Inability of the Polyphasic Approach to Systematics To Determine the Relatedness of the Genera Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus

References

1. Akhurst R. J., Boemare N. E. 1988; A numerical taxonomic study of the genus Xenorhabdus (Enterobacteriaceae) and proposed elevation of the subspecies of X. nematophilus to species. J. Gen. Microbiol. 134:1835–1845
   [Google Scholar]
2. Boemare N. E., Akhurst R. J. 1988; Biochemical and physiological characterization of colony form variants in Xenorhabdus spp. (Enterobacteriaceae). J. Gen. Microbiol. 134:751–761
   [Google Scholar]
3. Boemare N. E., Akhurst R. J., Mourant R. G. 1993; DNA relatedness between Xenorhabdus spp. (Enterobacteriaceae), symbiotic bacteria of entomopathogenic nematodes, and a proposal to transfer X. luminescens to a new genus, Photorhabdus gen. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 43:249–255
   [Google Scholar]
4. De Soete G. 1983; A least squares algorithm for fitting additive trees to proximity data. Psychometrika 48:621–626
   [Google Scholar]
5. Ehlers U.-R., Wyss U., Stackebrandt E. 1988; 16S rRNA cataloging and the phylogenetic position of Xenorhabdus . Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 10:121–125
   [Google Scholar]
6. Farmer J. J., Jorgensen J. H., Grimont P. A., Akhurst R. J., Poinar G. O., Ageron E., Pierce G. V., Smith J. A., Carter G. P., Wilson K. L., Hickman-Brenner F. W. 1989; Xenorhabdus luminescens (DNA hybridization group) from human clinical specimens.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 27:1594–1602
   [Google Scholar]
7. Grimont P. A., Steigerwalt A. G., Boemare N. E., Hickman-Brenner F. W., Deval C., Grimont F., Brenner D. 1984; Deoxyribonucleic acid relatedness and phenotypic study of the genus Xenorhabdus . Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 34:378–388
   [Google Scholar]
8. Jukes T. H., Cantor C. R. 1969; Evolution of protein molecules,. 21–132 Munro H. N. Mammalian protein metabolism Academic Press; New York:
   [Google Scholar]
9. Larsen N., Olsen G. J., Maidak B. L., McCaughey M., Overbeek J. R., Macke T. J., Marsh T. L., Woese C. R. 1993; The ribosomal database project. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:3021–3023
   [Google Scholar]
10. Munson M. A., Baumann P., Kinsey M. G. 1991; Buchnera gen. nov. and Buchnera aphidicola sp. nov., a taxon consisting of the mycetocyte-associated, primary endosymbionts of aphids. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 41:566–568
    [Google Scholar]
11. Rainey F. A., Dorsch M., Morgan H. W., Stackebrandt E. 1992; 16S rDNA analysis of Spirochaeta thermophila: its phylogenetic position and implications for the systematics of the order Spirochaetales . Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 15:197–202
    [Google Scholar]
12. Saitou N., Nei M. 1987; The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406–425
    [Google Scholar]
13. Stackebrandt E., Liesack W., Witt D. 1992; Ribosomal RNA and ribosomal DNA sequence analyses. Gene 115:255–260
    [Google Scholar]
14. Stackebrandt E., Ludwig W. 1994; The importance of using outgroup reference organisms in phylogenetic studies: the Atopobium case. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 17:39–43
    [Google Scholar]
15. Stackebrandt E., Woese C. R. 1981; The evolution of prokaryotes,. 1–31 Carlile M. J., Collins J. F., Moseley B. E. B. Molecular and cellular aspects of microbial evolution Cambridge University Press; Cambridge:
    [Google Scholar]
16. Suzuki T., Yamanaka S., Nishimura Y. 1990; Chemotaxonomic study of Xenorhabdus species—cellular fatty acids, ubiquinone and DNA-DNA hybridization. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 36:393–401
    [Google Scholar]
17. Woese C. R., Achenbach L., Rouviere P., Mandelco L. 1991; Archaeal phylogeny: reexamination of the phylogenetic position of Archaeoglobus fulgidus in the light of certain composition-induced artifacts. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 14:364–371
    [Google Scholar]