1887

Abstract

Summary: Strains of tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) obtained from systemically-infected leguminous plants in Nigeria and India changed their properties greatly when propagated in different hosts. From systemically-infected tobacco, they closely resemble type TMV and share many antigens with it, but from systemically-infected French bean, they differ from it by at least as much as any previously described strains. The different forms of the viruses share few antigens, have different amino acid constitutions, electrophoretic behaviour and resistance to inactivation by ultraviolet radiation, and they produce different kinds of local lesion in . Isolates derived from single local lesions behave like the original bulk cultures, and as the changes are also reversible they seem unlikely to occur simply because different hosts select different strains from existing mixtures. The electrophoretic patterns, particularly of preparations from beans, show that infected plants contain more than one anomalous product; both forms of the viruses may be produced in all hosts, but there is no evidence that sap from systemically-infected beans contains the tobacco forms in amounts needed to cause infection. The change after transfer to a new host apparently occurs because mutants produced in that host are favoured over the infecting form because they move more readily and become systemic. The bean forms multiply more extensively in tobacco at above 30° than at 20° and above 30° seem not to produce forms that give a systemic mosaic; many tobacco plants at 20° develop only local lesions, and systemic infection, indicating the occurrence of the tobacco forms, happens more often in young seedlings than when mature plants are inoculated.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-18-3-751
1958-06-01
2022-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/18/3/mic-18-3-751.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-18-3-751&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bawden F.G. 1956; Reversible, host-induced, changes in a strain of tobacco mosaic virus. Nature; Lond.: 177302
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bawden F.C., Pikie N.W. 1937; The relationship between liquid crystalline preparations of cucumber viruses 3 and 4 and strains of tobacco mosaic virus. Brit. J. exp. Path 18:275
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bawden F.C., Pikie N.W. 1940; The effects of alkali and some simple organic substances on three plant viruses. Biochem. J 34:1278
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bawden F.C., Pirie N.W. 1945; The separation and properties of tobaccomosaic virus in different states of aggregation. Brit. J. exp. Path 26:294
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bawden F.C., Pirie N.W. 1956; Observations on the anomalous proteins occurring in extracts from plants infected with strains of tobacco mosaic virus. J. gen. Microbiol 14:460
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Capoor S.P. 1950; A mosaic disease of sann hemp in Bombay. Curr. Sci 19:22
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gierer A., Schramm G. 1956; Infectivity of ribonucleic acid from tobacco mosaic virus. Nature; Lond.: 177702
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnson J. 1947; Virus attenuation and the separation of strains by specific hosts. Phytopathology 37:822
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Knight C.A. 1947; The nature of some of the chemical differences among strains of tobacco mosaic virus. J. biol. Chem 171:297
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Knight C.A. 1955; Are cucumber viruses 3 and 4 strains of tobacco mosaic virus?. Virology 1:261
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kunkel L.O. 1934; Tobacco and aucuba-mosaic infections by single units of virus. Phytopathology 24:13 (Abstr.)
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lauffer M.A., Price W.C. 1945; Infection by viruses. Arch. Biochem 8:449
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lister R.M., Thresh J.M. 1955; A mosaic disease of leguminous plants caused by a strain of tobacco mosaic virus. Nature; Lond.: 1751047
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Price W.C. 1930; Local lesions on bean leaves inoculated with tobacco mosaic virus. Amer. J. Bot 17:694
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Siegel A., Wildman S.G. 1954; Some natural relationships among strains of tobacco mosaic virus. Phytopathology 44:277
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Silberschmidt K., Kramer M. 1941; Brazilian bean varieties as plant indicators for the tobacco-mosaic virus. Phytopathology 31:430
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Takahashi W.N., Ishii M. 1953; A macromolecular protein associated with tobacco mosaic virus infection: its isolation and properties. Amer. J. Bot 40:85
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-18-3-751
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-18-3-751
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error