1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: Effects of alkalinity and hypertonicity on the motile behaviour of () 16 were observed, quantified, and compared with effects previously shown by similar factors on the motility of eubacteria. tolerated relatively high concentrations of hydroxide ions. Motility similar to that in controls was observed at pH values up to 9·8; but at pH 10·0 motility declined sharply with time of exposure, and there was structural alteration, visible as a blebbing of the cell envelope. Unlike the behaviour of eubacteria, immobilization of induced by hydroxide ions could not be reversed by lowering the pH. It is suggested that by restricting entry of hydroxide ions, the cell envelope protects its motility apparatus from adverse effects.

was completely immobilized in 0·5 and 1·0 -sucrose solutions. Unlike the eubacteria, leptospires were incapable of spontaneous reversion to motile forms and resumption of motility was dependent on both concentration and time of exposure to sucrose. Deuterium oxide did not affect movement, suggesting that even though leptospire endoflagella and the exoflagella of eubacteria are analogous, the motile behaviour of is significantly different from that of eubacteria.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-96-1-25
1976-09-01
2021-07-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/96/1/mic-96-1-25.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-96-1-25&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Auran N. E., Johnson R. C., Ritzi D. M. 1972; Isolation of the outer sheath of Leptospira and its immunogenic properties in hamsters. Infection and Immunity 5:968–975
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Birch-Andersen A., Hovind Hougen K., Borg-Petersen C. 1973; Electron microscopy of Leptospira. 1.Leptospira strain pomona. Acta pathologica et microbiologica scandinavica B 81:665–676
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Henneberry R. C., Baseman J. B. 1970; Growth of a water strain of Leptospira on synthetic media. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 36:489–501
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Indge K. J. 1968; The effects of various anions and cations on the lysis of yeast protoplasts by osmotic shock. Journal of General Microbiology 51:425–432
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kaiser G. E., Doetsch R. N. 1975; Enhanced translational motion of Leptospira in viscous environments. Nature, London 255:656–657
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kiktenko V. S., Bakulina N. A., Levina L. F. 1974; Concerning the granule formation in lepto- spirae. Byulleten’ Éksperimental’noi biologii i meditsiny 76:83–86
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Nauman R. K., Holt S. C., Cox C. D. 1969; Purification, ultrastructure and composition of axial filaments from Leptospira. Journal of Bacteriology 98:264–280
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Okrend A. G., Doetsch R. N. 1969; Plasmolysis and bacterial motility: a method for the study of membrane function. Archiv für Mikrobiologie 69:69–78
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Schneider W. R., Doetsch R. N. 1974; Effect of viscosity on bacterial motility. Journal of Bacteriology 117:696–701
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Schuetze P. L., Doetsch R. N. 1967; Reversible ‘paralysis’ of the flagella of certain Gram-negative bacteria. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 13:1114–1115
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Zipf M. E., Doetsch R. N. 1973; Effects of deuterium oxide on bacterial flagellar motility. Archiv für Mikrobiologie 92:321–330
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-96-1-25
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-96-1-25
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error