1887

Abstract

Two protein-coding genes, actin and translation elongation factor-1 (EF-1), as well as two ribosomal gene regions, D1/D2 domains of the large subunit and both internal transcribed spacers including the 5.8S gene region, were evaluated regarding their usefulness for reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships in the species group. This included analyses of sequence divergence values, heterogeneity of evolutionary rates and the reliability of the inferred trees. Both protein-coding genes showed greater capacities to resolve at the strain level and between the closely related species of , compared with the ribosomal gene regions. However, to obtain a fully resolved and reliable phylogenetic tree that reflected the biological relationships it was necessary to combine three congruent sequence datasets. The novel species sp. nov. (type strain CBS 8772) is described as a result of the application of various molecular approaches to delimit species. Furthermore, incongruent gene genealogies of genetically divergent strains of , as determined by amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis and DNA–DNA reassociation measurements, indicated the presence of two novel varieties, var. (type strain CBS 2592) and var. var. nov. (type strain CBS 6783), which could be distinguished by habitat preference.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.64052-0
2006-05-01
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/56/5/1157.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.64052-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baldauf S. L., Palmer J. D. 1993; Animals and fungi are each other's closest relatives: congruent evidence from multiple proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90:11558–11562 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baldauf S. L., Roger A. J., Wenk-Siefert I., Doolittle W. F. 2000; A kindom-level phylogeny of eukaryotes based on combined protein data. Science 290:972–977 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bandelj D., Jakše J., Javornik B. 2004; Assessment of genetic variability of olive varieties by microsatellite and AFLP markers. Euphytica 136:93–102 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barnett J. A., Payne R. W., Yarrow D. 2000 Yeasts: Characteristics and Identification Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Belloch C., Querol A., Garcia M. D., Barrio E. 2000; Phylogeny of the genus Kluyveromyces inferred from the mitochondrial cytochrome- c oxidase II gene. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:405–416 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Boekhout T., Kurtzman C. P. O'Donnell K., Smith M. T. 1994; Phylogeny of the yeast genera Hanseniaspora (anamorph Kloeckera ), Dekkera (anamorph Brettanomyces ), and Eeniella as inferred from partial 26S ribosomal DNA nucleotide sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44:781–786 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bush R. M., Everett K. D. E. 2001; Molecular evolution of the Chlamydiaceae . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51:203–220
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cadez N., Raspor P., de Cock A. W. A. M., Boekhout T., Smith M. Th. 2002; Molecular identification and genetic diversity within species of the genera Hanseniaspora and Kloeckera . FEMS Yeast Res 1:279–289
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cadez N., Poot G. A., Raspor P., Smith M. Th. 2003; Hanseniaspora meyeri sp. nov., Hanseniaspora clermontiae sp. nov., Hanseniaspora lachancei sp. nov. and Hanseniaspora opuntiae sp. nov. novel apiculate yeast species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:1671–1680 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Damgaard J., Cognato A. I. 2003; Sources of character conflict in a clade of water strides (Heteroptera: Gerridae). Cladistics 19:512–526 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Daniel H.-M., Meyer W. 2003; Evaluation of ribosomal RNA and actin gene sequences for the identification of ascomycetous yeasts. Int J Food Microbiol 86:61–78 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Daniel H.-M., Sorrell T. C., Meyer W. 2001; Partial sequence analysis of the actin gene and its potential for studying the phylogeny of Candida species and their teleomorphs. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51:1593–1606
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Esteve-Zarzoso B., Peris-Torán M. J., Ramón D., Querol A. 2001; Molecular characterisation of Hanseniaspora species. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 80:85–92 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Farris J. S., Kallersjo M., Kluge A. G., Bult C. 1995; Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315–319
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Felsenstein J. 1978; Cases in which parsimony and compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst Zool 27:401–410 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Felsenstein J. 1985; Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gardes M., Bruns T. D. 1993; ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes – application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Golubev W. I., Smith M. Th., Poot G. A., Kock J. L. F. 1989; Species delineation in the genus Nadsonia Sydow. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 55:369–382 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hall T. A. 1999; BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kretzer A. M., Bruns T. D. 1999; Use of atp6 in fungal phylogenetics: an example from the Boletales. Mol Phylogenet Evol 13:483–492 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kumar S., Tamura K., Jakobsen I. B., Nei M. 2001; mega2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics 17:1244–1245 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kurtzman C. P. 2003; Phylogenetic circumscription of Saccharomyces , Kluyveromyces and other members of the Saccharomycetaceae, and the proposal of the new genera Lachancea ,Nakaseomyces , Naumovia , Vanderwaltozyma and Zygotorulaspora . FEMS Yeast Res 4, 233–245 [CrossRef]
  23. Kurtzman C. P., Robnett C. J. 1998; Identification and phylogeny of ascomycetous yeasts from analysis of nuclear large subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA partial sequences. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 73:331–371 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kurtzman C. P., Robnett C. J. 2003; Phylogenetic relationships among yeasts of the ‘ Saccharomyces complex’ determined from multigene sequence analyses. FEMS Yeast Res 3:417–432 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lodder J., Kreger-van Rij N. J. W. 1952 The Yeasts, a Taxonomic Study Amsterdam: North Holland;
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Meyer S. A., Smith M. Th., Simione F. P. Jr 1978; Systematics of Hanseniaspora Zikes and Kloeckera Janke. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 44:79–96 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Misof B., Rickert A. M., Buckley T. R., Fleck G., Sauer K. P. 2001; Phylogenetic signal and its decay in mitochondrial SSU and LSU rRNA gene fragments of Anisoptera. Mol Biol Evol 18:27–37 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Möller E. M., Bahnweg G., Sandermann H., Geiger H. H. 1992; A simple and efficient protocol for isolation of high molecular weight DNA from filamentous fungi, fruit bodies, and infected plant tissues. Nucleic Acids Res 20:6115–6116 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Nakase T., Komagata K. 1970; Significance of DNA base composition in the classification of yeast genera Hanseniaspora and Kloeckera . J Gen Appl Microbiol 16:241–250 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. O'Donnell K., Cigelnik E., Nirenberg H. I. 1998; Molecular systematics and phylogeography of the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex. Mycologia 90:465–493 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Posada D., Crandall K. A. 1998; modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Reess M. 1870; Botanische Untersuchungen über die Alkoholgährungspilze . Leipzig: A; Felix (in German
  33. Rokas A., Williams B. L., King N., Carroll S. B. 2003; Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425:798–804 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Smith M. Th. 1998; Hanseniaspora Zikes. In The Yeasts, a Taxonomic Study . , 4th edn. pp  214–220 Edited by Kurtzman C. P., Fell J. W. Amsterdam: Elsevier;
  35. Swofford D. L. 2002 paup*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b10 Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates;
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Taylor J. W., Jacobson D. J., Kroken S., Kasuga T., Geiser D. M., Hibbett D. S., Fisher M. C. 2000; Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. Fungal Genet Biol 31:21–32 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Thompson J. D., Gibson T. J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin F., Higgins D. G. 1997; The clustal_x windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Vos P., Hogers R., Bleeker M. 7 other authors 1995; AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407–4414 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. White T. J., Bruns T., Lee S., Taylor J. 1990; Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: a Guide to Methods and Applications pp  315–322 Edited by Innis N., Gelfand D., Sninsky J., White T. London: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Yamada Y., Maeda K., Banno I. 1992a; The phylogenetic relationships of the Q6-equipped species in the teleomorphic apiculate yeast genera Hanseniaspora , Nadsonia , and Saccharomycodes based on the partial sequences of 18S and 26S ribosomal ribonucleic acids. J Gen Appl Microbiol 38:585–596 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Yamada Y., Maeda K., Banno I. 1992b; An emendation of Kloeckeraspora Niehaus with the type species, Kloeckeraspora osmophila Niehaus and the proposals of two new combinations, Kloeckeraspora occidentalis and Kloeckeraspora vineae (Saccharomycetaceae. Bull Jpn Fed Cult Collect 8, 79–85
  42. Yarrow D. 1998; Methods for the isolation, maintenance and identification of yeasts. In The Yeasts, a Taxonomic Study , 4th edn. pp  77–100 Edited by Kurtzman C. P., Fell J. W. Amsterdam: Elsevier;
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Zikes H. 1911; Zur Nomenclaturfrage der Apiculatushefen. Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasitenkd Abt II 30145–149 (in German)
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.64052-0
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.64052-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Supplementary material 2

PDF

Supplementary material 3

PDF

Supplementary material 4

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error