1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

The interphase nucleus of is U-shaped with a lens-shaped central body lying between the arms of the U. At the beginning of division the chromosomes become arranged around the central body and can be seen to be split into pairs of chromatids which are held together by relational coiling. The pairs lie across the plane of the equator. The beginning of anaphase is obscure but as the chromatids separate into the daughter nuclei they exhibit a variety of arrangements which seem to exclude the possibility of localized centromere and normal spindle. The central body divides into two at this stage. During telophase the ball of chromosomes breaks open and the chromosomes lose some condensation as they twist together and the U-shaped interphase nucleus is re-established. In some of these features Gonyaulax differs from other dinoflagellates which have been studied as well as exhibiting a vastly different nuclear division to that found in higher organisms. The central body behaves like the endosome of the Euglenophyta but also has similarities with the central spindle reported from certain flagellates and diatoms.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-36-2-269
1964-08-01
2022-01-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/36/2/mic-36-2-269.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-36-2-269&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Calkins G. N. 1899; Mitosis in Noctiluca milearis and its bearing on the nuclear relations of the Protozoa and Metazoa. J. Morph 15:711
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cleveland L. R. 1958; A factual analysis of chromosomal movement in Barbulanympha. J. Protozool 5:47
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dodge J. D. 1963a; The nucleus and nuclear division in the Dinophyceae. Arch. Protistenk 106:442
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dodge J. D. 1963b; Chromosome counts in some marine Dinoflagellates. Bol. marina 5:121
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dodge J. D. 1964; Chromosome structure in the Dinophyceae. II. Cytochemical studies. Arch. Mikrobiol 48:66–80
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Geitler L. 1927; Reductionsteilung, Copulation und Parthenogenese bei Cocconcis placentula. Arch. Protistenk 59:506
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hall R. P. 1925; Binary fission in Oxyrrhis marina Dujardin. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool 26:281
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hastings J. W., Sweeney B. M. 1964; Phased cell division in the marine Dinoflagellates. In Synchrony in Cell Division New York: J. Wiley;
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ishikawa C. 1894; Studies of reproductive elements. II. Noctiluca milearis, its division and spore formation. J. Coll. Sci. Imp. Univ. Japan 6:297
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lauterborn R. 1896 Untersuchungen über Bau, Kernteilung und Beicegung der Diatomeen Leipzig: W. Engelmann;
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lebour M. 1925 The Dinoflagellates of Northern Seas Plymouth: Mar. biol. Assn. (UK);
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Leedale G. F. 1958; Nuclear structure and mitosis in the Euglenineae. Arch. Mikrobiol 32:32
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Skoczylas O. 1958; Über die Mitose von Ceratium cornutum und einigen anderen Peridineen. Arch. Protistenk 103:193
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Stosch H. A. von. 1958; Zum Chromosomenformwechsel der Dinophyten sowie zur Mechanik und Terminologie von Schrauben. Arch. Protistenk 103:229
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-36-2-269
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-36-2-269
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error