1887

Abstract

Purpose. We sought to explore the current status of antifungal stewardship (AFS) initiatives across National Health Service (NHS) Trusts within England, the challenges and barriers, as well as ways to improve current AFS programmes.

Methodology. An electronic survey was sent to all 155 acute NHS Trusts in England. A total of 47 Trusts, corresponding to 30 % of English acute Trusts, responded to the the survey; 46 Trusts (98 %) had an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programme but only 5 (11 %) had a dedicated AFS programme. Overall, 20 (43 %) Trusts said they included AFS as part of their AMS programmes. From those conducting AFS programmes, 7 (28 %) have an AFS/management team, 16 (64 %) monitor and report on antifungal usage, 5 (20 %) have dedicated AFS ward rounds and 12 (48 %) are directly involved in the management of invasive fungal infections.

Results/Key findings. Altogether, 13 acute Trusts (52 %) started their AFS programme to manage costs, whilst 12 (48 %) commenced the programme due to clinical need; 27 (73 %) declared that they would increase their AFS initiatives if they could. Of those without an AFS programme, 14 (67 %) responded that this was due to lack of resources/staff time. Overall, 12 Trusts (57 %) responded that the availability of rapid diagnostics and clinical support would enable them to conduct AFS activities.

Conclusion. Although a minority of Trusts conduct dedicated AFS programmes, nearly half include AFS as part of routine AMS activities. Cost issues are the main driver for AFS, followed by clinical need. The availability of rapid diagnostics and clinical support could help increase AFS initiatives.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000612
2017-10-25
2019-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmm/66/11/1581.html?itemId=/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000612&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Standiford HC, Chan S, Tripoli M, Weekes E, Forrest GN. Antimicrobial stewardship at a large tertiary care academic medical center: cost analysis before, during, and after a 7-year program. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:338–345 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. López-Medrano F, San Juan R, Lizasoain M, Catalán M, Ferrari JM et al. A non-compulsory stewardship programme for the management of antifungals in a university-affiliated hospital. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013;19:56–61 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Mondain V, Lieutier F, Hasseine L, Gari-Toussaint M, Poiree M et al. A 6-year antifungal stewardship programme in a teaching hospital. Infection 2013;41:621–628 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Valerio M, Rodriguez-Gonzalez CG, Muñoz P, Caliz B, Sanjurjo M et al. Evaluation of antifungal use in a tertiary care institution: antifungal stewardship urgently needed. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014;69:1993–1999 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Micallef C, Aliyu SH, Santos R, Brown NM, Rosembert D et al. Introduction of an antifungal stewardship programme targeting high-cost antifungals at a tertiary hospital in Cambridge, England. J Antimicrob Chemother 2015;70:1908–1911 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Parkins MD, Sabuda DM, Elsayed S, Laupland KB. Adequacy of empirical antifungal therapy and effect on outcome among patients with invasive Candida species infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007;60:613–618 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bartholomew JS, Banfield S, Atherton GT, Denning DW. Comment on: Antifungal therapy: drug-drug interactions at your fingertips. J Antimicrob Chemother 2016;71:2062.1–202062 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ashbee HR, Barnes RA, Johnson EM, Richardson MD, Gorton R et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antifungal agents: guidelines from the British Society for Medical Mycology. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014;69:1162–1176 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Schelenz S, Hagen F, Rhodes JL, Abdolrasouli A, Chowdhary A et al. First hospital outbreak of the globally emerging Candida auris in a European hospital. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2016;5:35 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Salehi E, Hedayati MT, Zoll J, Rafati H, Ghasemi M et al. Discrimination of aspergillosis, mucormycosis, fusariosis, and scedosporiosis in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimens by use of multiple real-time quantitative PCR assays. J Clin Microbiol 2016;54:2798–2803 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Denning DW, Perlin DS, Muldoon EG, Colombo AL, Chakrabarti A et al. Delivering on antimicrobial resistance agenda not possible without improving fungal diagnostic capabilities. Emerg Infect Dis 2017;23:177–183 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ashiru-Oredope D, Budd EL, Bhattacharya A, Din N, McNulty CA et al. Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship interventions recommended by national toolkits in primary and secondary healthcare sectors in England: TARGET and Start Smart Then Focus. J Antimicrob Chemother 2016;71:1408–1414 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gouliouris T, Micallef C, Yang H, Aliyu SH, Kildonaviciute K et al. Impact of a candidaemia care bundle on patient care at a large teaching hospital in England. J Infect 2016;72:501–503 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Burns KE, Duffett M, Kho ME, Meade MO, Adhikari NK et al. A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. CMAJ 2008;179:245–252 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Seo SK, Lo K, Abbo LM. Current state of antimicrobial stewardship at solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant centers in the United States. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:1195–1200 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000612
Loading
/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/jmm.0.000612
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error