1887
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/0096266X-13-1-23
1963-01-01
2024-04-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/13/1/ijs-13-1-23.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/0096266X-13-1-23&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Opinion 16 1958; Conservation of the generic name Chromobacterium Bergonzini 1880 and designation of the type species and the neotype culture of the type species. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon 8:151–152
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Opinion 17 1958; Conservation of the generic name Staphylococcus Rosenbach, designation of Staphylococcus aureus Rosenbach as the nomenclatural type of the genus Staphylococcus Rosenbach, and designation of a neotype culture of Staphylococcus aureus Rosenbach. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon 8:153–154
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Opinion 19 1958; Conservation of the generic name Rickettsia da Rocha-Lima and of the species name Rickettsia prowazekii da Rocha-Lima. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon 8:158–159
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Opinion 20 1958; Status of new generic names of bacteria published without names of included species. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon 8:160–162
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Opinion 21 1958; Conservation of the generic name Selenomonas von Prowazek. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon 8:163–165
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Opinion 22 1958; Status of the generic name Asterococcus and conservation of the generic name Mycoplasma. Intern., Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon 8:166–168
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Opinion 23 1958; Rejection of the generic names Nitromonas Winogradsky 1890 and Nitromonas Orla-Jensen 1909, conservation of the generic names Nitrosomonas Winogradsky 1892, Nitrosococcus Winogradsky 1892, and Nitrobacter Winogradsky 1892, and the designation of the type species of these genera. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon 8:169–170
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Opinion 24 1958; Rejection of the generic name Arthrobacter Fischer 1895 and conservation of the generic name Arthrobacter Conn and Dimmick 1947. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon 8:171–172
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Henriksen S. D. 1960; Moraxella. The standing in nomenclature of various proposed names. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon 10:231–235
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lautrop Hans. 1961; Bacterium anitratum transferred to the genus Cytophaga. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon 11:103–108
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Berger Ulrich. 1961; A proposed new genus of Gramnegative cocci. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon 11:17–20
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cary Sylvia G. 1961; Serological relationships of Mimeae, Moraxella, Diplococcus mucosus and Neisseria winogradskyi. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon 11:79–86
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gilmour Marion N., Arden Howell Jr., Bibby Basil G. 1961; The classification of organisms termed Leptotrichia (Leptothrix) buccalis. I. Review of the literature and proposed separation into Leptotrichia buccalis Trevisan 1879 and Bacterionema gen. nov., B. matruchotii (Mendel 1919) comb. nov. Bacteriol. Rev. 25:131–141
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gilmour Marion N., Arden Howell Jr., Bibby Basil G. 1961; Proposal for designation of neotype strains of Leptotrichia buccalis and Bacterionema matruchotii. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon 11:161–164
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kauffmann F. 1959; Definition of genera and species of Enterobacteriaceae. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon. 9:7–8
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Editorial Board 1959; Designation of neotype cultures of the type species of certain genera of the family Enterobacteriaceae: Salmonella, Shigella, Arizona, Escherichia, Citrobacter and Proteus. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon. 9:105–109
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Williams R. E. O. 1961; Report of panel on choice of type culture for Streptococcus agalactiae Lehmann and Neumann. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon. 11:21
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hormaeche E., Edwards P. R. 1960; A proposed genus Enterobacter. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon. 10:71–74
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hormaeche E., Edwards P. R. 1960; Proposal for the rejection of the generic name Cloaca Castellani and Chalmers and proposal of Enterobacter as a generic name with designation of type species and of its type culture. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon. 10:75–76
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Editorial Board. 1962; The correct name for the meningococcus (Diplococcus intracellularis meningitidis Weichselbaum). Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon. 12:37–46
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Pridham T. G., Lyons A. J. Jr 1960; Streptomyces albus (Rossi Doria emend. Krainsky) Waksman et Henrici: Taxonomic study of 42 strains labelled Streptomyces albus. (Abstr.) Bacteriol. Proc. 1960:80
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Pridham T. G., Lyons A. J. Jr 1961; Streptomyces albus (Rossi Doria) Waksman et Henrici: Taxonomic study of strains labelled Streptomyces albus. Jour. Bact. 81:431–441
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Waksman S. A. 1961; The Actinomycetes—Classification, Identification and De scription of Genera and Species. The Williams and Wilkins Co.; Baltimore:363
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hütter R. 1961; Zur Systematik der Actinomyceten 5. Die Art Streptomyces albus (Rossi Doria emend. Krainsky) Waksman and Henrici 1943. Archiv. für Mikrobiologie 38:367–383
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lyons A. J. Jr., Pridham T. G. 1961; Proposal to designate strain ATCC 618 as the neotype strain of Streptomyces albus (Rossi Doria) Waksman et Henrici. (Abst.) Bacteriol. Proc. 1961:74
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lyons A. J. Jr., Pridham T. G. 1962; Proposal to designate strain ATCC 3004 (IMRU 3004) as the neotype strain of Streptomyces albus (Rossi Doria) Waksman et Henrici. Jour. Bact. 83:370–380
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pridham T. G., Lyons A. J. Jr. 1962; Proposal to designate strain 3004 (IMRU 3004) as the neotype strain of Streptomyces albus (Rossi Doria) Waksman and Henrici. Intern. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Taxon 12:123–126
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Balcke J. 1884; Uber fauligen Geruch des Bieres. Wachnschr. f. Brauerei 1:257
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hammer B. W. 1930; Volatile acid production of S. lactis and the organisms associated with it in starters. Iowa Agric. Expt. Sta. Res. Bull No. 63, 91.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hucker G. J., Pederson C. S. 1930; Studies on the Coccaceae. XVI The genus Leuconostoc. New York State Agric. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bull. 167:67
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Felton E. A., Niven C. F. Jr. 1953; The identity of “Leuconostoc citrovorum, strain 8081.”. Jour. Bact. 65:482
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Günther H. L., White H. R. 1961a; The cultural and physiological characters of the pediococci. Jour. Gen. Microbiol. 26:185
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Günther H. L., White H. R. 1961b; Serological characters of the pediococci. Jour. Gen. Microbiol 26:199
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/0096266X-13-1-23
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error