Four different methods were used to make visible the nuclei of strains and 2, and They were: (1) Giemsa staining after acid hydrolysis; (2) fluorescence microscopy after acridine orange treatment; (3) acriflavine staining and phase-contrast microscopy; (4) phase-contrast observations with high refractive index mounting medium (polyvinylpyrrolidone). Statistical analyses showed small but significant differences in nuclear counts between the methods. Methods 1 and 2 were somewhat preferable to methods 3 and 4 in that 1 and 2 were easier to score and there was less difference between observers. It was calculated that a single mean nuclear count, by any observer or method, based on 200 scored bacteria should 19 times out of 20 estimate the ‘true’ mean nuclear number of 2 to within about ± 7.5% and of and to within about ± 12%. By increasing the number of bacteria counted and the number of methods used these limits could be appreciably decreased.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error