1887

Abstract

Abstract

The taxonomic position of strains that produce soluble black pigment is unclear. To assess the genetic relatedness between the pigmented and nonpigmented strains, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) reassociation was measured spectrophotometrically. Among the 40 pigmented strains examined, two distinct DNA relatedness groups were found. A total of 25 strains (group 1) showed 24 to 34% DNA relatedness and 15 strains (group 2) showed 70 to 100% relatedness to type strain NRRL NRS-744. The intragroup DNA relatedness values for each group ranged from 85 to 100%; the intergroup relatedness values ranged from 20 to 35%. A multilocus enzyme electrophoresis analysis revealed a low level of similarity between group 1 and group 2 or the nonpigmented group. The group 2 strains and the nonpigmented strains clustered in a common group, indicating the close genetic relationship of these organisms. My results strongly suggest that group 2 is a pigmented variant of , but group 1 is a new species, for which the name is proposed. The type strain of the new species is strain NRRL NRS-213.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-39-3-295
1989-07-01
2022-09-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/39/3/ijs-39-3-295.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-39-3-295&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Arai T., Mikami Y. 1972; Chromogenicity of Streptomyces. Appl. Microbiol. 23:402–406
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baptist J. N., Mandel M., Gherna R. L. 1978; Comparative zone electrophoresis of enzymes in the genus Bacillus. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 28:229–244
    [Google Scholar]
  3. De Ley J., Cattoir H., Reynaerts A. 1970; The quantitative measurement of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates. Eur. J. Biochem. 12:133–142
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fahmy F., Flossdorf J., Claus D. 1985; The DNA base composition of the type strains of the genus Bacillus. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 6:60–65
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gordon R. E., Haynes W. C., Pang C. H. 1973 The genus Bacillus. Agriculture Handbook No. 427 U.S. Department of Agriculture; Washington, D.C.:
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Haynes W. C., Wickerham L. J., Hesseltine C. W. 1955; Maintenance of cultures of industrially important microorganisms. Appl. Microbiol. 3:361–368
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Nakamura L. K., Swezey J. 1983; Taxonomy of Bacillus circulans Jordon 1890: base composition and reassociation of deoxyribonucleic acid. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 3:46–52
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Priest F. G., Goodfellow M., Todd C. 1988; A numerical classification of the genus Bacillus. J. Gen. Microbiol. 134:1847–1882
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Schildkraut C. L., Marmur J., Doty P. 1962; Determination of the base composition of deoxyribonucleic acid from its buoyant density in CsCl. J. Mol. Biol. 4:430–443
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Schmidt D. D., Frommer W., Miller L., Truscheit E. 1979; Glucosidase-Inhibitoren aus Bazillen. Naturwissenschaften 66:584–585
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Selander R. K., Caugant D. A., Ochman H., Musser J. M., Gilmour M. N., Whittman T. S. 1986; Methods of multilocus enzyme electrophoresis for bacterial population genetics and systematics. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 51:873–884
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Skerman V. B. D., McGowan V., Sneath P. H. A. 1980; Approved lists of bacterial names. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 30:225–420
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Smith N. R., Gordon R. E., Clark F. E. 1946 Aerobic mesophilic sporeforming bacteria. Miscellaneous Publication No. 559 U.S. Department of Agriculture; Washington, D.C.:
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Sneath P. H. A., Sokal R. R. 1973 Numerical taxonomy W. H. Freeman and Co.; San Francisco:
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-39-3-295
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-39-3-295
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error