1887

Abstract

Four different methods were used to make visible the nuclei of strains and 2, and They were: (1) Giemsa staining after acid hydrolysis; (2) fluorescence microscopy after acridine orange treatment; (3) acriflavine staining and phase-contrast microscopy; (4) phase-contrast observations with high refractive index mounting medium (polyvinylpyrrolidone). Statistical analyses showed small but significant differences in nuclear counts between the methods. Methods 1 and 2 were somewhat preferable to methods 3 and 4 in that 1 and 2 were easier to score and there was less difference between observers. It was calculated that a single mean nuclear count, by any observer or method, based on 200 scored bacteria should 19 times out of 20 estimate the ‘true’ mean nuclear number of 2 to within about ± 7.5% and of and to within about ± 12%. By increasing the number of bacteria counted and the number of methods used these limits could be appreciably decreased.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-39-2-267
1965-05-01
2019-10-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-39-2-267
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error