1887

Abstract

A total of 61 strains, including members of all five currently described pathogenicity groups of pv. citri (groups A, B, C, D, and E) and representing a broad geographical diversity, were compared by using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of whole-cell proteins, gas chromatographic analysis of fatty acid methyl esters, and DNA-DNA hybridization. We found that all of the pathogenicity groups were related to each other at levels of DNA binding of more than 60%, indicating that they all belong to one species. Our results do not confirm a previous reclassification of pathogens isolated from citrus in two separate species (Gabriel et al., Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 39:14-22, 1989). Pathogenicity groups A and E could be clearly delineated by the three methods used, and group A was the most homogeneous group. The delineation of pathogenicity groups B, C, and D was not clear on the basis of the results of sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of proteins and gas chromatography of fatty acid methyl esters, although these groups constituted a third subgroup on the basis of the DNA homology results.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-41-4-535
1991-10-01
2022-05-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/41/4/ijsem-41-4-535.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-41-4-535&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Civerolo E. L. 1984; Bacterial canker disease of citrus. J. Rio Grande Vai. Hortic. Soc. 37:127–146
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Civerolo E. L. Unpublished data
  3. Civerolo E. L., Fan F. 1982; Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri detection and identification by enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay. Plant Dis. 66:231–236
    [Google Scholar]
  4. De Ley J. 1970; Reexamination of the association between melting point, buoyant density, and chemical base composition of deoxyribonucleic acid. J. Bacteriol. 101:738–754
    [Google Scholar]
  5. De Ley J., Cattoir H., Reynaerts A. 1970; The quantitative measurement of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates. Eur. J. Biochem. 12:133–142
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Egel D. S., Graham J. H., Riley T. D. 1991; Population dynamics of strains of Xanthomonas campestris differing in aggressiveness on Swingle citrumelo and grapefruit. Phytopathology 81:666–671
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gabriel D. W., Hunter J., Kingsley M., Miller J., Lazo G. 1988; Clonal population structure of Xanthomonas campestris and genetic diversity among citrus canker strains. Mol. Plant Microbe Interactions 1:59–65
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gabriel D. W., Kingsley M. T., Hunter J. E., Gottwald T. 1989; Reinstatement of Xanthomonas citri (ex Hasse) and X. phaseoli (ex Smith) to species and reclassification of all X. campestris pv. citri strains. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 39:14–22
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Goto M., Takahashi T., Messina M. 1980; A comparative study of the strains of X. campestris pv. citri isolated from citrus canker in Japan and cancrosis B in Argentina. Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Jpn. 46:329–338
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gottwald T. R., Civerolo E. L., Garnsey S. M., Brlansky R. H., Graham J. H., Gabriel D. W. 1988; Dynamics and spatial distribution of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri group E strains in simulated nursery and new grove situations. Plant Dis. 72:781–787
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Graham J. H., Gottwald T. R. 1990; Variation in aggressiveness of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citrumelo associated with citrus bacterial spot in Florida citrus nurseries. Phytopathology 80:190–196
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Graham J. H., Hartung J. S., Stall R. E., Chase A. R. 1990; Pathological, restriction-fragment length polymorphism, and fatty acid profile relationships between Xanthomonas campestris from citrus and noncitrus hosts. Phytopathology 80:829–836
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hartung J. S., Civerolo E. L. 1987; Genomic fingerprints of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri strains from Asia, South America and Florida. Phytopathology 77:282–285
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hartung J. S., Civerolo E. L. 1989; Restriction fragment length polymorphisms distinguish Xanthomonas campestris strains isolated from Florida citrus nurseries from X. c. pv. citri. Phytopathology 79:793–799
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Korn-Wendisch F., Kempf A., Grund E., Kroppenstedt R. M., Kutzner H. J. 1989; Transfer of Faenia rectivirgula Kurup and Agre 1983 to the genus Saccharopolyspora Lacey and Goodfellow 1975, elevation of Saccharopolyspora hirsuta subsp. taberi Labeda 1987 to species level, and emended description of the genus Saccharopolyspora. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 39:430–441
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lazo G. R., Roffey R., Gabriel D. W. 1987; Restriction fragment length polymorphisms distinguish pathovars of Xanthomonas campestris. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 37:214–221
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Marmur J. 1961; A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from microorganisms. J. Mol. Biol. 3:208–218
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Schoulties C. L., Civerolo E. L., Miller J. W., Stall R. E., Krass C. J., Poe S. R., DuCharme E. P. 1987; Citrus canker in Florida. Plant Dis. 71:388–395
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Schoulties C. L., Miller J. W., Stall R. E., Civerolo E. L., Sasser M. 1985; A new outbreak of citrus canker in Florida. Plant Dis. 69:361
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Sneath P. H. A., Sokal R. R. 1973 The principles and practice of numerical classification. W. H. Freeman; San Francisco:
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Stall R. E., Seymour C. P. 1983; Canker, a threat to citrus in the Gulf-Coast states. Plant Dis. 67:581–585
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Stead D. E. 1989; Grouping of Xanthomonas campestris pathovars of cereals and grasses by fatty acid profiling. Bull. OEPP (Organ. Eur. Mediterr. Prot. Plant.)/EPPO (Eur. Mediterr. Plant Prot. Organ.) Bull. 19:57–68
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Vauterin L., Swings J., Kersters K. 1991; Grouping of Xanthomonas campestris pathovars by SDS-PAGE of proteins. J. Gen. Microbiol. 137:1677–1687
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Vauterin L., Swings J., Kersters K., Gillis M., Mew T. W., Schroth M. N., Palleroni N. J., Hildebrand D. C., Stead D. E., Civerolo E. L., Hayward A. C., Maraite H., Stall R. E., Vidaver A. K., Bradbury J. F. 1990; Towards an improved taxonomy of Xanthomonas. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 40:312–316
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Young J. M., Bradbury J. F., Gardan L., Gvozdyak R. I., Stead D. E., Takikawa Y., Vidaver A. K. 1991; Comment on the reinstatement of Xanthomonas citri (ex Hasse 1915) and X. phaseoli (ex Smith 1897) Gabriel et al. 1989: indication of the need for minimal standards for the genus Xanthomonas. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 41:172–177
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-41-4-535
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-41-4-535
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error