1887

Abstract

Two strains of Gram-stain-negative, facultatively anaerobic short-rod bacteria were recovered from two different food samples in Ma’anshan city, Anhui province, China in 2008. The bacteria were characterized in a polyphasic taxonomic study that included phenotypic, phylogenetic and genotypic methodologies. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene demonstrated that the two strains belonged to the genus Proteus and were most similar to Proteus vulgaris ATCC 29905 with a score of 99.7 %. Phylogenetic analysis of the rpoB gene placed the two strains into a cluster with a distinctly interspecies phylogenetic branch that was clearly separated from six type strains of the genus Proteus , with the most closely related species being Proteus mirabilis ATCC 29906. In silico genomic comparisons, including in silico DNA–DNA hybridization (isDDH) and average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis showed that the representative strain, 08MAS0041, and all six Proteus species share less than 70 % isDDH and have a 95 % ANI cutoff level, supporting the designation of the two strains as a novel species of the genus Proteus . The predominant cellular fatty acids of strain 08MAS0041 were C16 : 0 (24.8 %), C16 : 1ω7c/16 : 1ω6c (16.5 %), C18 : 1ω6c/C18 : 1 ω7c (14.5 %), C17 : 0 cyclo (12.6 %) and C16 : 1iso I/C14 : 0 3-OH (10.6 %). The analysis of biochemical, phylogenetic and genomic data confirmed that the two strains were clearly different from all recognized species of the genus Proteus and represent a novel Proteus species, for which the name Proteus alimentorum sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is 08MAS0041 (=DSM 104685=CGMCC 1.15939).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002689
2018-03-06
2019-08-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/68/4/1390.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002689&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. O'Hara CM, Brenner FW, Miller JM. Classification, identification, and clinical significance of Proteus, Providencia, and Morganella. Clin Microbiol Rev 2000;13:534–546 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Armbruster CE, Mobley HL. Merging mythology and morphology: the multifaceted lifestyle of Proteus mirabilis. Nat Rev Microbiol 2012;10:743–754 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Seo SU, Kamada N, Muñoz-Planillo R, Kim YG, Kim D et al. Distinct commensals induce interleukin-1β via NLRP3 inflammasome in inflammatory monocytes to promote intestinal inflammation in response to injury. Immunity 2015;42:744–755 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hauser G. Über fäulnissbacterien und deren beziehungen zur septicamie. Ein betrag zur morphologie der spaltpilze Vogel, Leipzig, Germany: 1885
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hickman FW, Steigerwalt AG, Farmer JJ, Brenner DJ. Identification of Proteus penneri sp. nov., formerly known as Proteus vulgaris indole negative or as Proteus vulgaris biogroup 1. J Clin Microbiol 1982;15:1097–1102[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Behrendt U, Augustin J, Spröer C, Gelbrecht J, Schumann P et al. Taxonomic characterisation of Proteus terrae sp. nov., a N2O-producing, nitrate-ammonifying soil bacterium. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2015;108:1457–1468 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hyun DW, Jung MJ, Kim MS, Shin NR, Kim PS et al. Proteus cibarius sp. nov., a swarming bacterium from Jeotgal, a traditional Korean fermented seafood, and emended description of the genus Proteus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016;66:2158–2164 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. O'Hara CM, Brenner FW, Steigerwalt AG, Hill BC, Holmes B et al. Classification of Proteus vulgaris biogroup 3 with recognition of Proteus hauseri sp. nov., nom. rev. and unnamed Proteus genomospecies 4, 5 and 6. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000;50:1869–1875 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. (editors) Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics New York: Wiley; 1991; pp.115–175
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013;30:2725–2729 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Giammanco GM, Grimont PA, Grimont F, Lefevre M, Giammanco G et al. Phylogenetic analysis of the genera Proteus, Morganella and Providencia by comparison of rpoB gene sequences of type and clinical strains suggests the reclassification of Proteus myxofaciens in a new genus, Cosenzaea gen. nov., as Cosenzaea myxofaciens comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011;61:1638–1644 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Michelim L, Muller G, Zacaria J, Delamare AP, Costa SO et al. Comparison of PCR-based molecular markers for the characterization of Proteus mirabilis clinical isolates. Braz J Infect Dis 2008;12:423–429 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 2012;1:18 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk HP, Göker M. Digital DNA–DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010;2:117–134 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Klenk HP, Göker M. Taxonomic use of DNA G+C content and DNA–DNA hybridization in the genomic age. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014;64:352–356 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:19126–19131 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Colston SM, Fullmer MS, Beka L, Lamy B, Gogarten JP et al. Bioinformatic genome comparisons for taxonomic and phylogenetic assignments using Aeromonas as a test case. MBio 2014;5:e02136 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Smibert R, Krieg N. Phenotypic characterization. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994; pp.607–654
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Prado S, Dubert J, da Costa F, Martínez-Patiño D, Barja JL. Vibrios in hatchery cultures of the razor clam, Solen marginatus (Pulteney). J Fish Dis 2014;37:209–217 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Prado S, Dubert J, Barja JL. Characterization of pathogenic vibrios isolated from bivalve hatcheries in Galicia, NW Atlantic coast of Spain. Description of Vibrio tubiashii subsp. europaeus [corrected] subsp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 2015;38:26–29 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhong ZP, Liu Y, Liu HC, Wang F, Zhou YG et al. Vibrio salilacus sp. nov., a new member of the Anguillarum clade with six alleles of the 16S rRNA gene from a saline lake. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015;65:2653–2660 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. CLSI Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Twenty-Fourth Informational Supplement, CLSI document M100-S24. 2014
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002689
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002689
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplementary File 1

PDF

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error