1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

Tube sensitivity tests show that, of twelve penicillins, ampicillin, benzylpenicillin and 6-aminopenicillanic acid were the most active when tested against medium-sized inocula (10 organisms) of twelve strains of penicillinase-producing Klebsiella (11 and 1 ), which had been isolated from clinical material and were resistant to both ampicillin and tetracycline. An inoculum size effect was consistently noted when ampicillin and benzylpenicillin were tested against different inocula; the effect was significantly greater with ampicillin. The following parameters were measured for the strains, using both benzylpenicillin and ampicillin: magnitude of the inoculum size effect; inherent sensitivity (sensitivity of a small inoculum); rate of penicillin destruction; ability of penicillins to pass bacterial permeability barriers. From considerations of the relationships between these values, it has been concluded that penicillinase is primarily responsible for the observed resistance of only two of the twelve strains; although penicillinase and the lack of ability of penicillins to obtain free access into the bacterial cells add to the over-all penicillin resistance of the other ten strains, the primary reason for their penicillin resistance is neither their possession of penicillinase nor their permeability barrier: such resistance presumably reflects an innate lack of sensitivity of the cell wall synthesizing complex to inhibition by penicillins.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-41-2-175
1965-11-01
2024-12-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/41/2/mic-41-2-175.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-41-2-175&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abraham E. P. 1951 Penicillinase. The Enzymes. Ed. by Sumner J. B., Myrbäck K. 1 chap. 37 New York: Academic Press.;
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson K. J., Kennedy R. P., Plorde J. J., Shulman J. A., Petersdorf R. G. 1964; Effectiveness of ampicillin against Gram-negative bacteria. J. Am. med. Ass. 187:555
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ayliffe G. A. J. 1963; Ampicillin inactivation and sensitivity of coliform bacilli. J. gen. Microbiol. 30:339
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barber M., Waterworth P. M. 1964; Antibiotic sensitivity of Proteus species. J. clin. Path. 17:69
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cowan S. T., Steel K. J., Shaw C., Duguid J. P. 1960; A classification of the Klebsiella group. J. gen. Microbiol. 23:601
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Czekalowski J. W. 1950; Penicillin inactivators of bacterial origin. J. Path. Bact. 62:85
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hamilton-Miller J. M. T. 1963a; Penicillinase from Klebsiella aerogenes: a comparison with penicillinases from Gram-positive species. Biochem. J. 87:209
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hamilton-Miller J. M. T. 1963b; Inducible penicillinase from Proteus morgani. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 13:43
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hamilton-Miller J. M. T. 1964 Hydrolysis of 6-aminopenicillanic acid and penicillins by bacterial penicillinases. Ph.D. thesis, University of London
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hamilton-Miller J. M. T., Smith J. T. 1964; Inhibition of penicillinases from Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria by substrate analogues. Nature, Lond. 201:999
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hamilton-Miller J. M. T., Smith J. T., Knox R. 1964; Potentiation of penicillin activity by inhibition of penicillinase. Nature, Lond. 201:867
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaufmann W. 1964; The possible implication of a bacterial enzyme in the biochemical mode of action of penicillins on Gram-negative bacteria. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 14:458
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Knox R., Smith J. T. 1961; The nature of penicillinase resistance in staphylococci. Lancet ii520
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kushner D. J. 1955; The basis of chloramphenicol resistance in Pseudomonas fluorescens. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 58:347
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Luria S. E. 1946; A test for penicillin sensitivity and resistance in Staphylococcus. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 61:46
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Merkel J. R., Steers E. 1953; Relationship between ‘chloramphenicol reductase’ activity and chloramphenicol resistance in Escherichia coli. J. Bact. 66:389
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Okamoto S., Mizuno D. 1964; Mechanism of chloramphenicol and tetracycline resistance in Escherichia coli. J. gen. Microbiol. 35:125
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Percival A., Brumfitt W., de Louvois J. 1963; The role of penicillinase in determining natural and acquired resistance of Gram-negative bacteria to penicillins. J. gen. Microbiol. 32:77
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Ramsey H. H. 1958; Protein synthesis as a basis for chloramphenicol resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Nature, Lond. 182:602
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rolinson G. N., Stevens S. 1961; Microbiological studies on a new broad-spectrum penicillin ‘Penbritin’. Br. med. J. ii:191
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sabath L., Finland M. 1963; Inactivation of some semisynthetic penicillins by Gram-negative bacteria. J. Bact. 85:314
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Smith J. T. 1963; Penicillinase and ampicillin resistance in a strain of Escherichia coli. J. gen. Microbiol. 30:299
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Smith J. T., Hamilton-Miller J. M. T. 1963; Differences between penicillinases from Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Nature, Lond. 197:976
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sutherland R. 1964; The nature of insensitivity of Gram-negative bacteria towards penicillins. J. gen. Microbiol. 34:85
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Sutherland R., Batchelor F. R. 1964; Synergistic activity of penicillins against penicillinase-producing Gram-negative bacilli. Nature, Lond. 201:868
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Trafford J. A. P., MacLaren D. M., Lillicrap D. A., Barnes R. D. S., Houston J. C., Knox R. 1962; Ampicillin: a broad spectrum penicillin. Lancet i:987
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-41-2-175
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-41-2-175
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error