1887

Abstract

Examination of three groups of catalase-positive campylobacters by phase-contrast microscopy showed significant differences in cell size between the groups. These differences were most striking when the spiral forms of the organisms were observed. consistently produced small, tightly coiled spirals with a mean wavelength and amplitude of 1.12 and 0.48 µm, respectively. subsp. produced intermediate-sized spirals (mean wavelength and amplitude of 1.80 and 0.55 µm, respectively); subsp. produced the largest spirals (mean wavelength and amplitude of 2.43 and 0.73 µm, respectively). Organisms belonging to the different groups could be distinguished by a trained observer on the basis of size alone, without actual measurement. Two additional features which distinguish from subsp. and subsp. are the tendencies of to swarm on moist agar plates and to undergo rapid coccal transformation in normal atmospheric air. These findings should help in clarifying the subdivision of catalase-positive campylobacters and in making a rapid presumptive species or subspecies identification.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-31-1-64
1981-01-01
2024-12-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/31/1/ijs-31-1-64.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-31-1-64&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Butzler J. P., Skirrow M. B. 1979; Campylobacter enteritis. Clin. Gastroenterol 8:737–765
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chang W., Ogg J. E. 1970; Transduction and mutation to glycine tolerance in Vibrio fetus. Am. J. Vet. Res 32:649–653
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Florent A. 1959; Les deux vibrioses genitales: la vibriose venerienne due a V. fetus venerialis et la vibriose d’origine intestinale due a V. fetus intestinalis. Meded Veeartsenijsch. Rijksuniv. Gent 3:1–60
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jones F. S., Orcutt M., Little R. B. 1931; Vibrios (Vibrio jejuni, n. sp.) associated with intestinal disorders of cows and calves. J. Exp. Med 53:853–863
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Karmali M. A., Fleming P. C. 1979; Campylobacter enteritis in children. J. Pediatr 94:527–533
    [Google Scholar]
  6. King E. O. 1957; Human infections with Vibrio fetus and a closely related Vibrio. J. Infect. Dis 101:119–128
    [Google Scholar]
  7. King E. O. 1962; The laboratory recognition of Vibrio fetus and a closely related Vibrio isolated from cases of human vibriosis. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci 98:700–711
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kramer C. Y. 1956; Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal number of replications. Bio-metrics 12:307–310
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lapage S. P., Sneath P. H. A., Lessel E. F., Skerman V. B. D., Seeliger H. P. R., Clark W. A. 1975 International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria American Society for Microbiology; Washington, D.C:
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Neill S. D., Ellis W. A., O’Brien J. J. 1978; The biochemical characteristics of Campylobacter-like organisms from cattle and pigs. Res. Vet. Sci 25:368–372
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Neill S. D., Ellis W. A., O’Brien J. J. 1979; Designation of aerotolerant Campylobacter-like organisms from porcine and bovine abortions to the genus Campylobacter. Res. Vet. Sci 27:180–186
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Skerman V. B. D., McGowan V., Sneath P. H. A. 1980; Approved lists of bacterial names. Int. J. System. Bacteriol 30:225–420
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Smibert R. M. 1974; Campylobacter. p 207–212 In Buchanan R. E., Gibbons N. E. ed Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. , 8th ed.. The Williams & Wilkins Co; Baltimore:
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Smibert R. B. 1978; The genus Campylobacter. Annu. Rev. Microbiol 32:673–709
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith T. 1918; Spirilla associated with disease of the fetal membranes in cattle (infectious abortion). J. Exp. Med 28:701–719
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Smith T., Taylor M. S. 1919; Some morphological and biological characters of the spirilla (Vibrio fetus, n. sp.) associated with disease of the fetal membranes in cattle. J. Exp. Med 30:299–311
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Vanhoof R., Vanderlinden M. P., Dierickx R., Lauwers S., Yourassowsky E., Butzler J. P. 1978; Susceptibility of Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni to twenty-nine antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 14:553–556
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Veron M., Chatelain R. 1973; Taxonomic study of the genus Campylobacter Sebald and Veron and designation of the neotype strain for the type species, Campylobacter fetus (Smith and Taylor) Sebald and Veron. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol 23:122–134
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-31-1-64
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-31-1-64
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error