1887

Journal of Medical Microbiology logo

Volume 72, Issue 6

The bacteriology of diabetic foot ulcers and infections and incidence of Small Colony Variants Open Access

Abstract

Uninfected diabetes-related foot ulcer (DFU) progression to diabetes-related foot infection (DFI) is a prevalent complication for patients with diabetes. DFI often progresses to osteomyelitis (DFI-OM). Active (growing) is the most common pathogen in these infections. There is relapse in 40–60 % of cases even when the initial treatment at the DFI stage apparently clears infection.

adopts the quasi-dormant Small Colony Variant (SCV) state during DFU and consequently infection, and when present in DFI cases also permits survival in non-diseased tissues as a reservoir to cause relapse.

. The aim of this study was to investigate the bacterial factors that facilitate persistent infections.

People with diabetes were recruited from two tertiary hospitals. Clinical and bacterial data was taken from 153 patients with diabetes (51 from a control group with no ulcer or infection) and samples taken from 102 patients with foot complications to identify bacterial species and their variant colony types, and then compare the bacterial composition in those with uninfected DFU, DFI and those with DFI-OM, of whom samples were taken both from wounds (DFI-OM/W) and bone (DFI-OM/B). Intracellular, extracellular and proximal ‘healthy’ bone were examined.

was identified as the most prevalent pathogen in diabetes-related foot pathologies (25 % of all samples). For patients where disease progressed from DFU to DFI-OM, was isolated as a diversity of colony types, with increasing numbers of SCVs present. Intracellular (bone) SCVs were found, and even within uninfected bone SCVs were present. Wounds of 24 % of patients with uninfected DFU contained active . All patients with a DFI with a wound but not bone infection had previously had isolated from an infection (including amputation), representing a relapse.

The presence of SCVs in recalcitrant pathologies highlights their importance in persistent infections through the colonization of reservoirs, such as bone. The survival of these cells in intracellular bone is an important clinical finding supporting data. Also, there seems to be a link between the genetics of found in deeper infections compared to those only found in DFU.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): diabetic , diabetic foot infection , foot ulcer , small colony variants and Staphylococcus aureus
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • SA Allied Health Research Seed Funding.
    • Principle Award Recipient: TomP. Walsh
  • Australian and New Zealand Society for Vascular Surgery
    • Principle Award Recipient: JosephDawson
© 2023 The Authors
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001716
2023-06-16
2024-05-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/72/6/jmm001716.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001716&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. WHO Global Report of Diabetes Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Armstrong DG, Lipsky BA. Diabetic foot infections: stepwise medical and surgical management. Int Wound Journal 2004; 1:123–132 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Singh N, Armstrong DG, Lipsky BA. Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. JAMA 2005; 293:217–228 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Wunderlich RP, Mohler MJ, Wendel CS et al. Risk factors for foot infections in individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006; 29:1288–1293 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Deery HG, Embil JM, Joseph WS et al. Diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39:885–910 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Uckay I, Aragon-Sanchez J, Lew D, Lipsky BA. Diabetic foot infections: what have we learned in the last 30 years. Int J Infect Dis 2015; 40:81–91
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Akhi MT, Ghotaslou R, Memar MY, Asgharzadeh M, Varshochi M et al. Frequency of MRSA in diabetic foot infections. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 2017; 37:58–62 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Ertugrul MB, Uyar Gulec G, Baktiroglu S, Corekli E, Ture M. The distribution of causative microorganisms in diabetic foot infection: has there been any alterations?. Klimik Dergisi 2017; 30:27–31 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Kalinka J, Hachmeister M, Geraci J, Sordelli D, Hansen U et al. Staphylococcus aureus isolates from chronic osteomyelitis are characterized by high host cell invasion and intracellular adaptation, but still induce inflammation. Int J Med Microbiol 2014; 304:1038–1049 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Yang D, Wijenayaka AR, Solomon LB, Pederson SM, Findlay DM et al. Novel insights into Staphylococcus aureus deep bone infections: the involvement of osteocytes. mBio 2018; 9:e00415-18 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Tong SYC, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG. Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev 2015; 28:603–661 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Waldvogel FA, Medoff G, Swartz MN. Osteomyelitis: a review of clinical features, therapeutic considerations and unusual aspects. N Engl J Med 1970; 282:198–206 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Hobizal KB, Wukich DK. Diabetic foot infections: current concept review. Diabet Foot Ankle 2012; 3:18409 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Al-Allak MH, Al-Khafaji NSK, Al-Dahmoshi HOM. Microbial and resistance profile among diabetic foot-infections. EurAsian J Biosci 2019; 13:1953–1959
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Lin SY, Lin NY, Huang YY, Hsieh CC, Huang YC. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage and infection among patients with diabetic foot ulcer. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2020; 53:292–299 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Viswanathan V, Pendsey S, Radhakrishnan C, Rege TD, Ahdal J et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diabetic foot infection in India: a growing menace. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2019; 18:236–246 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Abdulrazak A, Bitar ZI, Al-Shamali AA, Mobasher LA. Bacteriological study of diabetic foot infections. J Diabetes Complications 2005; 19:138–141 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Ge Y, MacDonald D, Hait H, Lipsky B, Zasloff M et al. Microbiological profile of infected diabetic foot ulcers. Diabet Med 2002; 19:1032–1034 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Tentolouris N, Jude EB, Smirnof I, Knowles EA, Boulton AJM. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an increasing problem in a diabetic foot clinic. Diabet Med 1999; 16:767–771 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Kahl BC, Becker K, Löffler B. Clinical significance and pathogenesis of staphylococcal small colony variants in persistent infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 2016; 29:401–427 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Keren I, Kaldalu N, Spoering A, Wang Y, Lewis K. Persister cells and tolerance to antimicrobials. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2004; 230:13–18 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Tuchscherr L, Kreis CA, Hoerr V, Flint L, Hachmeister M et al. Staphylococcus aureus develops increased resistance to antibiotics by forming dynamic small colony variants during chronic osteomyelitis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2016; 71:438–448 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Krismer B, Weidenmaier C, Zipperer A, Peschel A. The commensal lifestyle of Staphylococcus aureus and its interactions with the nasal microbiota. Nat Rev Microbiol 2017; 15:675–687 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Hoffman LR, Déziel E, D’Argenio DA, Lépine F, Emerson J et al. Selection for Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants due to growth in the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2006; 103:19890–19895 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Hotterbeekx A, Kumar-Singh S, Goossens H, Malhotra-Kumar S. In vivo and in vitro interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus spp. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2017; 7:00106 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee J, Zilm PS, Kidd SP. Novel research models for Staphylococcus aureus small colony variants (SCV) development: co-pathogenesis and growth rate. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:321 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Berthelot P, Grattard F, Cazorla C, Passot J-P, Fayard J-P et al. Is nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus the main acquisition pathway for surgical-site infection in orthopaedic surgery?. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2010; 29:373–382 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Gagnaire J, Botelho-Nevers E, Martin-Simoes P, Morel J, Zéni F et al. Interplay of nasal and rectal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2019; 38:1811–1819 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lederer SR, Riedelsdorf G, Schiffl H. Nasal carriage of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the prevalence, patients at risk and the effect of elimination on outcomes among outclinic haemodialysis patients. Eur J Med Res 2007; 12:284–288 [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Taha AB. Relationship and susceptibility profile of Staphylococcus aureus infection diabetic foot ulcers with Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage. Foot 2013; 23:11–16 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Wertheim HFL, Vos MC, Ott A, van Belkum A, Voss A et al. Risk and outcome of nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in nasal carriers versus non-carriers. Lancet 2004; 364:703–705 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Dunyach-Remy C, Courtais-Coulon C, DeMattei C, Jourdan N, Schuldiner S et al. Link between nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and infected diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Metab 2017; 43:167–171 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Jeyaraman K, Berhane T, Hamilton M, Chandra AP, Falhammar H. Mortality in patients with diabetic foot ulcer: a retrospective study of 513 cases from a single centre in the Northern Territory of Australia. BMC Endocr Disord 2019; 19:1 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Commons RJ, Robinson CH, Gawler D, Davis JS, Price RN. High burden of diabetic foot infections in the top end of Australia: an emerging health crisis (DEFINE study). Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2015; 110:147–157 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Mills JL, Conte MS, Armstrong DG, Pomposelli FB, Schanzer A et al. The society for vascular surgery lower extremity threatened limb classification system: risk stratification based on wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI). J Vasc Surg 2014; 59:220–234 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Hussain M, Hastings JGM, White PJ. A chemically defined medium for slime production by coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Med Microbiol 1991; 34:143–147 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang S-H, Sun Z-L, Guo Y-J, Yang B-Q, Yuan Y et al. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from foot ulcers in diabetic patients in a Chinese care hospital: risk factors for infection and prevalence. J Med Microbiol 2010; 59:1219–1224 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Eliasson B. Cigarette smoking and diabetes. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2003; 45:405–413 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Messner B, Bernhard D. Smoking and cardiovascular disease: mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction and early atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2014; 34:509–515 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Tabit CE, Chung WB, Hamburg NM, Vita JA. Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes mellitus: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2010; 11:61–74 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Tepper OM, Galiano RD, Capla JM, Kalka C, Gagne PJ et al. Human endothelial progenitor cells from type II diabetics exhibit impaired proliferation, adhesion, and incorporation into vascular structures. Circulation 2002; 106:2781–2786 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Lewis RP, Sutter VL, Finegold SM. Bone infections involving anaerobic bacteria. Medicine 1978; 57:279–305 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Walter G, Vernier M, Pinelli PO, Million M, Coulange M et al. Bone and joint infections due to anaerobic bacteria: an analysis of 61 cases and review of the literature. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2014; 33:1355–1364 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Nelson A, Wright-Hughes A, Backhouse MR, Lipsky BA, Nixon J et al. CODIFI (Concordance in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Infection): a cross-sectional study of wound swab versus tissue sampling in infected diabetic foot ulcers in England. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e019437 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Smith ME, Robinowitz N, Chaulk P, Johnson K. Comparison of chronic wound culture techniques: swab versus curetted tissue for microbial recovery. Br J Community Nurs 2014; 19 (Suppl. 9):S22–S26 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Huang Y, Cao Y, Zou M, Luo X, Jiang Y et al. A comparison of tissue versus swab culturing of infected diabetic foot wounds. Int J Endocrinol 2016; 2016:8198714 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Bui LMG, Hoffmann P, Turnidge JD, Zilm PS, Kidd SP. Prolonged growth of a clinical Staphylococcus aureus strain selects for a stable small-colony-variant cell type. Infect Immun 2015; 83:470–481 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Bui LMG, Kidd SP. A full genomic characterization of the development of a stable small colony variant cell-type by a clinical Staphylococcus aureus strain. Infect Genet Evol 2015; 36:345–355 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Ramsey MM, Freire MO, Gabrilska RA, Rumbaugh KP, Lemon KP. Staphylococcus aureus shifts toward commensalism in response to Corynebacterium species. Front Microbiol 2016; 7:1230 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001716
Loading
The bacteriology of diabetic foot ulcers and infections and incidence of Staphylococcus aureus Small Colony Variants
J. Med. Microbiol. 72, 001716 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001716
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001716
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001716
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error