1887

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance in has become a global issue, and certain groups have a higher probability of acquiring resistant strains. Little is known about the genetic diversity and characteristics of the antimicrobial resistance-determining sites (ARDSs) of in the Korean population. Therefore, we examined the genetic diversity of the ARDSs of positive urogenital samples obtained from Korean females (G1) and males (G2) visiting primary care clinics and DNA samples from referred males (G3) with persistent urethritis. From 2014 to 2019, 54 patients from G1, 86 patients from G2, and 68 patients from G3 were included in the study. Sanger sequencing was performed on the 2058/2059 sites in the 23S rRNA gene and quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) of . The rates of mutation in G1, G2, and G3 were 1.85, 5.81, and 48.53 %, respectively, for A2059G in the 23S rRNA gene (<0.001); 1.85, 0, and 17.78 %, respectively, for M95R or I in (<0.001); 0, 0, and 31.11 %, respectively, for D99N or G in (<0.001); and 7.41, 16.28, and 30 %, respectively, for S83R or N or I in (=0.015). A2059G significantly increased the risk of mutations at the 95, 99, and 83 sites (all <0.01). In conclusion, although the genetic diversity of the ARDSs of was variable among the groups, it was generally lower in isolates with macrolide resistance and higher in isolates with quinolone resistance in Korea compared with the isolates in other countries. The G3 group demonstrated increased genetic diversity at the A2059G, 95, 99, and 83 sites.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Agency (Award R-2019-00990)
    • Principle Award Recipient: LeeGilho
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001460
2021-11-23
2024-05-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Lis R, Rowhani-Rahbar A, Manhart LE. Mycoplasma genitalium infection and female reproductive tract disease: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2015; 61:418–426 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cina M, Baumann L, Egli-Gany D, Halbeisen FS, Ali H et al. Mycoplasma genitalium incidence, persistence, concordance between partners and progression: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect 2019; 95:328–335 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Totten PA, Schwartz MA, Sjöström KE, Kenny GE, Handsfield HH et al. Association of Mycoplasma genitalium with nongonococcal urethritis in heterosexual men. J Infect Dis 2001; 183:269–276 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hamasuna R, Jensen JS, Osada Y. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Mycoplasma genitalium strains examined by broth dilution and quantitative PCR. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53:4938–4939 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jensen JS, Cusini M, Gomberg M, Moi H. 2016 European guideline on Mycoplasma genitalium infections. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2016; 30:1650–1656 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Couldwell DL, Lewis DA. Mycoplasma genitalium infection: current treatment options, therapeutic failure, and resistance-associated mutations. Infect Drug Resist 2015; 8:147–161 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jensen JS, Bradshaw C. Management of Mycoplasma genitalium infections - can we hit a moving target?. BMC Infect Dis 2015; 15:343 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Workowski KA, Bolan GA. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep 2015; 64:1–137
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Fookes MC, Hadfield J, Harris S, Parmar S, Unemo M et al. Mycoplasma genitalium: whole genome sequence analysis, recombination and population structure. BMC Genomics 2017; 18:993 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Deguchi T, Ito S, Yasuda M, Sato Y, Uchida C et al. Surveillance of the prevalence of macrolide and/or fluoroquinolone resistance-associated mutations in Mycoplasma genitalium in Japan. J Infect Chemother 2018; 24:861–867 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ke W, Li D, Tso LS, Wei R, Lan Y et al. Macrolide and fluoroquinolone associated mutations in Mycoplasma genitalium in a retrospective study of male and female patients seeking care at a STI Clinic in Guangzhou, China, 2016-2018. BMC Infect Dis 2020; 20:950 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Machalek DA, Tao Y, Shilling H, Jensen JS, Unemo M et al. Prevalence of mutations associated with resistance to macrolides and fluoroquinolones in Mycoplasma genitalium: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; 20:1302–1314 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fernández-Huerta M, Serra-Pladevall J, Pich OQ, Barberá MJ, Espasa M. From resistance-guided to risk-guided antimicrobial therapy in Mycoplasma genitalium. Sex Transm Dis 2020; 47:409–411 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim YA, Park YS, Youk T, Lee H, Lee K. Trends in South Korean antimicrobial use and association with changes in Escherichia coli resistance rates: 12-year ecological study using a nationwide surveillance and antimicrobial prescription database. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0209580 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee B, Choi YJ, Choi Y, Kong N, Choi M. Medical utilization and antibiotics use of prostatitis patients in Korea. Korean J Clin Pharm 2018; 28:117–123
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Pereyre S, Goret J, Bébéar C. Mycoplasma pneumoniae: current knowledge on macrolide resistance and treatment. Front Microbiol 2016; 7:974 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Shipitsyna E, Rumyantseva T, Golparian D, Khayrullina G, Lagos AC et al. Prevalence of macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance-mediating mutations in Mycoplasma genitalium in five cities in Russia and Estonia. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0175763 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Sweeney EL, Trembizki E, Bletchly C, Bradshaw CS, Menon A et al. Levels of Mycoplasma genitalium antimicrobial resistance differ by both region and gender in the state of Queensland, Australia: implications for treatment guidelines. J Clin Microbiol 2019; 57:e01555 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Forslund O, Hjelm M, El-Ali R, Johnsson A, Bjartling C. Mycoplasma genitalium and macrolide resistance-associated mutations in the Skåne region of southern Sweden 2015. Acta Derm Venereol 2017; 97:1235–1238 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Park H, Sim S, Lee G. The presence of Chlamydia is associated with increased leukocyte counts and pain severity in men with chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Urology 2015; 85:574–579 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lee G, Park J, Kim B, Kim S-A, Yoo C-K et al. OmpA genotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis from Korean female sex workers. J Infect 2006; 52:451–454 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jensen JS, Uldum SA, Søndergård-Andersen J, Vuust J, Lind K. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycoplasma genitalium in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29:46–50 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Jensen JS, Bradshaw CS, Tabrizi SN, Fairley CK, Hamasuna R. Azithromycin treatment failure in Mycoplasma genitalium-positive patients with nongonococcal urethritis is associated with induced macrolide resistance. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 47:1546–1553 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Chambers LC, Jensen JS, Morgan JL, Lowens MS, Romano SS et al. Lack of association between the S83I ParC mutation in Mycoplasma genitalium and treatment outcomes among men who have sex with men with nongonococcal urethritis. Sex Transm Dis 2019; 46:805–809 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. de Salazar A, Barrientos-Durán A, Espadafor B, Fuentes-López A, Chueca N et al. Macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance of Mycoplasma genitalium in southern Spain, 2018-2019. Sex Transm Infect 2021; 97:8–10 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001460
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.001460
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error