1887

Abstract

A unique feature found in the genomes of mycobacteriophages such as L5 belonging to the A cluster is the presence of multiple dispersed repeated elements known as stoperators. The phage repressor binds these repeat elements, shutting off transcription globally and thereby promoting lysogeny. Interestingly, the sequence of these stoperators closely matches that of the consensus −35 region of prokaryotic promoters, leading us to propose that they may have a role to play in the initiation of transcription by serving as RNA polymerase binding sites. Mycobacteriophage D29 is closely related to phage L5, and their genome organizations are very similar. As in L5, there are multiple stoperators in the genome of D29. The positions occupied by the stoperators in the two genomes are almost identical. The significant difference between the two phages is that D29 lacks the gene encoding the equivalent of the L5 repressor. Since phage D29 does not produce a repressor, we considered it to be a suitable model for testing our hypothesis that the stoperators function as promoters in the absence of the repressor. To prove our point, we targeted CRISPR guide RNAs against six stoperators. In the case of five out of the six, we found a significant reduction in downstream gene expression and phage growth. Based on this observation and primer extension assays, we conclude that promoting gene expression is likely to be the primary function of stoperators.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001276
2022-11-30
2024-05-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/168/11/mic001276.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001276&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Sellers MI, Tokunaga T. Further studies of infectious DNA extracted from mycobacteriophages. J Exp Med 1966; 123:327–340 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. TOKUNAGA T, SELLERS M. Infection of Mycobacterium smegmatis with D29 Phage DNA. J Exp Med 1964; 119:139–149 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ford ME, Sarkis GJ, Belanger AE, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF. Genome structure of mycobacteriophage D29: implications for phage evolution. J Mol Biol 1998; 279:143–164 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hatfull GF, Sarkis GJ. DNA sequence, structure and gene expression of mycobacteriophage L5: a phage system for mycobacterial genetics. Mol Microbiol 1993; 7:395–405 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown KL, Sarkis GJ, Wadsworth C, Hatfull GF. Transcriptional silencing by the mycobacteriophage L5 repressor. EMBO J 1997; 16:5914–5921 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Oppenheim AB, Kobiler O, Stavans J, Court DL, Adhya S. Switches in bacteriophage lambda development. Annu Rev Genet 2005; 39:409–429 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Mavrich TN, Hatfull GF. Evolution of superinfection immunity in cluster A mycobacteriophages. mBio 2019; 10:e00971-19 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Harley CB, Reynolds RP. Analysis of E. coli promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 1987; 15:2343–2361 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bhawsinghka N, Dutta A, Mukhopadhyay J, Das Gupta SK. A transcriptomic analysis of the mycobacteriophage D29 genome reveals the presence of novel stoperator-associated promoters in its right arm. Microbiology 2018; 164:1168–1179 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Samaddar S, Grewal RK, Sinha S, Ghosh S, Roy S et al. Dynamics of mycobacteriophage-mycobacterial host interaction: evidence for secondary mechanisms for host lethality. Appl Environ Microbiol 2016; 82:124–133 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Choudhary E, Thakur P, Pareek M, Agarwal N. Gene silencing by CRISPR interference in Mycobacteria. Nat Commun 2015; 6:6267 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bhattacharya B, Giri N, Mitra M, Gupta SKD. Cloning, characterization and expression analysis of nucleotide metabolism-related genes of mycobacteriophage L5. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2008; 280:64–72 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Vigouroux A, Bikard D. CRISPR tools to control gene expression in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2020; 84:e00077-19 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Nesbit CE, Levin ME, Donnelly-Wu MK, Hatfull GF. Transcriptional regulation of repressor synthesis in mycobacteriophage L5. Mol Microbiol 1995; 17:1045–1056 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ghosh S, Shaw R, Sarkar A, Gupta SKD. Evidence of positive regulation of mycobacteriophage D29 early gene expression obtained from an investigation using a temperature-sensitive mutant of the phage. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2020; 367:21 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Peters JM, Colavin A, Shi H, Czarny TL, Larson MH et al. A comprehensive, CRISPR-based functional analysis of essential genes in bacteria. Cell 2016; 165:1493–1506 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Li X, Mei H, Chen F, Tang Q, Yu Z et al. Transcriptome landscape of Mycobacterium smegmatis. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:2505 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001276
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001276
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error