1887

Abstract

Mutated and incompatibility factors of and ) were recovered from fruit bodies produced on common- and common- heterokaryons, respectively, following mutagenesis. The hyphal cells were either uninucleate or binucleate and had pseudo-clamps irregularly scattered along the hyphae. The hyphal cells were predominantly uninucleate and had no clamp structures. double mutants constructed from these and strains were predominantly binucleate, had true clamps, and gave rise to fertile fruit bodies indistinguishable from those of wild-type dikaryons. Although these strains resembled in most respects a normal dikaryon, they produced abundant oidiophores and oidia like the monokaryons. The oidia were uninucleate, and possessed the potential to grow into fertile homokaryons with the above characteristics.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-130-12-3219
1984-12-01
2021-10-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/130/12/mic-130-12-3219.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-130-12-3219&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Casselton L.A. 1978; Dikaryon formation in the higher basidiomycetes. In the filamentous fungi 3 pp. 278–297 Smith J. E., Berry D. R. Edited by London: Arnold;
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Day P.R. 1963; Mutations of the A., mating type factor in Coprinus lagopus. Genetical Research 4:55–64
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fries L. 1953; Factors promoting growth of Coprinusfimetarius (L.) under high temperature conditions. Physiologia plantarum 6:551–563
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Harder R. 1926; Mikrochirurgische Untersuchun-gen über die geschlechtliche Tendenz der Paarkeme des homothallischencoprinus sterquilinus Fries. Planta 2:263–275
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Haylock R.W., Economou A., Casselton L.A. 1980; Dikaryon formation in Coprinus Cinereus: selection and identification of B factor mutants. Journal of General microbiology 121:17–26
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Koltin Y. 1970; Development of AmutBmut strain of Schizophyllum commune. Archiv für Mikrobiologie 14:123–128
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Koltin Y. 1978; Genetic structure of incompatibility factors - the ABC of sex. In genetics and morphogenesis in the basidiomycetes pp. 31–54
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Koltin Y., Stamberg J., Lemke P.A. 1972; Genetic structure and evolution of the incompatibility factors in higher fungi. Bacteriological reviews 36:156–171
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kuroiwa T., Nishibayashi S., Kawano S., Suzuki T. 1981; Visualization of DNA in various phages (T4, x T7, ɸ29) by ethidium bromide epifluorescent microscopy. Experientia 37:969–970
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Miyake H., Tanaka K., Ishikawa T. 1980; Basidiospore formation in monokaryotic fruiting bodies of a mutant strain of Coprinus macrorhizus. Archives of microbiology 126:207–212
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Parag Y. 1962; Mutations in the B incompatibility factor of Schizophyllum commune. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 48:743–750
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Raper C.A., Raper J.R. 1966; Mutations modifying sexual morphogenesis in Schizophyllum. Genetics 54:1151–1168
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Raper J.R. 1966italic Genetics of sexuality in higher fungi. New York: Ronald Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Raper J.R., San Antonio J.P. 1954; Hetero-karyotic mutagenesis in hymenomycetes. 1. Hetero-karyosis in Schizophyllum commune. American Journal of Botany 41:69–86
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Raper J.R., Boyd D.H., Raper C.A. 1965; Primary and secondary mutations at the incompatibility loci in Schizophyllum. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the united states of america 53:1324–1332
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Swiezynski K.M., DAY P.R. 1960a; Hetero-karyon formation in Coprinus lagopus. Genetical Research 1:114–128
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Swiezynski K.M., Day P.R. 1960b; Migration of nuclei in Coprinus lagopus. Genetical Research 1:129–139
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Uno I., Ishikawa T. 1971; Chemical and genetical control of induction of monokaryotic fruiting bodies in Coprinus macrorhizus. Molecular and general genetics 113:228–239
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-130-12-3219
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-130-12-3219
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error