1887

Abstract

This report covers those requests for an Opinion that were published between July 1979 and April 1981 upon which a vote has been taken. Occasional status reports will be published identifying requests that have been resolved.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-32-4-464
1982-10-01
2023-02-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/32/4/ijs-32-4-464.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-32-4-464&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Canale-Parola E. 1981; Proposal that Spirochaeta stenostrepta Zuelzer replace Spirochaeta plicatilis Ehrenberg as the type species of the genus Spirochaeta Ehrenberg. Request for an Opinion. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 31:105–106
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cato E. P., Holdeman L. V., Moore W. E. C. 1979; Proposal of neotype strains for seven non-saccharolytic Bacteroides species. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 29:427–434
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cato E. P., Holdeman L. V., Moore W. E. C. 1981; Designation of Eubacterium limosum (Eggerth) Prevot as the type species of Eubacterium . Request for an Opinion. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 31:209–210
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Goodfellow M., Trüper H. G. 1982; Escherichiaceae nom. nov., a name to replace Enterobacteriaceae . Request for an Opinion. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 32:383
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Grimont P. A. D., Grimont F., Starr M. P. 1981; Comment on a request to the Judicial Commission to conserve the specific epithet liquefaciens over the specific epithet proteamaculans in the name of the organism currently known as Serratia liquefaciens . Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 31:211–212
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Holmes B. 1980; Proposal to conserve the specific epithet liquefaciens over the specific epithet proteamaculans in the name of the organism currently known as Serratia liquefaciens (Grimes and Hennerty 1931) Bascomb et al 1971. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 30:220–222
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Holmes B., Owen R. J. 1979; Proposal that Flavobacterium breve be substituted as the type species of the genus in place of Flavobacterium aquatile and emended description of the genus Flavobacterium: status of the named species of Flavobacterium . Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 29:416–426
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology 1981; Present standing of the family name Enterobacteriaceae Rahn 1937. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 31:104
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lapage S. P. 1979; Proposal of Enterobacteraceae nom. nov. as a substitute for the illegitimate but conserved name Enterobacteriaceae Rahn 1937. Request for an Opinion 1979. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 29:265–266
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lapage S. P., Sneath P. H. A., Lessel E. F., Skerman V. B. D., Seeliger H. P. R., Clark W. A. 1975 International code of nomenclature of bacteria, 1975 revision American Society for Microbiology; Washington, D.C.:
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Larkin J. M., Borrail R. 1979; Proposal of ATCC 25396 as the neotype strain of Microcyclus aquaticus Ørskov 1928. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 29:414–415
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Skerman V. B. D., McGowan V., Sneath P. H. A. 1980; Approved lists of bacterial names. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 30:225–420
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-32-4-464
Loading

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error