1887

Journal of Medical Microbiology logo

Volume 72, Issue 2

Nitrite-negative results in urinary tract infection by Enterobacterales: does the nitrite dipstick test have low sensitivity? No Access

Abstract

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common bacterial infections among humans. Urine culture is the gold standard diagnostic method for UTI; however, the dipstick test for nitrite is a widely used method signalling the presence of urinary nitrate-reducing bacteria. Unlike the gold standard, the dipstick test is easy to perform, while it is also less time-consuming and less expensive, and produces a result in a few minutes. This study investigates the sensitivity of the dipstick test for nitrite compared with the Griess test in urine samples from UTI caused by species. We used the Griess test, which is the gold standard in nitrite measurement, to determine the sensitivity of the nitrite dipstick test. Semiquantitative urine culture was performed using standard procedures, and identification was performed by manual conventional biochemical tests. In the first sample selection, 3 % (8/267) of urine samples suspected of UTI, analysed from March to April 2016, were nitrite-negative by dipstick test but positive for in the urine culture. In the second sample selection, 5 % (2/44) of urine samples from October to December 2022 were also nitrite-negative but showed urine isolation. All nitrite-negative dipstick results were consistent with the Griess test. was the most prevalent bacterium, followed by independent of sample selection. The dipstick test is a safe alternative for investigating nitrite in urine samples. We believe that the cause of nitrite-negative results is a lack of dietary nitrate, dilution of urine and exogenous interference (e.g. ascorbic acid). These findings support the idea that standard urine culture is necessary to rule out UTI.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): nitrite , urinary tract infection and urine dipstick test
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Award grant code 001)
© 2023 The Authors
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001663
2023-02-09
2024-05-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Foxman B. The epidemiology of urinary tract infection. Nat Rev Urol 2010; 7:653–660 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Flores-Mireles AL, Walker JN, Caparon M, Hultgren SJ. Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options. Nat Rev Microbiol 2015; 13:269–284 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Schmiemann G, Kniehl E, Gebhardt K, Matejczyk MM, Hummers-Pradier E. The diagnosis of urinary tract infection: a systematic review. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2010; 107:361–367 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Chu CM, Lowder JL. Diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections across age groups. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219:40–51 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhansali AJ, Inbaraj LR, George CE, Norman G. Can urine dipstick test be an alternative to detect urinary tract infection in limited resource setting? - A validity study from Bangalore, India. J Family Med Prim Care 2020; 9:561–566 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Kouri T, Fogazzi G, Gant V, Hallander H, Hofmann W et al. European urinalysis guidelines. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2000; 60:1–96 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Association of Official Analytical Chemists Nitrites in cured meat. Official Method 973.31. In Official Methods of Analysis, 15th. edn Arlington, VA: AOAC international; 1990
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Schito GC, Naber KG, Botto H, Palou J, Mazzei T et al. The ARESC study: an international survey on the antimicrobial resistance of pathogens involved in uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009; 34:407–413 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Eigbefoh JO, Isabu P, Okpere E, Abebe J. The diagnostic accuracy of the rapid dipstick test to predict asymptomatic urinary tract infection of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 28:490–495 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Procop GW, Church DL, Hall GS et al. Koneman’s Color Atlas & Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology, 7th. edn Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2017
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Franz M, Hörl WH. Common errors in diagnosis and management of urinary tract infection. I: pathophysiology and diagnostic techniques. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14:2746–2753 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Florin THJ, Neale G, Cummings JH. The effect of dietary nitrate on nitrate and nitrite excretion in man. Br J Nutr 1990; 64:387–397 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Ho XL, Loke WM. Dietary plant sterols supplementation increases in vivo nitrite and nitrate production in healthy adults: a randomized, controlled study. J Food Sci 2017; 82:1750–1756 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Ayazi P, Daneshi MM. Comparison of urine culture and urine dipstick analysis in diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Acta Med Iran 2007; 45:501–504
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Najeeb S, Munir T, Rehman S, Hafiz A, Gilani M et al. Comparison of urine dipstick test with conventional urine culture in diagnosis of urinary tract infection. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2015; 25:108–110
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Reardon JM, Carstairs KL, Rudinsky SL, Simon LV, Riffenburgh RH et al. Urinalysis is not reliable to detect a urinary tract infection in febrile infants presenting to the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2009; 27:930–932 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001663
Loading
Nitrite-negative results in urinary tract infection by Enterobacterales: does the nitrite dipstick test have low sensitivity?
J. Med. Microbiol. 72, 001663 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001663
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001663
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001663
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error