1887

Abstract

Principle 2 of the Prokaryotic Code, as modified by the ICSP in 1999, reads: ‘The nomenclature of prokaryotes is not independent of botanical and zoological nomenclature. When naming new taxa in the rank of genus or higher, due consideration is to be given to avoiding names which are regulated by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature and the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi and plants’. But in the current version of the Prokaryotic Code no Rule implements this version of Principle 2. I therefore propose adding the following sentence to Rule 10a: ‘As from January 2001, newly proposed generic names must not be later homonyms of names in use in botany or zoology’. Recommendation 10a(3) of the Code states: ‘Avoid introducing into bacteriology as generic names such names as are in use in botany or zoology, in particular well-known names’. This Recommendation contravenes the current version of Principle 2 and the proposed new version of Rule 10a. Therefore I propose to delete Recommendation 10a(3) from the Prokaryotic Code.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002247
2017-08-25
2019-10-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/67/9/3683.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002247&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Lapage SP, Sneath PHA, Lessel EF, Skerman VBD, Seeliger HPR et al. International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1990 Revision). Bacteriological Code Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1992
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Tindall BJ. Proposals to update and make changes to the Bacteriological Code. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999;49:1309–1312 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. de Vos P, Trüper HG. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology; IXth International (IUMS) Congress of Bacteriology and Applied Microbiology. Minutes of the meetings, 14, 15 and 18 August 1999, Sydney, Australia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol2000:2239–2244
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Labeda DP. International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology; IXth International (IUMS) Congress of Bacteriology and Applied Microbiology. Minutes of the meetings, 14 and 17 August 1999, Sydney, Australia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol2000:2245–2247
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Parker CT, Tindall BJ, Garrity GM. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Prokaryotic Code (2008 Revision). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.000778
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Oren A, Garrity GM, Schink B. Proposal to modify Rule 6, Rule 10a, and Rule 12c of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014;64:1452–1453 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Oren A. Proposal to modify Rule 6, Rule 10a, and Rule 12c of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014;64:3919 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002247
Loading

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error