The neotype strain for Staphylococcus epidermidis (Winslow and Winslow 1908) Evans 1916

References

1. Andrewes F. W., Gordon M. H. 1907 Report on the biological characters of the staphylococci pathogenic for man. 35th Ann. Rept. of the Loc. Gov. Board Containing Rept. Med. Off. for the Years 1905-1906. Supple. 543-60.
2. Baird-Parker A. C. 1965; Subcommittee on Taxonomy of Staphylococci and Micrococci Minutes of first Meeting (5th-6th October, 1964). Intl. Bull. Bact. Noman. Tax. 15:107–108
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baird-Parker A. C. 1965; Subcommittee on Taxonomy of Staphylococci and Micrococci. Recommendations. Intl. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Tax. 15:109–110
   [Google Scholar]
4. Buchanan R. E. 1958; Conservation of the generic name Staphylococcus Rosenbach, designation of Staphylococcus aureus Rosenbach as the nomenclatural type of the genus Staphylococcus Rosenbach, and the designation of a neotype culture of Staphylococcus aureus Rosenbach. Opinion 17. Intl. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Tax. 8:138
   [Google Scholar]
5. Christensen W. B. 1946; Urea decomposition as a means of differentiating Proteus, and paracolon cultures from each other and from Salmonella and Shigella types. J. Bact. 52:461–466
   [Google Scholar]
6. Evans A. C. 1916; The bacteria of milk freshly drawn from normal udders. J. Inf. Dis. 18:437–476
   [Google Scholar]
7. Glenny A. T., Stevens M. F. 1935; Staphylococcus toxins and antitoxins. J. Path. and Bact. 40:201–210
   [Google Scholar]
8. M. H Gordon. 1905; Report of some characters by which various Streptococci and Staphylococci may be differentiated and identified. 33rd Ann. Rept. Loc. Gov. Board Containing the Rept. Med. Off. for the Years 1903-1904. Supple388–430
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hugh R., Leifson E. 1953; The taxonomic significance of fermentative versus oxidative metabolism of carbohydrates by various gram-negative bacteria. J. Bact. 66:24–26
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hugh R., Ellis M. A. 1967; The neotype strain for Staphylococcus epidermidis (Winslow and Winslow 1908) Evans 1916. Bact. Proc. Amer. Soc. Microbiol. Abstracts of the 67th meeting,. New York:62
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hugh R., Reese R. 1967; Designation of the type strain for Bacterium anitratum Schaub and Hauber 1948. Intl. J. System. Bact. 17:245–254.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Jeffries C. D., Holtman D. F., Guse D. G. 1957; Rapid method for determining the activity of microorganisms on nucleic acids. J. Bact. 73:590–591
    [Google Scholar]
13. Jones D., Deibel R. H., Niven C. F. Jr. 1963; Identity of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Bact. 85:62–67
    [Google Scholar]
14. MacConkey A. 1905; Lactose-fermenting bacteria in faeces. J. Hyg. 5:333–379
    [Google Scholar]
15. Rosenbach F. J. 1884; Mikro-organismen bei den WundInfections-Krankheiten des Menschen. J. F. Bergmann. Weisbaden.1–122
    [Google Scholar]
16. Silvestri L. G., Hill L. R. 1965; Agreement between deoxyribonucleic acid base composition and taxonomic classification of gram-positive cocci. J. Bact. 90:136–140
    [Google Scholar]
17. Swann A. 1954; The use of a bile-aesculin medium and of Maxted’s technique of Lancefield grouping in the identification of enterococci (Group D Streptococci). J. Clin. Path. 7:160–163
    [Google Scholar]
18. Winslow C. E. A., Winslow A. R. 1908; The Systematic Relationships of the Coccaceae. John Wiley and Sons; New York:1–300
    [Google Scholar]