1887

Abstract

comprises homofermentative strains from animals which are recognized by their polypeptide patterns. Physiologically these strains resemble and , but are distinguished from the former by guanine-plus-cytosine content and from the latter by peptidoglycan type. Deoxyribonucleic acid-deoxyribonucleic acid homology confirmed that is a homogeneous taxon distinct from .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-36-3-481
1986-07-01
2022-08-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/36/3/ijsem-36-3-481.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-36-3-481&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Back W., Stackebrandt E. 1978; DNS-DNS homologiestudien innerhalb der Gattung Pediococcus. Arch. Microbiol. 118:79–85
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cato E. P., Moore W. E. C., Johnson J. L. 1983; Synonym of strains of “Lactobacillus acidophilus” group A2 (Johnson et al. 1980) with the type strain of Lactobacillus crispatus (Brygoo and Aladame 1953) Moore and Holdeman 1970. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 33:426–428
    [Google Scholar]
  3. De Man J. C., Rogosa M., Sharpe M. E. 1960; A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 23:130–135
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dent V. E., Williams R. A. D. 1982; Lactobacillus animalis sp. nov., a new species of lactobacillus from the alimentary canal of animals. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infektionskr. Hyg. Abt. 1 Orig. Reihe C 3:377–386
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dent V. E., Williams R. A. D. 1984; Actinomyces howellii sp. nov., from the dental plaque of diary cattle. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 34:316–320
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hemme D., Raibaud P., Ducluzeau R., Galpin J.-V., Sicard P., van Meijenoort J. 1980; Lactobacillus murinus n. sp., une nouvelle espece de la flore dominante autochtone du tube digestif du rat et de la souris. Ann. Microbiol. (Paris) 131A:297–308
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Johnson J. L., Phelps C. F., Cummins C. S., London J., Gasser F. 1980; Taxonomy of the Lactobacillus acidophilus group. Int. J. Syst. Bateriol. 30:53–68
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lauer E., Helming C., Kandier O. 1980; Heterogeneity of the species Lactobacillus acidophilus (Moro) Hansen and Moguot as revealed by biochemical characeristics and DNADNA hybridisation. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infektionskr. Hyg. Abt. 1 Orig. Reihe C 1:150–168
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mandel M., Marmur J. 1968; The use of ultraviolet absorbance - temperature profile for determining the guanine plus cytosine content of DNA. Methods Enzymol 12B:195–206
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Owen R. J., Hill L. R. 1979; The estimation of base compositions, base pairing and genome sizes of bacterial deoxyribonucleic acids. Soc. Appl. Bacteriol. Tech. Ser. 14:277–296
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sarra P. G., Magri M., Bottazzi V., Dellaglio F. 1980; Genetic heterogeneity among Lactobacillus acidophilus strains. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek J. Microbiol. Serol. 46:169–176
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Stackebrandt E., Fiedler F. 1979; DNA-DNA homology studies among strains of Arthrobacter and Brevibacterium. Arch. Microbiol. 120:289–295
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-36-3-481
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-36-3-481
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error