1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

Strains already studied by Pridham and Lyons for the proposal of a neotype have been re-examined. We maintain that the descriptions of strains conform exactly with those published by Gasperini and Rossi Doria. Therefore we reject objections brought up in this connection by Pridham and Lyons. However we accept strain ATCC 3004 as the neotype of . .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-15-1-1
1965-01-01
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/15/1/ijs-15-1-1.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-15-1-1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baldacci E. 1939; Contributo alla Sistematica degli Attinomiceti. V - A. albus. Atti 1st. Bot. Univ. Pavia 11:192–215
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baldacci E. 1958; Sviluppi nella classificazione degli attinomiceti. Ann. Fac. Agraria Milano 7(N. S.) 49–69
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Drechsler C. 1919; Morphology of the genus Actinomyces. II. Bot. Gaz. 67:147–169
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gasperini G. 1890; Recherches Morphologiques et Biologiques sur un Microorganisme de l’atmosphère, le Streptothrix foersteri-Cohn: Ann. Micrographie. 2:449–473
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hütter R. 1961; Zur Systematik der Actinomyceten - 5. Die Art Streptomyces albus (Rossi Doria emend. Krainsky). Arch. Mikrobiol 38:367–383
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Krainsky A. 1914; Die Aktinomyceten und ihre Bedeutung in der Natur. Zentr. Bakteriol. Parasitenk. Abt. II 41649–688
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Küster E., Williams T. 1964; Production of hydrogen sulfide by Streptomycetes and methods for its detection. Applied Microbiol 12:46–52
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Krasil’nikov N. A. 1959; Diagnostik der Bakterien und Actinomyceten. Jena. 1949 Russian Ed. Moscow:
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lyons A. J. Jr., Pridham T. G. 1962; Proposal to designate strain ATCC 3004 (IMRU 3004) as the neotype strain of Streptomyces albus (Rossi Doria) Waksman and Henrici. Jour. Bacteriol 83:370–380
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Pridham T. G., Lyons A. J. Jr. 1961; Streptomyces albus (Rossi Doria) Waksman et Henrici: Taxonomic study of strains labeled Streptomyces albus. Jour. Bacteriol. 81:431–441
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Pridham T. G., Lyons A. J. Jr. 1962; Proposal to designate strain ATCC 3004 (IMRU 3004) as the neotype strain of Streptomyces albus (Rossi Doria) Waksman and Henrici. Internatl. Bull. Bact. Nomen. Tax. 12:123–126
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Rossi Doria T. 1891; Su di alcune specie di “Streptotrix” trovate nell’aria e studiate in rapporto a quelle già note e specialmente all’ “Actinomyces. “ Ann. Igiene. 3:399–439
    [Google Scholar]
  13. SAB-Manual of Microbiological Methods. McGraw-Hill; New York: 1957
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Tendler M. D., Burkholder P. R. 1961; Studies on the thermophilic actinomycetes. 1. Methods of cultivation. Appl. Microbiol. 9:394–399
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Turri M., Silvestri L. 1960; Osservazioni su un saggio biochimico proposto per la classificazione degli Actinomiceti. Ann. Microbiol. Enzimol. 10:71–76
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Waksman S. A. 1919; Cultural studies of species of Actinomyces. Soil Sci. 8:71–215
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Waksman S. A. 1962; The Actinomycetes. II:
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-15-1-1
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/00207713-15-1-1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error