1887

Abstract

Two clinically important subspecies, subsp. (type A) and subsp. (type B) are responsible for most tularaemia cases, but these isolates typically form a weak biofilm under conditions. Phase variation of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) has been reported in these subspecies, but the role of variation is unclear as LPS is crucial for virulence. We previously demonstrated that a subpopulation of LPS variants can constitutively form a robust biofilm but it is unclear whether virulence was affected. In this study, we show that biofilm-forming variants of both fully virulent subspecies were highly attenuated in the murine tularaemia model by multiple challenge routes. Genomic sequencing was performed on these strains, which revealed that all biofilm-forming variants contained a lesion within the gene, a formyltransferase involved in O-antigen synthesis. A Δ deletion mutant recapitulated the biofilm, O-antigen and virulence phenotypes observed in natural variants and could be rescued through complementation with a functional gene. Since the spontaneously derived biofilm-forming isolates in this study were a subpopulation of natural variants, reversion events to the gene were detected that eliminated the phenotypes associated with biofilm variants and restored virulence. These results demonstrate a role for WbtJ in biofilm formation, LPS variation and virulence of .

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Defense Threat Reduction Agency (Award CB10477)
    • Principle Award Recipient: JoelA. Bozue
  • Defense Threat Reduction Agency (Award CB10645)
    • Principle Award Recipient: JoelA. Bozue
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001437
2024-02-29
2024-05-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/170/2/mic001437.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001437&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Jellison W. Tularemia in North America University of Montana: University of Montana Foundation; 1974 p 276
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ellis J, Oyston PCF, Green M, Titball RW. Tularemia. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002; 15:631–646 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bishop A, Wang H-H, Donaldson TG, Brockinton EE, Kothapalli E et al. Tularemia cases increase in the USA from 2011 through 2019. Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis 2023; 3:100116 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hepburn MJ, Simpson AJH. Tularemia: current diagnosis and treatment options. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2008; 6:231–240 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dennis DT, Inglesby TV, Henderson DA, Bartlett JG, Ascher MS et al. Tularemia as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. JAMA 2001; 285:2763–2773 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Keim P, Johansson A, Wagner DM. Molecular epidemiology, evolution, and ecology of Francisella. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007; 1105:30–66 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Oyston PCF, Sjostedt A, Titball RW. Tularaemia: bioterrorism defence renews interest in Francisella tularensis. Nat Rev Microbiol 2004; 2:967–978 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Sjöstedt A. Tularemia: history, epidemiology, pathogen physiology, and clinical manifestations. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007; 1105:1–29 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hestvik G, Warns-Petit E, Smith LA, Fox NJ, Uhlhorn H et al. The status of tularemia in Europe in a one-health context: a review. Epidemiol Infect 2015; 143:2137–2160 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Maurin M, Gyuranecz M. Tularaemia: clinical aspects in Europe. Lancet Infect Dis 2016; 16:113–124 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Saslaw S, Eigelsbach HT, Prior JA, Wilson HE, Carhart S. Tularemia vaccine study. II. Respiratory challenge. Arch Intern Med 1961; 107:702 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. McCrumb FR. Aerosol infection of man with Pasteurella tularensis. Bacteriol Rev 1961; 25:262–267 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Rohrbach BW, Westerman E, Istre GR. Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of tularemia in Oklahoma, 1979 to 1985. South Med J 1991; 84:1091–1096 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Conlan JW, North RJ. Early pathogenesis of infection in the liver with the facultative intracellular bacteria Listeria monocytogenes, Francisella tularensis, and Salmonella typhimurium involves lysis of infected hepatocytes by leukocytes. Infect Immun 1992; 60:5164–5171 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Horzempa J, O’Dee DM, Stolz DB, Franks JM, Clay D et al. Invasion of erythrocytes by Francisella tularensis. J Infect Dis 2011; 204:51–59 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Cole LE, Elkins KL, Michalek SM, Qureshi N, Eaton LJ et al. Immunologic consequences of Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain infection: role of the innate immune response in infection and immunity. J Immunol 2006; 176:6888–6899 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen W, Kuolee R, Shen H, Bùsa M, Conlan JW. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) plays a relatively minor role in murine defense against primary intradermal infection with Francisella tularensis LVS. Immunol Lett 2005; 97:151–154 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Cowley SC, Myltseva SV, Nano FE. Phase variation in Francisella tularensis affecting intracellular growth, lipopolysaccharide antigenicity and nitric oxide production. Mol Microbiol 1996; 20:867–874 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Cowley SC, Myltseva SV, Nano FE. Suppression of Francisella tularensis growth in the rat by co-infection with F. novicida. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1997; 153:71–74 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Eigelsbach HT, Downs CM. Prophylactic effectiveness of live and killed tularemia vaccines. I. Production of vaccine and evaluation in the white mouse and guinea pig. J Immunol 1961; 87:415–425 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Eigelsbach HT, Braun W, Herring RD. Studies on the variation of Bacterium tularense. J Bacteriol 1951; 61:557–569 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Bell JF, Owen CR, Larson CL. Virulence of Bacterium tularense. I. A study of the virulence of Bacterium tularense in mice, guinea pigs, and rabbits. J Infect Dis 1955; 97:162–166 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hartley G, Taylor R, Prior J, Newstead S, Hitchen PG et al. Grey variants of the live vaccine strain of Francisella tularensis lack lipopolysaccharide O-antigen, show reduced ability to survive in macrophages and do not induce protective immunity in mice. Vaccine 2006; 24:989–996 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Waag DM, Sandström G, England MJ, Williams JC. Immunogenicity of a new lot of Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain in human volunteers. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 1996; 13:205–209 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Soni S, Ernst RK, Muszyński A, Mohapatra NP, Perry MB et al. Francisella tularensis blue-gray phase variation involves structural modifications of lipopolysaccharide o-antigen, core and lipid a and affects intramacrophage survival and vaccine efficacy. Front Microbiol 2010; 1:129 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Holland KM, Rosa SJ, Kristjansdottir K, Wolfgeher D, Franz BJ et al. Differential growth of Francisella tularensis, which alters expression of virulence factors, dominant antigens, and surface-carbohydrate synthases, governs the apparent virulence of Ft SchuS4 to immunized animals. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:1158 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Champion AE, Catanzaro KCF, Bandara AB, Inzana TJ. Formation of the Francisella tularensis biofilm is affected by cell surface glycosylation, growth medium, and a glucan exopolysaccharide. Sci Rep 2019; 9:12252 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mlynek KD, Lopez CT, Fetterer DP, Williams JA, Bozue JA. Phase variation of LPS and capsule is responsible for stochastic biofilm formation in Francisella tularensis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021; 11:808550 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Schaudinn C, Rydzewski K, Meister B, Grunow R, Heuner K. Francisella tularensis subsp. holarctica wild-type is able to colonize natural aquatic ex vivo biofilms. Front Microbiol 2023; 14:1113412 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol 2004; 2:95–108 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 1999; 284:1318–1322 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. James GA, Swogger E, Wolcott R, Pulcini E deLancey, Secor P et al. Biofilms in chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen 2008; 16:37–44 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Chamberlain RE. Evaluation of live tularemia vaccine prepared in a chemically defined medium. Appl Microbiol 1965; 13:232–235 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2114–2120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 2017; 13:e1005595 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Darling ACE, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res 2004; 14:1394–1403 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Seeman T. snippy: fast bacterial variant calling from NGS reads; 2015
  38. LoVullo ED, Miller CN, Pavelka MS, Kawula TH. TetR-based gene regulation systems for Francisella tularensis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012; 78:6883–6889 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. LoVullo ED, Sherrill LA, Pavelka MS. Improved shuttle vectors for Francisella tularensis genetics. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2009; 291:95–102 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Bachert BA, Richardson JB, Mlynek KD, Klimko CP, Toothman RG et al. Development, phenotypic characterization and genomic analysis of a Francisella tularensis panel for tularemia vaccine testing. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:725776 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Hinnebusch BJ, Jarrett CO, Bland DM. “Fleaing” the plague: adaptations of Yersinia pestis to its insect vector that lead to transmission. Annu Rev Microbiol 2017; 71:215–232 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Olsufiev NG, Emelyanova OS, Dunayeva TN. Comparative study of strains of B. tularense in the old and new world and their taxonomy. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol 1959; 3:138–149 [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Prior JL, Prior RG, Hitchen PG, Diaper H, Griffin KF et al. Characterization of the O antigen gene cluster and structural analysis of the O antigen of Francisella tularensis subsp. tularensis. J Med Microbiol 2003; 52:845–851 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Apicella MA, Post DMB, Fowler AC, Jones BD, Rasmussen JA et al. Identification, characterization and immunogenicity of an O-antigen capsular polysaccharide of Francisella tularensis. PLoS One 2010; 5:e11060 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Zimmer AL, Thoden JB, Holden HM. Three-dimensional structure of a sugar N-formyltransferase from Francisella tularensis. Protein Sci 2014; 23:273–283 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Lindgren M, Bröms JE, Meyer L, Golovliov I, Sjöstedt A. The Francisella tularensis LVS ΔpdpC mutant exhibits a unique phenotype during intracellular infection. BMC Microbiol 2013; 13:20 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Dwibedi C, Larsson P, Ahlinder J, Lindgren P, Myrtennäs K et al. Biological amplification of low frequency mutations unravels laboratory culture history of the bio-threat agent Francisella tularensis. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2020; 45:102230 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Torii N, Nozaki T, Masutani M, Nakagama H, Sugiyama T et al. Spontaneous mutations in the Helicobacter pylori rpsL gene. Mutat Res 2003; 535:141–145 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Rohmer L, Fong C, Abmayr S, Wasnick M, Larson Freeman TJ et al. Comparison of Francisella tularensis genomes reveals evolutionary events associated with the emergence of human pathogenic strains. Genome Biol 2007; 8:R102 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Rohmer L, Brittnacher M, Svensson K, Buckley D, Haugen E et al. Potential source of Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain attenuation determined by genome comparison. Infect Immun 2006; 74:6895–6906 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Kurtz SL, Voskanian-Kordi A, Simonyan V, Elkins KL. Sequence comparison of Francisella tularensis LVS, LVS-G and LVS-R. Pathog Dis 2018; 76: [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Jarrett CO, Deak E, Isherwood KE, Oyston PC, Fischer ER et al. Transmission of Yersinia pestis from an infectious biofilm in the flea vector. J Infect Dis 2004; 190:783–792 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Aoyagi KL, Brooks BD, Bearden SW, Montenieri JA, Gage KL et al. LPS modification promotes maintenance of Yersinia pestis in fleas. Microbiology (Reading) 2015; 161:628–638 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Chantratita N, Wuthiekanun V, Boonbumrung K, Tiyawisutsri R, Vesaratchavest M et al. Biological relevance of colony morphology and phenotypic switching by Burkholderia pseudomallei. J Bacteriol 2007; 189:807–817 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Wikraiphat C, Saiprom N, Tandhavanant S, Heiss C, Azadi P et al. Colony morphology variation of Burkholderia pseudomallei is associated with antigenic variation and O-polysaccharide modification. Infect Immun 2015; 83:2127–2138 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Mlynek KD, Bozue JA. Why vary what’s working? Phase variation and biofilm formation in Francisella tularensis. Front Microbiol 2022; 13:1076694 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Moore RA, Tuanyok A, Woods DE. Survival of Burkholderia pseudomallei in water. BMC Res Notes 2008; 1:11 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Lindemann SR, Peng K, Long ME, Hunt JR, Apicella MA et al. Francisella tularensis Schu S4 O-antigen and capsule biosynthesis gene mutants induce early cell death in human macrophages. Infect Immun 2011; 79:581–594 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Case EDR, Chong A, Wehrly TD, Hansen B, Child R et al. The Francisella O-antigen mediates survival in the macrophage cytosol via autophagy avoidance. Cell Microbiol 2014; 16:862–877 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Chance T, Chua J, Toothman RG, Ladner JT, Nuss JE et al. A spontaneous mutation in kdsD, A biosynthesis gene for 3 Deoxy-D-manno-Octulosonic Acid, occurred in a ciprofloxacin resistant strain of Francisella tularensis and caused a high level of attenuation in murine models of tularemia. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0174106 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Li J, Ryder C, Mandal M, Ahmed F, Azadi P et al. Attenuation and protective efficacy of an O-antigen-deficient mutant of Francisella tularensis LVS. Microbiology 2007; 153:3141–3153 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Twine SM, Vinogradov E, Lindgren H, Sjostedt A, Conlan JW. Roles for wbtC, wbtI, and kdtA genes in lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis, protein glycosylation, virulence, and immunogenicity in Francisella tularensis strain SCHU S4. Pathogens 2012; 1:12–29 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Vinogradov E, Conlan WJ, Gunn JS, Perry MB. Characterization of the lipopolysaccharide O-antigen of Francisella novicida (U112). Carbohydr Res 2004; 339:649–654 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Thomas RM, Titball RW, Oyston PCF, Griffin K, Waters E et al. The immunologically distinct O antigens from Francisella tularensis subspecies tularensis and Francisella novicida are both virulence determinants and protective antigens. Infect Immun 2007; 75:371–378 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Sjödin A, Svensson K, Ohrman C, Ahlinder J, Lindgren P et al. Genome characterisation of the genus Francisella reveals insight into similar evolutionary paths in pathogens of mammals and fish. BMC Genomics 2012; 13:268 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  66. McLendon MK, Apicella MA, Allen L-AH. Francisella tularensis: taxonomy, genetics, and Immunopathogenesis of a potential agent of biowarfare. Annu Rev Microbiol 2006; 60:167–185 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  67. De Pascalis R, Chou AY, Bosio CM, Huang C-Y, Follmann DA et al. Development of functional and molecular correlates of vaccine-induced protection for a model intracellular pathogen, F. tularensis LVS. PLoS Pathog 2012; 8:e1002494 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Rasmussen JA, Post DMB, Gibson BW, Lindemann SR, Apicella MA et al. Francisella tularensis Schu S4 lipopolysaccharide core sugar and O-antigen mutants are attenuated in a mouse model of tularemia. Infect Immun 2014; 82:1523–1539 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Champion AE, Bandara AB, Mohapatra N, Fulton KM, Twine SM et al. Further characterization of the Capsule-Like Complex (CLC) produced by Francisella tularensis subspecies tularensis: protective efficacy and similarity to outer membrane vesicles. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2018; 8:182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Siebert C, Lindgren H, Ferré S, Villers C, Boisset S et al. Francisella tularensis: FupA mutation contributes to fluoroquinolone resistance by increasing vesicle secretion and biofilm formation. Emerg Microbes Infect 2019; 8:808–822 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Rasmussen JA, Fletcher JR, Long ME, Allen L-A, Jones BD. Characterization of Francisella tularensis Schu S4 mutants identified from a transposon library screened for O-antigen and capsule deficiencies. Front Microbiol 2015; 6:338 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Forsman M, Henningson E, Larsson E, Johansson T, Sandström G. Francisella tularensis does not manifest virulence in viable but non-culturable state. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2000; 31:217–224 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001437
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001437
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error