71: 283– 294 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bullock NO, Aslanzadeh J. Biochemical Profile-Based Microbial Identification Systems Advanced Techniques in Diagnostic Microbiology 2006; pp 84– 116
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jeffries CD, Holtman DF, Guse DG. Rapid method for determining the activity of microorganisms on nucleic acids. J Bacteriol 1957;73: 590– 591
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RA, Krieg NR. Phenotypic Characterization and the Principles of Comparative Systematics In Reddy CA, Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf G. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology3, 3rd edn. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2007; pp 330– 393
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Thomson CA, Delaquis PJ, Mazza G. Detection and measurement of microbial lipase activity: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 1999;39: 165– 187 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hsu SC, Lockwood JL. Powdered chitin agar as a selective medium for enumeration of actinomycetes in water and soil. Appl Microbiol 1975;29: 422– 426
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Yu TT, Yao JC, Ming H, Yin YR, Zhou EM et al. Thermus tengchongensis sp. nov., isolated from a geothermally heated soil sample in Tengchong, Yunnan, south-west China. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2013;103: 513– 518 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Humphries RM, Ambler J, Mitchell SL, Castanheira M, Dingle T et al. Clsi methods development and standardization Working group best practices for evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility tests. J Clin Microbiol 2018;56: [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977;100: 221– 230 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kroppenstedt RM. Separation of bacterial menaquinones by HPLC using reverse phase (RP18) and a silver loaded ion exchanger as stationary phases. J Liq Chromatogr 1982;5: 2359– 2367 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Minnikin DE, Collins MD, Goodfellow M. Fatty acid and polar lipid composition in the classification of Cellulomonas, Oerskovia and related taxa. J Appl Bacteriol 1979;47: 87– 95 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Collins MD, Jones D. Lipids in the classification and identification of coryneform bacteria containing peptidoglycans based on 2, 4-diaminobutyric acid. J Appl Bacteriol 1980;48: 459– 470 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Inc. 1990; pp 1– 7
    [Google Scholar]
  27. WJ L, Xu P, Schumann P, Zhang YQ, Pukall R et al. Georgenia ruanii sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from forest soil in Yunnan (China), and emended description of the genus Georgenia. Int J Syst Evol Microbio 2007;57: 1424– 1428
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu L, Salam N, Jiao JY, Jiang HC, Zhou EM et al. Diversity of culturable thermophilic actinobacteria in hot springs in Tengchong, China and studies of their biosynthetic gene profiles. Microb Ecol 2016;72: 150– 162 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106: 19126– 19131 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25: 4876– 4882 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987;4: 406– 425 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981;17: 368– 376 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kluge AG, Farris JS. Quantitative Phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst Zool 1969;18: 1– 32 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016;33: 1870– 1874 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980;16: 111– 120 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985;39: 783– 791 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018;34: i884– i890 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012;19: 455– 477 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014;30: 2068– 2069 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102: 2567– 2572 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol 2005;187: 6258– 6264 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003802
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003802
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error