1887

Abstract

A novel strain, designated NIBRBAC000499792, was isolated from a soil sample collected at Jukgye, Dongnam, Cheonan, Republic of Korea. Cells were Gram-positive, non-motile, non-spore-forming, rod-shaped, oxidase-negative and catalase-negative. Colonies grown on de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe agar were white, circular, raised and entire. Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis revealed that strain NIBRBAC000499792 belongs to the genus Lactobacillus (family Lactobacillaceae ) and is most closely related to Lactobacillus nodensis DSM 19682 (96.1 % similarity) and Lactobacillus tucceti KCTC 21005 (96.7 %). The results of DNA–DNA hybridization experiments demonstrated that strain NIBRBAC000499792 represents a novel species. Major fatty acids are C18 : 1ω9c, C16 : 0 and unidentified 18.846 and/or C19 : 1ω6c and/or C19 : 0cyclo. The predominant respiratory quinones are menaquinone-8 and menaquinone-9. The major polar lipids are phosphatidylglycerol and diphosphatidylglycerol. The minor polar lipids are one unidentified aminophospholipid, one unidentified phospholipid, and four unidentified lipids. Next-generation sequencing analysis of strain NIBRBAC000499792 indicated that the total genome size was 1 548 794 bp with a G+C content of 33.1 mol%, 1586 coding sequences, 50 tRNAs and nine rRNAs. The most closely related genomes belonged to Lactobacillus species. Most metabolic pathways were related to carbon metabolism and carbon fixation. Based on this polyphasic analysis, strain NIBRBAC000499792 represents a novel species of the genus Lactobacillus , for which the name Lactobacillus terrae sp. nov. is proposed, with the type strain NIBRBAC000499792 (=KCTC 21093=JCM 32269).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002918
2018-07-16
2024-12-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/68/9/2906.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002918&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Hammes WP, Hertel C. Genus Lactobacillus. In Vos P, Garrity GM, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W et al. (editors) Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd ed. vol. 3 New York: Springer, Bergey’s Manual Trust; 2009 pp. 465–511
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Tannock GW. Identification of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria. Curr Issues Mol Biol 1999; 1:53–64[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Duar RM, Lin XB, Zheng J, Martino ME, Grenier T et al. Lifestyles in transition: evolution and natural history of the genus Lactobacillus. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2017; 41:S27–S48 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. (editors) Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1991 pp. 115–175
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kim OS, Cho YJ, Lee K, Yoon SH, Kim M et al. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:716–721 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:2725–2729 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Stackebrandt E, Ebers J. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today 2006; 33:152–155
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Adams JL, Battjes CJ, Buthala DA. Biological specimen preparation for SEM by a method other than critical point drying. In Bailey GW. (editor) Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Electron Microscopy Society of America San Francisco: San Francisco Press; 1987
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Schädler S, Burkhardt C, Kappler A. Evaluation of electron microscopic sample preparation methods and imaging techniques for characterization of cell-mineral aggregates. Geomicrobiol J 2008; 25:228–239 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Irisawa T, Tanaka N, Kitahara M, Sakamoto M, Ohkuma M et al. Lactobacillus furfuricola sp. nov., isolated from Nukadoko, rice bran paste for Japanese pickles. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:2902–2906 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kröckel L, Schillinger U, Franz CM, Bantleon A, Ludwig W. Lactobacillus versmoldensis sp. nov., isolated from raw fermented sausage. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:513–517 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kashiwagi T, Suzuki T, Kamakura T. Lactobacillus nodensis sp. nov., isolated from rice bran. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:83–86 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chenoll E, Carmen Macián M, Aznar R. Lactobacillus tucceti sp. nov., a new lactic acid bacterium isolated from sausage. Syst Appl Microbiol 2006; 29:389–395 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ezaki T, Hashimoto Y, Yabuuchi E. Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid-deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioisotopes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial strains. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:224–229 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Wayne LG, Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR et al. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE, USA: MIDI Inc.; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Komagata K, Suzuki K. Lipids and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. Methods Microbiol 1987; 19:161–203
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Drucker DB, Megson G, Harty DW, Riba I, Gaskell SJ. Phospholipids of Lactobacillus spp. J Bacteriol 1995; 177:6304–6308 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hiraishi A, Ueda Y, Ishihara J, Mori T. Comparative lipoquinone analysis of influent sewage and activated sludge by high-performance liquid chromatography and photodiode array detection. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1996; 42:457–469 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:3389–3402 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28:27–30 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L, Miller W. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J Comput Biol 2000; 7:203–214 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002918
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002918
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error