1887

Abstract

Ten nonfluorescent strains isolated from water-soaked lesions on cotyledons of plants of five (watermelon) plant introductions were characterized and compared phenotypically with 22 other pseudomonads. The strains were distinguished phenotypically from other known plant pathogenic pseudomonads. The watermelon bacterium was aerobic. Cells were rod-shaped, gram negative, and motile by means of a single polar flagellum. They were nonfluorescent and grew at 41°C but not at 4°C. Oxidase production and the 2-ketogluconate reaction were positive. The 10 strains utilized β-alanine, L-leucine, D-serine, -propanal, ethanol, ethanolamine, citrate, and fructose for growth. No growth occurred with sucrose or glucose. Their deoxyribonucleic acid base composition was 66 ± 1 mol% guanine plus cytosine. The bacterium is phenotypically similar to but differs from it in being pathogenic to watermelon, (cantaloupe), (cucumber), and (squash). The name subsp. is proposed for the new subspecies, of which strain C-42 (= ATCC 29625) is the type strain.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-28-1-117
1978-01-01
2022-12-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/28/1/ijs-28-1-117.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-28-1-117&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Blenden P. C., Goldberg H. S. 1965; Silver impregnation stain for Leptospira flagella. J. Bacteriol. 89:899–900
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Breed R. S., Murray E. G. D., Smith N. R.ed 1957 Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology, 7th. The Williams & Wilkins Co.; Baltimore:
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Buchanan R. E., Gibbons N. E.ed 1974 Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. , 8th. The Williams & Wilkins Co.; Baltimore:
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carpenter P. L. 1975 Immunology and serology. , 3rd. W. G. Saunders Co.; Philadelphia:
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Citarella R. V., Colwell R. R. 1970; Polyphasic taxonomy of the genus Vibrio’, polynucleotide sequence relationships among selected Vibrio species. J. Bacteriol. 104:434–442
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dedman R. E., Holmes A. W., Dienhardt F. 1965; Preparation of fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled globulin by dialysis, gel filtration, and ion-exchange chromatography. J. Bacteriol. 89:734–738
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dickey R. S., Nelson P. E. 1970; Pseudomonas caryophylli in carnation. IV. Unidentified bacteria isolated from carnation. Phytopathology 60:647–653
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldman M. 1968 Fluorescent antibody methods. 157–158 Academic Press Inc.; New York:
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hopkins D. L., Schenck N. C. 1972; Bacterial leaf spot of watermelon caused by Pseudomonas lachry- mans. Phytopathology 62:542–545
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kado C. I., Heskett M. G. 1970; Selective media for isolation of Agrobacterium, Corynebacterium, Erwinia, Pseudomonas, and Xanthomonas. Phytopathology 60:969–976
    [Google Scholar]
  11. King E. O., Ward M. K., Raney D. E. 1954; Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 44:301–307
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Klement Z. 1968; Pathogenicity factors in regards to relationships of phytopathogenic bacteria. Phytopathology 58:1218–1221
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Klement Z., Karkas G. L., Lourekovich L. 1964; Hypersensitive reaction induced by phytopathogenic bacteria in the tobacco leaf. Phytopathology. 54:474–477
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Murmur J., Doty P. 1962; Determination of the base composition of deoxyribonucleic acid from its thermal denaturation temperature. J. Mol. Biol. 5:109–118
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Misaghi I., Grogan R. G. 1969; Nutritional and biochemical comparisons of plant-pathogenic and saprophytic fluorescent pseudomonads. Phytopathology 59:1436–1450
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Palleroni N. J., Doudoroff M. 1972; Some properties and taxonomic subdivisions of the genus Pseudomonas. 77–78 Baker K. F.ed Annual review of phytopathology 10:
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ralston-Barrett E., Palleroni N. J., Doudo-roff M. 1976; Phenotypic characterization and deoxyribonucleic acid homologies of the “Pseudomonas alcali- genes” group. Int J. Syst. Bacteriol. 26:421–426
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Sands D., Schroth M. N., Hildebrand D. C. 1970; Taxonomy of phytopathogenic pseudomonads. J. Bacteriol. 101:9–23
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Schaad N. W., Kado C. L, Sumner D. R. 1975; Synonymy of Pseudomonas avenae Manns 1905 and Pseudomonas alboprecipitans Rosen 1922. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 25:133–137
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Stanier R. Y., Palleroni N. J., Doudoroff M. 1966; The aerobic pseudomonads: a taxonomic study. J. Gen. Microbiol 43:159–271
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Thomason B., Wells J. G. 1971; Preparation and testing of polyvalent conjugates for fluorescentantibody detection of salmonellae. Appl. Microbiol. 22:876–884
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Webb R. E., Goth R. W. 1965; A seed-bome bacterium isolated from watermelon. Plant Dis. Reptr. 49:818–821
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Wilson E. E., Zeitoun M., Fredrickson D. L. 1967; Bacterial phloem canker, a new disease of Persian walnut trees. Phytopathology 57:618–621
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-28-1-117
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-28-1-117
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error