1887

Abstract

The genomic DNAs of 95 culture collection and hospital subsp. strains of various origins, as well as the genomic DNAs of other coagulase-positive species, were cleaved with restriction endonuclease I and subjected to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. The levels of similarity of the I restriction patterns of the subsp. strains varied from 30 to 100%, which is considered characteristic of this species; thus, these organisms belonged to the same species restriction group. Within this range of similarity values 13 intraspecies restriction groups were identified, and each group consisted of strains whose levels of similarity ranged from 65 to 100%. subsp. CCM 885 (T = type strain) belonged to the major intraspecies restriction group that comprised 39% of the strains which we studied. The strains of the other coagulase-positive staphylococci, including subsp. , and subsp. , clustered with their type strains in separate restriction groups. subsp. exhibited almost no similarity to these species. We found 44-kb I fragments in all of the subsp. and subsp. strains studied, and these fragments are considered characteristic of the species The high level of homology of these fragments was confirmed by the results of DNA hybridization experiments in which we used representatives of individual intraspecies restriction groups. Of the other staphylococci studied, only and one strain of contained these fragments. However, the levels of homology between these fragments and the fragments of were found to be very low.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-46-1-216
1996-01-01
2022-08-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/46/1/ijs-46-1-216.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-46-1-216&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Asheshov E. H., Winkler K. C. 1966; Staphylococcus aureus strains in the ‘52, 52A, 80, 81 complex. Nature (London) 209:638–639
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brandis H., Lenz W. 1984 Staphylokokken-Bakteriophagen. 186–214 Meyer W.ed Staphylokokken und Staphylokokken-Erkrankungen VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag; Jena, Germany:
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Carles-Nurit M. J., Christophle B., Broche S., Gouby A., Bouziges N., Ramuz M. 1992; DNA polymorphism in methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol 30:2092–2096
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Degener J. E., Heck M. E. O. C., Vanleeuwen W. J., Heemskerk C., Crielaard A., Joosten P., Caesar P. 1994; Nosocomial infection by Staphylococcus haemolyticus and typing methods for epidemiological study. J. Clin. Microbiol 32:2260–2265
    [Google Scholar]
  5. de la Fuente R., Suarez G., Schleifer K. H. 1985; Staphylococcus aureus subsp. anaerobius subsp. nov., the causal agent of abscess disease of sheep. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 35:99–102
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Devriese L. A., Hajek V., Oeding P., Meyer S. A., Schleifer K. H. 1978; Staphylococcus hyicus (Sompolinsky 1953) comb. nov. and Staphylococcus hyicus subsp. chromogenes subsp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 28:482–490
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dominguez M. A., Delencastre H., Linares J., Tomasz A. 1994; Spread and maintenance of a dominant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clone during an outbreak of MRSA disease in a Spanish hospital. J. Clin. Microbiol 32:2081–2087
    [Google Scholar]
  8. EI-Adhami W., Roberts L., Vickery A., Inglis B., Gibbs A., Stewart P. R. 1991; Epidemiological analysis of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus outbreak using restriction fragment length polymorphism of genomic DNA. J. Gen. Microbiol 137:2713–2720
    [Google Scholar]
  9. George C. G., Kloos W. E. 1994; Comparison of the Sm.I-digested chromosomes of Staphylococcus epidemidis and the closely related species Staphylococcus capitis and Staphylococcus caprae. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 44:404–409
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goering R. V., Duensing T. D. 1990; Rapid field inversion gel electrophoresis in combination with an rRNA gene probe in the epidemiological evaluation of staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol 28:426–429
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hajek V. 1976; Staphylococcus intermedius, a new species isolated from animals. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 26:401–408
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hall L. M., Jordens J. Z., Wang F. 1989; Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from China characterized by digestion of total DNA with restriction enzymes. Epidemiol. Infect 10:183–192
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hesselbarth J., Witte W., Cuny C., Rohde R., Amtsberg G. 1994; Characterization of Staphylococcus intermedius from healthy dogs and cases of superficial pyoderma by DNA restriction endonuclease patterns. Vet. Microbiol 41:259–266
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Holt J. G., Krieg N. R., Sneath P. H. A., Staley J. T., Williams S. T. 1994 Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. , 9th.527–557 The Williams & Wilkins Co.; Baltimore:
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ichiyama S., Ohta M., Shimokata K., Kato N., Takeuchi J. 1991; Genomic DNA fingerprinting by pulsed-field gei electrophoresis as an epidemiological marker for study of nosocomial infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol 29:2690–2695
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Igimi S., Takahashi E., Mitsuoka T. 1990; Staphylococcus schleiferi subsp. coagulans subsp. nov., isolated from the external auditory meatus of dogs with external ear otitis. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 40:409–411
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Iwahara T., Ichiyama S., Nada T., Shimokata K., Nakashima N. 1994; Clinical and epidemiologic investigations of nosocomial pulmonary infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Chest 105:826–831
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jones J. M., Yost S. C., Pattee P. A. 1987; Transfer of the conjugal tetracycline resistance transposon Tn916 from Streptococcus faecalis to Staphylococcus aureus and identification of some insertion sites in the staphylococcal chromosome. J. Bacteriol 169:2121–2131
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Khambaty F. M., Bennett R. W., Shah D. B. 1994; Application of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to the epidemiological characterization of Staphylococcus intermedius implicated in a food-related outbreak. Epidemiol. Infect 113:75–81
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lina B., Bes M., Vandenesch F., Greenland T., Etienne J., Fleurette J. 1993; Role of bacteriophages in genomic variability of related coagulasenegative staphylococci. FEMS Microbiol. Lett 109:273–277
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lina B., Vandenesch F., Etienne J., Kreiswirth B., Fleurette J. 1992; Comparison of coagulase-negative staphylococci by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett 92:133–138
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Linhardt F., Ziebuhr W., Meyer P., Witte W., Hacker J. 1992; Pulsedfield gel electrophoresis of genomic restriction fragments as a tool for the epidemiological analysis of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. FEMS Microbiol. Lett 95:181–186
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Marples R. R., van Leeuwen W. J. 1987; International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology Subcommittee on Phage Typing of Staphylococci. Minutes of the meeting. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 37:174–175
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Nei M., Li W.-H. 1979; Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:5269–5273
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Pattee P. A. 1993 Genetic and physical map of Staphylococcus aureus NCTC 8325. 2.106–2.113 O’Brien S. J.ed Genetic maps, 6th. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y:
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Pattee P. A., Lee H.-C., Bannantiene J. P. 1990 Genetic and physical mapping of the chromosome of Staphylococcus aureus,. 41–58 Novick R. P.ed Molecular biology of the staphylococci VCH Publishers; New York:
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Prevost G., Jaulhac B., Piemont Y. 1992; DNA fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis is more effective than ribotyping in distinguishing among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol 30:967–973
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rosdahl V. T., Witte W., Musser M., Jarlov J. O. 1994; Staphylococcus aureus strains of type 95, Spread of a single clone. EpidemioL Infect 113:463–470
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Saulnier P., Bourneix C., Prevost G., Andremont A. 1993; Random amplified polymorphic DNA assay is less discriminant than pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol 31:982–985
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Schlichting C., Branger C., Fournier J.-M., Witte W., Boutonnier A., Wolz C., Goullet P., Doring G. 1993; Typing of Staphylococcus aureus by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, zymotyping, capsular typing, and phage typing: resolution of clonal relationships. J. Clin, Microbiol 31:227–232
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Schwarzkopf A., Karch H., Schmidt H., Lenz W., Heesemann J. 1993; Phenotypical and genotypical characterization of epidemic clumping factornegative, oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J, Clin. Microbiol 31:2281–2285
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Smeltzer M. S., Hart M. E., landolo J. J. 1994; The effect of lysogeny on the genomic organization of Staphylococcus aureus. Gene 138:51–57
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Snopkova S., Gotz F., Doskar J., RosypaL S. 1994; Pulsed field gel electrophoresis of the genomic restriction fragments of coagulase-negative staphylococci. FEMS Microbiol. Lett 124:131–140
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Stewart P. R., El-Adhami W., Inglis B., Franklin J. C. 1993; Analysis of an outbreak of variably methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with chromosomal RFLPs and mec region probes. J. Med. Microbiol 38:270–277
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Struelens M. J., Bax R., Deplano A., Quint W. G. V., van Belkum A. 1993; Concordant clonal delineation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by macrorestriction analysis and polymerase chain reaction genome fingerprinting. J. Clin. Microbiol 31:1964–1970
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Struelens M. J., Deplano A., Godard C., Maes N., Serruys E. 1992; Epidemiologic typing and delineation of genetic relatedness of methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus by macrorestriction analysis of genomic DNA using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol 30:2599–2605
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Upholt W. B. 1977; Estimation of DNA sequence divergence from comparison of restriction endonuclease digests. Nucleic Acids Res 4:1257–1265
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Varaldo P. E., Kiipper-Balz R., Biavasco F., Satta G., Schleifer K. H. 1988; Staphylococcus delphini sp. nov., a coagulase-positive species isolated from dolphins. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 38:436–439
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Wada A., Ohta H., Kulthanan K., Hiramatsu K. 1993; Molecular cloning and mapping of 16S-23S rRNA gene complexes of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol 175:7483–7487
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wanger A. R., Morris S. L., Ericson C., Singh K. V., LaRocco M. T. 1992; Latex agglutination-negative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus recovered from neonates: epidemiologic features and comparison of typing methods. J. Clin. Microbiol 30:2583–2588
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-46-1-216
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-46-1-216
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error