1887

Abstract

The yeast Pichia pastoris (syn. Komagataella spp.) is a popular cell factory for recombinant protein production. Yeasts in general provide a good starting point for cell factory engineering. They are intrinsically robust and easy to manipulate and cultivate. However, their secretory pathway is not evolutionarily adapted to high loads of secretory protein. In particular, more complex proteins, like the antibody fragment (Fab) used in this study, overwhelm the folding and secretion capacity. This triggers cellular stress responses, which may cause excessive intracellular degradation. Previous results have shown that, in fact, about 60 % of the newly synthesized Fab is intracellularly degraded. Endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation (ERAD) is one possible intracellular degradation pathway for proteins aimed for secretion. We therefore targeted ERAD for cell factory engineering and investigated the impact on recombinant protein secretion in P. pastoris. Three components of the ERAD-L complex, which is involved in the degradation of luminal proteins, and a protein involved in proteasomal degradation, were successfully disrupted in Fab-secreting P. pastoris. Contrary to expectation, the effect on secretion was marginal. In the course of more detailed investigation of the impact of ERAD, we took a closer look at the intracellular variants of the recombinant protein. This enabled us to further zero in on the issue of intracellular Fab degradation and exclude an overshooting ER quality control. We propose that a major fraction of the Fab is actually degraded before entering the secretory pathway.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.000630
2018-03-13
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/164/4/453.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.000630&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Davy AM, Kildegaard HF, Andersen MR. Cell factory engineering. Cell Syst 2017; 4: 262– 275 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Matthews CB, Wright C, Kuo A, Colant N, Westoby M et al. Reexamining opportunities for therapeutic protein production in eukaryotic microorganisms. Biotechnol Bioeng 2017; 114: 2432– 2444 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Demain AL, Vaishnav P. Production of recombinant proteins by microbes and higher organisms. Biotechnol Adv 2009; 27: 297– 306 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Delic M, Göngrich R, Mattanovich D, Gasser B. Engineering of protein folding and secretion-strategies to overcome bottlenecks for efficient production of recombinant proteins. Antioxid Redox Signal 2014; 21: 414– 437 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Wells E, Robinson AS. Cellular engineering for therapeutic protein production: product quality, host modification, and process improvement. Biotechnol J 2017; 12: [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Rabert C, Weinacker D, Pessoa A, Farías JG. Recombinants proteins for industrial uses: utilization of Pichia pastoris expression system. Braz J Microbiol 2013; 44: 351– 356 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Puxbaum V, Mattanovich D, Gasser B. Quo vadis? The challenges of recombinant protein folding and secretion in Pichia pastoris. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2015; 99: 2925– 2938 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Pfeffer M, Maurer M, Köllensperger G, Hann S, Graf AB et al. Modeling and measuring intracellular fluxes of secreted recombinant protein in Pichia pastoris with a novel 34S labeling procedure. Microb Cell Fact 2011; 10: 47 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Pfeffer M, Maurer M, Stadlmann J, Grass J, Delic M et al. Intracellular interactome of secreted antibody Fab fragment in Pichia pastoris reveals its routes of secretion and degradation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2012; 93: 2503– 2512 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Xie W, Ng DT. ERAD substrate recognition in budding yeast. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2010; 21: 533– 539 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bodnar N, Rapoport T. Toward an understanding of the Cdc48/p97 ATPase. F1000Res 2017; 6: 1318 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang M, Yu Q, Liu Z, Liang C, Zhang B et al. UBX domain-containing proteins are involved in lipid homeostasis and stress responses in Pichia pastoris. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2017; 90: 136– 144 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Baldridge RD, Rapoport TA. Autoubiquitination of the Hrd1 ligase triggers protein retrotranslocation in ERAD. Cell 2016; 166: 394– 407 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Travers KJ, Patil CK, Wodicka L, Lockhart DJ, Weissman JS et al. Functional and genomic analyses reveal an essential coordination between the unfolded protein response and ER-associated degradation. Cell 2000; 101: 249– 258 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Graf A, Gasser B, Dragosits M, Sauer M, Leparc GG et al. Novel insights into the unfolded protein response using Pichia pastoris specific DNA microarrays. BMC Genomics 2008; 9: 390 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gasser B, Maurer M, Rautio J, Sauer M, Bhattacharyya A et al. Monitoring of transcriptional regulation in Pichia pastoris under protein production conditions. BMC Genomics 2007; 8: 179 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dragosits M, Stadlmann J, Graf A, Gasser B, Maurer M et al. The response to unfolded protein is involved in osmotolerance of Pichia pastoris. BMC Genomics 2010; 11: 207 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Marsalek L, Gruber C, Altmann F, Aleschko M, Mattanovich D et al. Disruption of genes involved in CORVET complex leads to enhanced secretion of heterologous carboxylesterase only in protease deficient Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol J 2017; 12: [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gasser B, Prielhofer R, Marx H, Maurer M, Nocon J et al. Pichia pastoris: protein production host and model organism for biomedical research. Future Microbiol 2013; 8: 191– 208 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Heiss S, Maurer M, Hahn R, Mattanovich D, Gasser B. Identification and deletion of the major secreted protein of Pichia pastoris. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2013; 97: 1241– 1249 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Friedlander R, Jarosch E, Urban J, Volkwein C, Sommer T. A regulatory link between ER-associated protein degradation and the unfolded-protein response. Nat Cell Biol 2000; 2: 379– 384 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L, Connelly C, Riles L et al. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 2002; 418: 387– 391 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Carvalho ND, Arentshorst M, Kooistra R, Stam H, Sagt CM et al. Effects of a defective ERAD pathway on growth and heterologous protein production in Aspergillus niger. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011; 89: 357– 373 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gauss R, Jarosch E, Sommer T, Hirsch C. A complex of Yos9p and the HRD ligase integrates endoplasmic reticulum quality control into the degradation machinery. Nat Cell Biol 2006; 8: 849– 854 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mehnert M, Sommermeyer F, Berger M, Kumar Lakshmipathy S, Gauss R et al. The interplay of Hrd3 and the molecular chaperone system ensures efficient degradation of malfolded secretory proteins. Mol Biol Cell 2015; 26: 185– 194 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hahn JS, Neef DW, Thiele DJ. A stress regulatory network for co-ordinated activation of proteasome expression mediated by yeast heat shock transcription factor. Mol Microbiol 2006; 60: 240– 251 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Plemper RK, Bordallo J, Deak PM, Taxis C, Hitt R et al. Genetic interactions of Hrd3p and Der3p/Hrd1p with Sec61p suggest a retro-translocation complex mediating protein transport for ER degradation. J Cell Sci 1999; 112: 4123– 4134 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Apodaca J, Kim I, Rao H. Cellular tolerance of prion protein PrP in yeast involves proteolysis and the unfolded protein response. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006; 347: 319– 326 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kruegel U, Robison B, Dange T, Kahlert G, Delaney JR et al. Elevated proteasome capacity extends replicative lifespan in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 2011; 7: e1002253 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Fitzgerald I, Glick BS. Secretion of a foreign protein from budding yeasts is enhanced by cotranslational translocation and by suppression of vacuolar targeting. Microb Cell Fact 2014; 13: 125 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lin-Cereghino GP, Stark CM, Kim D, Chang J, Shaheen N et al. The effect of α-mating factor secretion signal mutations on recombinant protein expression in Pichia pastoris. Gene 2013; 519: 311– 317 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Willer M, Jermy AJ, Steel GJ, Garside HJ, Carter S et al. An in vitro assay using overexpressed yeast SRP demonstrates that cotranslational translocation is dependent upon the J-domain of Sec63p. Biochemistry 2003; 42: 7171– 7177 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. de Ruijter JC, Frey AD. Analysis of antibody production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effects of ER protein quality control disruption. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2015; 99: 9061– 9071 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Gluschankof P, Fuller RS. A C-terminal domain conserved in precursor processing proteases is required for intramolecular N-terminal maturation of pro-Kex2 protease. Embo J 1994; 13: 2280– 2288 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Gasser B, Maurer M, Gach J, Kunert R, Mattanovich D. Engineering of Pichia pastoris for improved production of antibody fragments. Biotechnol Bioeng 2006; 94: 353– 361 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Hosomi A, Fujita M, Tomioka A, Kaji H, Suzuki T. Identification of PNGase-dependent ERAD substrates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem J 2016; 473: 3001– 3012 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Feige MJ, Hendershot LM, Buchner J. How antibodies fold. Trends Biochem Sci 2010; 35: 189– 198 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Röthlisberger D, Honegger A, Plückthun A. Domain interactions in the Fab fragment: a comparative evaluation of the single-chain Fv and Fab format engineered with variable domains of different stability. J Mol Biol 2005; 347: 773– 789 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Love KR, Politano TJ, Panagiotou V, Jiang B, Stadheim TA et al. Systematic single-cell analysis of Pichia pastoris reveals secretory capacity limits productivity. PLoS One 2012; 7: e37915 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Zahrl RJ, Peña DA, Mattanovich D, Gasser B. Systems biotechnology for protein production in Pichia pastoris. FEMS Yeast Res 2017; 17: [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Hohenblum H, Gasser B, Maurer M, Borth N, Mattanovich D. Effects of gene dosage, promoters, and substrates on unfolded protein stress of recombinant Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol Bioeng 2004; 85: 367– 375 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Resina D, Bollók M, Khatri NK, Valero F, Neubauer P et al. Transcriptional response of P. pastoris in fed-batch cultivations to Rhizopus oryzae lipase production reveals UPR induction. Microb Cell Fact 2007; 6: 21 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Ast T, Aviram N, Chuartzman SG, Schuldiner M. A cytosolic degradation pathway, prERAD, monitors pre-inserted secretory pathway proteins. J Cell Sci 2014; 127: 3017– 3023 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Whyteside G, Alcocer MJ, Kumita JR, Dobson CM, Lazarou M et al. Native-state stability determines the extent of degradation relative to secretion of protein variants from Pichia pastoris. PLoS One 2011; 6: e22692 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Ravid T, Kreft SG, Hochstrasser M. Membrane and soluble substrates of the Doa10 ubiquitin ligase are degraded by distinct pathways. Embo J 2006; 25: 533– 543 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Habeck G, Ebner FA, Shimada-Kreft H, Kreft SG. The yeast ERAD-C ubiquitin ligase Doa10 recognizes an intramembrane degron. J Cell Biol 2015; 209: 261– 273 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Tang H, Bao X, Shen Y, Song M, Wang S et al. Engineering protein folding and translocation improves heterologous protein secretion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 2015; 112: 1872– 1882 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Gardner RG, Swarbrick GM, Bays NW, Cronin SR, Wilhovsky S et al. Endoplasmic reticulum degradation requires lumen to cytosol signaling. Transmembrane control of Hrd1p by Hrd3p. J Cell Biol 2000; 151: 69– 82 [PubMed] [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Dohmen RJ, Willers I, Marques AJ. Biting the hand that feeds: Rpn4-dependent feedback regulation of proteasome function. Biochim Biophys Acta 2007; 1773: 1599– 1604 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Maccani A, Landes N, Stadlmayr G, Maresch D, Leitner C et al. Pichia pastoris secretes recombinant proteins less efficiently than Chinese hamster ovary cells but allows higher space-time yields for less complex proteins. Biotechnol J 2014; 9: 526– 537 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.000630
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.000630
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error