1887

Abstract

The gut fungi are an unusual group of zoosporic fungi occupying a unique ecological niche, the anaerobic environment of the rumen. They exhibit two basic forms, with nuclear migration throughout the hyphal mass for polycentric species and with concentration of nuclear material in a zoosporangium for monocentric species. Differentiation between isolates of these fungi is difficult using conventional techniques. In this study, DNA-based methodologies were used to examine the relationships within and between two genera of monocentric gut fungi gathered from various geographical locations and host animals. The ribosomal ITS1 sequence from 16 mono- and 4 polycentric isolates was PCR-amplified and sequenced; the sequences obtained were aligned with published sequences and phylogenetic analyses were performed. These analyses clearly differentiate between the two genera and reflect the previously published physiological conclusions that spp. constitute a more closely related genus than the relatively divergent genus . The analyses place two type species and together but, contrary to a recent suggestion in the literature, place them apart from the other agreed species . hybridization and slot-blotting were investigated as potential methods for detection of and differentiation between monocentric gut fungi. DNA slot-blot analysis using ribosomal sequences is able to differentiate between gut fungal genera and thus has considerable potential for use in ecological studies of these organisms.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-146-2-393
2000-02-01
2021-10-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/146/2/1460393a.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-146-2-393&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Amann R. I., Krumholz L., Stahl D. A. 1990; Fluorescent-oligonucleotide probing of whole cells for determinative, phylogenetic, and environmental studies in microbiology. J Bacteriol 172:762–770
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowman B. H., Taylor J. W., Brownlee A. G., Lee J., Lu S.-D., White T. J. 1992; Molecular evolution of the fungi: relationships of the Basidiomycetes, Ascomycetes and Chytridiomycetes. Mol Biol Evol 9:285–296
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Doré J., Stahl D. A. 1991; Phylogeny of anaerobic rumen Chytridiomycetes inferred from small subunit ribosomal RNA sequence comparison. Can J Bot 69:1964–1971 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Felsenstein J. 1993 phylip (Phylogeny Inference Package version 3.5c). Distributed by the author Seattle: Dept of Genetics, University of Washington;
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gold J. J., Heath I. B., Bauchop T. 1988; Ultrastructural description of a new Chytrid genus of caecum anaerobe, Caecomyces equi gen. nov., sp. nov., assigned to the Neocallimasticaceae. Biosystems 21:403–415 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Heath I. B., Bauchop T., Skipp R. A. 1983; Assignment of the rumen anaerobe Neocallimastix frontalis to the Spizellomycetales (Chytridiomycetes) on the basis of its polyflagellate zoospore ultrastructure. Can J Bot 61:295–307 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Higgins D. G., Bleasby A. J., Fuchs R. 1992; clustal v – improved software for multiple sequence alignments. CABIOS 8:189–191
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ho Y. W., Barr D. J. S. 1995; Classification of anaerobic fungi from herbivores with emphasis on rumen fungi from Malaysia. Mycologia 87:655–677 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ho Y. W., Bauchop T., Abullah N., Jalaludin S. 1990; Ruminomyces elegans gen. et sp. nov. a polycentric anaerobic rumen fungus from cattle. Mycotaxon 38:397–405
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ho Y. W., Barr D. J. S., Abullah N., Jalaludin S., Kudo H. 1993; Anaeromyces, an earlier name for Ruminomyces. Mycotaxon 47:283–293
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Li J., Heath I. B. 1992; The phylogenetic relationships of the anaerobic chytridiomycetous gut fungi (Neocallimasticaceae) and the Chytridiomycota. I. Cladistic analysis of rRNA sequences. Can J Bot 70:1738–1746 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Li J., Heath I. B., Packer L. 1993; The phylogenetic relationships of the anaerobic chytridiomycetous gut fungi (Neocallimasticaceae) and the Chytridiomycota. II. Cladistic analysis of structural data and description of Neocallimasticales ord. nov.. Can J Bot 71:393–407 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lin C., Stahl D. A. 1995; Taxon-specific probes for the cellulolytic genus Fibrobacter reveal abundant and novel equine-associated populations. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1348–1351
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lowe S. E., Theodorou M. K., Trinci A. P. J., Hespell R. B. 1985; Growth of anaerobic rumen fungi on defined and semi-defined media lacking rumen fluid. J Gen Microbiol 131:2225–2229
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Marvin-Sikkema S. D., Lahpor G. A., Kraak M. N., Gottschal C., Prins R. A. 1992; Characterization of an anaerobic fungus from llama faeces. J Gen Microbiol 138:2235–2241 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Munn E. A., Orpin C. G., Greenwood C. A. 1988; The ultrastructure and possible relationships of four obligate anaerobic Chytridiomycete fungi from the rumen of sheep. Biosystems 21:67–82
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Musters W., Boon K., van der Sande C. A. F. M., van Heerikhuizen H., Planta R. J. 1990; Functional analysis of transcribed spacers of yeast ribosomal DNA. EMBO J 9:3989–3996
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Odenyo A. A., Mackie R. I., Stahl D. A., White B. A. 1994; The use of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes to study competition between ruminal fibrolytic bacteria: development of probes for Ruminococcus species and evidence for bacteriocin production. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:3688–3696
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Orpin C. G. 1975; Studies on the rumen flagellate Neocallimastix frontalis. J Gen Microbiol 91:249–262 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Orpin C. G. 1976; Studies on the rumen flagellate Sphaeromonas communis. J Gen Microbiol 94:270–280 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Orpin C. G. 1977; Invasion of plant tissue in the rumen by the flagellate Neocallimastix frontalis. J Gen Microbiol 98:423–430 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Orpin C. G. 1989; Ecology of rumen anaerobic fungi in relation to the nutrition of the host animal. In The Role of Protozoa and Fungi in Ruminant Digestion (OECD/UNE International Seminar) pp. 1–10Edited by Nolan J. V., Leng R. A. , Demeyer D. I. Armidale, New South Wales: Penambul;
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Orpin C. G., Munn E. A. 1986; Neocallimastix patriciarum sp.nov., a new member of the Neocallimasticaceae inhabiting the rumen of sheep. Trans Br Mycol Soc 86:178–181 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sanger F., Nicklen S., Coulson A. R. 1977; DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:5463–5464 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Stahl D. A., Flesher B., Mansfield H. R., Montgomery L. 1988; Use of phylogenetically based hybridisation probes for studies of ruminal microbial ecology. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:1079–1084
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Theodorou M. K., Lowe S. E., Trinci A. P. J. 1991; Anaerobic fungi and the rumen ecosystem. In The Fungal Community pp. 43–71Edited by Carroll G. C., Wicklow D. T. New York: Marcel Dekker;
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Tsai K. P., Calza R. E. 1993; Optimisation of protein and cellulase secretion in Neocallimastix frontalis EB188. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 39:477–482 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Vavra J., Joyon L. 1966; Étude sur la morphologie, le cycle évolutif et la position systematique de Callimastix cyclopsis Weissenberg 1912. Protistologica 2:15–16
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Webb J., Theodorou M. K. 1991; Neocallimastix hurleyensis sp.nov., an anaerobic fungus from the ovine rumen. Can J Bot 69:1220–1224 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-146-2-393
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-146-2-393
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error