1887

Abstract

An investigation of 20 bovine and 24 ovine isolates of organisms variously described as “,” ,” and “” revealed no consistent host-related differences in 47 biochemical characteristics; however, agarose gel electrophoresis of predominantly plasmid-derived deoxyribonucleic acid demonstrated the presence of variable numbers of plasmids of divergent size in each of the ovine strains but in none of the bovine isolates. Restriction enzyme analysis of deoxyribonucleic acids from an ovine culture and a bovine culture also suggested chromosomal differences. Our observations support the concept of one species, , comprising ovine and bovine isolates, but point to the existence of subspecific divisions related to host predilection.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-39-3-236
1989-07-01
2023-06-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/39/3/ijs-39-3-236.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-39-3-236&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Biberstein E. L. 1981; Haemophilus somnus and Haemophilus agni. 125–132 Kilian M., Frederiksen W., Biberstein E. L. Haemophilus, Pasteurelia, Actinobacillus Academic Press, Inc. (London), Ltd.; London:
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Birnboim H. C. 1983; A rapid alkaline extraction method for the isolation of plasmid DNA. Methods Enzymol. 100:243–255
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Canto J., Biberstein E. L., Schulte T. A., Behymer D. 1983; Cross-reactivity of Haemophilus somnus antibody in agglutination and complement fixation tests and in the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 17:500–506
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Claxton P. D., Everett R. E. 1966; Recovery of an organism resembling Histophilus ovis in a ram. Aust. Vet. J. 42:457–458
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Corboz L., Nicolet J. 1975; Infektionen mit sogenanntem Haemophilus somnus beim Rind: Isolierung und Charakterisierung von Stämmen aus Respirations- und Geschlechtsorganen. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilkd. 117:493–503
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cowan S. T., Steel K. J. 1965 Manual for the identification of medical bacteria112 University Press; Cambridge:
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Garcia-Delgado G. A., Little P. B., Barnum D. A. 1977; A comparison of various Haemophilus somnus strains. Can. J. Comp. Med. 41:380–388
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Guerry P., VanEmbden J., Falkow S. 1974; Molecular nature of two nonconjugative plasmids carrying drug resistance genes. J. Bacteriol. 117:619–630
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hendrickson D. A. 1985; Reagents and stains. 1093 Lennette E. H., Balows A., Haussier W. J., Shadomy H. J. Manual of clinical microbiology, 4th ed.. American Society for Microbiology; Washington, D.C.:
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Higgins R., Godbout-DeLasalle F., Messier S., Couture Y., Lamothe P. 1981; Isolation of Histophilus ovis from vaginal discharges in ewes. Can. Vet. J. 22:395–396
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kado C. I., Liu S.-T. 1981; Rapid procedure for detection and isolation of large and small plasmids. J. Bacteriol. 145:1365–1373
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kennedy P. C., Biberstein E. L., Howarth J. A., Frazier L. M., Dungworth D. L. 1960; Infectious meningoencephalitis in cattle, caused by a HaemophilusAike organism. Am. J. Vet. Res. 21:403–409
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kennedy P. C., Frazier L. M., Theilen G. H., Biberstein E. L. 1958; A septicemic disease of lambs caused by Haemophilus agni (new species). Am. J. Vet. Res. 19:645–654
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kiupel H., Prehn I. 1986; Zur Haemophilus somnus-Infektion des Rindes—Bakteriologische Untersuchungsergebnisse unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Abortussubstraten. Arch. Exp. Veterinaermed. 40:164–169
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lautrop H. 1960; Laboratory diagnosis of whooping-cough or Bordetella infections. Bull. W. H. O. 23:15–31
    [Google Scholar]
  16. LeFebvre R. B., Foley J. W., Thiermann A. B. 1985; Rapid and simplified protocol for isolation and characterization of leptospiral chromosomal DNA for taxonomy and diagnosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 22:606–608
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Linneweber B., Weiss R., Schliesser T. 1986; Bakteriologische Untersuchungen über Vorkommen, Biochemie, und Antibiotika-Resistenz von Haemophilus somnus (spec, incertae sed) bei Rindern. Berl. Muench. Tieraerztl. Wochenschr. 99:221–225
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lundberg M. S. 1986; Isolation of Haemophilus agni from six Alberta ram lambs with septicemia. Can. Vet. J. 27:501–503
    [Google Scholar]
  19. McGillivery D. J., Weber J. J., Dean H. F. 1987; Characterization of Histophilus ovis and related organisms by restriction endonuclease analysis. Aust. Vet. J. 63:389–393
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Piechulla K., Mutters R., Burbach S., Klussmeier R., Pohl S., Mannheim W. 1986; Deoxyribonucleic acid relationships of “Histophilus ovis/Haemophilus somnus,” Haemophilus haemoglobinophilus, and Actinobacillus seminis. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 36:1–17
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rahaley R. S., White W. E. 1977; Histophilus ovis infection in sheep in Western Victoria. Aust. Vet. J. 53:124–127
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Rauth S., Bisping W., Kirpal G. 1986; Bakteriologische Untersuchungen über die Verbreitung von Haemophilus somnus im Genitaltrakt von Rindern. Berl. Muench. Tieraerztl. Wochenschr. 99:405–408
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Roberts D. S. 1956; A new pathogen from a ewe with mastitis. Aust. Vet. J. 32:330–332
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Shigidi M. A., Hoerlein A. B. 1970; Characterization of the Haemophilus-like organism of thromboembolic meningoencephalitis of cattle. Am. J. Vet. Res. 31:1017–1022
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Stephens L. R., Humphrey J. D., Little P. B., Barnum D. A. 1983; Morphological, biochemical, antigenic, and cytochemical relationships among Haemophilus somnus, Haemophilus agni, Haemophilus haemoglobinophilus, Histophilus ovis, and Actinobacillus seminis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 17:728–737
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Walker R. L., Biberstein E. L., Pritchett R. F., Kirkham C. 1985; Deoxyribonucleic acid relatedness among “Haemophilus somnus,” “Haemophilus agni,” “Histophilus ovis,” “Actinobacillus seminis,” and Haemophilus influenzae. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 35:46–49
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Wayne L. G., Brenner D. J., Colwell R. R., Grimont P. A. D., Kandier O., Krichevsky M. I., Moore L. H., Moore W. E. C., Murray R. G. E., Stackebrandt E., Starr M. P., Trüper H. G. 1987; Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Reconciliation of Approaches to Bacterial Systematics. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 37:463–464
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Webb R. F. 1983; Bacteriological characteristics of Histophilus ovis and its relationship to similar bacteria. Res. Vet. Sci. 35:25–29
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-39-3-236
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-39-3-236
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error