1887

Abstract

Symptoms resembling giant calyx, a graft-transmissible disease, were observed on 1–5 % of eggplant (aubergine; L.) plants in production fields in Sao Paulo state, Brazil. Phytoplasmas were detected in 12 of 12 samples from symptomatic plants that were analysed by a nested PCR assay employing 16S rRNA gene primers R16mF2/R16mR1 followed by R16F2n/R16R2. RFLP analysis of the resulting rRNA gene products (1.2 kb) indicated that all plants contained similar phytoplasmas, each closely resembling strains previously classified as members of RFLP group 16SrIII (X-disease group). Virtual RFLP and phylogenetic analyses of sequences derived from PCR products identified phytoplasmas infecting eggplant crops grown in Piracicaba as a lineage of the subgroup 16SrIII-J, whereas phytoplasmas detected in plants grown in Bragança Paulista were tentatively classified as members of a novel subgroup 16SrIII-U. These findings confirm eggplant as a new host of group 16SrIII-J phytoplasmas and extend the known diversity of strains belonging to this group in Brazil.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • , Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.019141-0
2011-06-01
2020-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/61/6/1454.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.019141-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Amaral Mello A. P. O., Ribeiro L. F. C., Massola Júnior N. S., Bedendo I. P. 2004; Um fitoplasma do grupo 16SrV associado ao superbrotamento da crotalaria. Summa Phytopathol 30:432–435 (in Portuguese)
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Amaral Mello A. P. O., Bedendo I. P., Kitajima E. W., Ribeiro L. F. C., Kobori R. 2006a; Tomato big bud associated with a phytoplasma belonging to group 16SrIII in Brazil. Int J Pest Manag 52:233–237 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Amaral Mello A. P. O., Bedendo I. P., Camargo L. E. A. 2006b; Sequence heterogeneity in the 16S rDNA of tomato big bud phytoplasma belonging to group 16SrIII. J Phytopathol 154:245–249 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Amaral Mello A. P. O., Bedendo I. P., Camargo L. E. A. 2007; Identidade molecular dos fitoplasmas associados aos enfezamentos do tomateiro e da berinjela com base na análise do gene 16S rDNA. Summa Phytopathol 33:258–263 (in Portuguese) [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Anfoka G. H. A., Khalil A. B., Fattash I. 2003; Detection and molecular characterization of a phytoplasma associated with big bud disease of tomatoes in Jordan. J Phytopathol 151:223–227 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Arocha Y., López M., Piñol B., Fernández M., Picornell B., Almeida R., Palenzuela I., Wilson M. R., Jones P. 2005; Candidatus Phytoplasma graminis’ and ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma caricae’, two novel phytoplasmas associated with diseases of sugarcane, weeds and papaya in Cuba. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:2451–2463 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Barros T. S. L., Kitajima E. W., Resende R. O. 1998; Diversidade de isolados brasileiros de fitoplasmas através da análise do 16S rDNA. Fitopatol Bras 23:459–465 (in Portuguese)
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bedendo I. P., Davis R. E., Dally E. L. 2000; Detection and identification of the maize bushy stunt phytoplasma in corn plants in Brazil using PCR and RFLP. Int J Pest Manag 46:73–76 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Boiteaux L. S., Lima M. I., Kitajima E. W. 1994; Giant calyx: a disease of eggplant (Solanum melongena) associated with a mycoplasma-like organism in Brazil. Plant Pathol 43:751–754 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Davis R. E., Dally E. R. 2001; Revised subgroup classification of group 16SrV phytoplasmas and placement of flavescence dorée-associated phytoplasmas in two distinct subgroups. Plant Dis 85:790–797 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Davis R. E., Jomantiene R., Dally E. L., Wolf T. K. 1998; Phytoplasmas associated with grapevine yellows in Virginia belong to group 16SrI, subgroup A (tomato big bud phytoplasma subgroup), and group 16SrIII, new subgroup I. Vitis 37:131–137
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Del Serrone P., Merzachi C., Bragaloni M., Galeffi P. 2001; Phytoplasma infection of tomato in central Italy. Phytopathol Mediterr 40:137–142
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Duarte V., Silva E. G., Hass I. C. R., Bedendo I. P., Kitajima E. W. 2009; First report of a group 16SrIII-B phytoplasma associated with decline of China tree in Brazil. Plant Dis 93:666 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gundersen D. E., Lee I. M. 1996; Ultrasensitive detection of phytoplasmas by nested-PCR assays using two universal primer pairs. Phytopathol Mediterr 35:144–151
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gundersen D. E., Lee I. M., Rehner S. A., Davis R. E., Kingsbury D. T. 1994; Phylogeny of mycoplasmalike organisms (phytoplasmas): a basis for their classification. J Bacteriol 176:5244–5254[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jomantiene R., Davis R. E., Valiunas D., Alminaite A. 2002; New group 16SrIII phytoplasma lineages in Lithuania exhibit rRNA interoperon sequence heterogeneity. Eur J Plant Pathol 108:507–517 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee I. M., Hammond R. W., Davis R. E. 1993; Universal amplification and analysis of pathogen 16S rDNA for classification and identification of mycoplasmalike organisms. Phytopathology 83:834–842 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee I. M., Gundersen-Rindal D. E., Hammond R. W., Davis R. E. 1994; Use of mycoplasmalike organism (MLO) group-specific oligonucleotide primers for nested PCR assay to detect mixed MLO infections in a single host plant. Phytopathology 84:559–566 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee I. M., Gundersen-Rindal D. E., Davis R. E., Bartoszyk I. M. 1998; Revised classification scheme of phytoplasma based on RFLP analyses of 16S rDNA and ribosomal protein gene sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48:1153–1169 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee I. M., Davis R. E., Gundersen-Rindal D. E. 2000; Phytoplasma: phytopathogenic mollicutes. Annu Rev Microbiol 54:221–255 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee I. M., Martini M., Marcone C., Zhu S. F. 2004; Classification of phytoplasma strains in the elm yellows group (16SrV) and proposal of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma ulmi’ for the phytoplasma associated with elm yellows. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:337–347 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Marcone C., Schneider B., Seemüller E. 2004; Candidatus Phytoplasma cynodontis’, the phytoplasma associated with Bermuda grass white leaf disease. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:1077–1082 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Montano H. G., Davis R. E., Dally E. L., Pimentel J. P., Brioso P. S. T. 2000; Identification and phylogenetic analyses of a new phytoplasma from disease chayote in Brazil. Plant Dis 84:429–436 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Montano H. G., Davis R. E., Dally E. L., Hogenhout S., Pimentel J. P., Brioso P. S. T. 2001; Candidatus Phytoplasma brasiliense’, a new phytoplasma taxon associated with hibiscus witches’ broom disease. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51:1109–1118[PubMed] [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Montano H. G., Brioso P. S. T., Pimentel J. P., Figueiredo D. V., Cunha Junior J. O. 2006; Cucurbita moschata, new phytoplasma host in Brazil. J Plant Pathol 88:226
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Namba S., Oyaizu H., Kato S., Iwanami S., Tsuchizaki T. 1993; Phylogenetic diversity of phytopathogenic mycoplasmalike organisms. Int J Syst Bacteriol 43:461–467 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Nei M., Li W.-H. 1979; Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76:5269–5273 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Okuda S., Prince J. P., Davis R. E., Dally E. L., Lee I. M., Mogen B., Kato S. 1997; Two groups of phytoplasma from Japan distinguished on the basis of amplification and restriction analysis of 16S rDNA. Plant Dis 81:301–305 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ribeiro L. F. C., Amaral Mello A. P. O., Bedendo I. P., Kitajima E. W., Massola Júnior N. S. 2003; Enfezamento em melão de São Caetano (Momordica charantia L.) associado a fitoplasma no Estado de São Paulo. Summa Phytopatol Jaboticabal 29:77 (in Portuguese)
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Seemüller E., Schneider B. 2004; Candidatus Phytoplasma mali’, ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma pyri’ and ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma prunorum’, the causal agents of apple proliferation, pear decline and European stone fruit yellows, respectively. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:1217–1226 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Seemüller E., Schneider B., Mäurer R., Ahrens U., Daire X., Kison H., Lorenz K. H., Firrao G., Avinent L. et al. 1994; Phylogenetic classification of phytopathogenic mollicutes by sequence analysis of 16S ribosomal DNA. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44:440–446 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Seemüller E., Marcone C., Lauer U., Ragozzino A., Gosch M. 1998; Current status of molecular classification of the phytoplasmas. J Plant Pathol 80:3–26
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Siddique A. B. M., Agrawal G. K., Alam N., Krishina Reddy M. 2001; Electron microscopy and molecular characterization of phytoplasmas associated with little leaf disease of brinjal (Solanum melongena) and periwinkle (Catharanthus roseus) in Bangladesh. J Phytopathol 149:237–244 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Staniulis J., Davis R. E., Jomantiene R., Kalvelyte A., Dally E. L. 2000; Single and mixed phytoplasma infections in phyllody- and dwarf-diseased clover plants in Lithuania. Plant Dis 84:1061–1066 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Tymon A. M., Jones P., Harrison N. 1998; Phylogenetic relationships of coconut phytoplasmas and the development of specific oligonucleotide PCR primers. Ann Appl Biol 132:437–452 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Wei W., Davis R. E., Lee I. M., Zhao Y. 2007; Computer-simulated RFLP analysis of 16S rRNA genes: identification of ten new phytoplasma groups. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:1855–1867 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Wei W., Lee I. M., Davis R. E., Suo X., Zhao Y. 2008; Automated RFLP pattern comparison and similarity coefficient calculation for rapid delineation of new and distinct phytoplasma 16Sr subgroup lineages. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:2368–2377 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.019141-0
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.019141-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error