1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: Wet and dry Gram staining procedures have different characteristics in respect to their rates of decolorization. It has been proposed that this difference is due to a Gram-positive substrate which dissociates (becomes Gram-negative) in the presence of water. However, the differences between wet and dry Gram procedures can also be explained on the hypothesis that water influences the rate of solvent permeation through cell envelopes. Since no direct proof exists for the reality of the proposed Gram-positive substrate, and since evidence is presented here which cannot be explained by such a hypothesis, it is felt that the solvent permeation concept should be considered seriously as an explanation for the decolorization differences observed between wet and dry Gram procedures.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-36-2-257
1964-08-01
2021-10-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/36/2/mic-36-2-257.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-36-2-257&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Barbaro J. F., Kennedy E. R. 1954; A quantitative Gram reaction. J. Bact 67:603
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartholomew J. W. 1962; Variables influencing results, and the precise definition of steps in Gram staining as a means of standardizing the results obtained. Stain Tech 37:139
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartholomew J. W., Cromwell T., Finkelstein H. 1959; A correlation between iodine permeability and the Gram characteristic of cells. Nature; Lond: 183123
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bartholomew J. W., Mittwer T. 1950; The mechanism of the Gram reaction. I. The specificity of the primary dye. Stain Tech 25:103
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bartholomew J. W., Mittwer T., Finkelstein H. 1959; The phenomenon of Gram-positivity: its definition and some negative evidence on the causative role of sulfhydryl groups. Stain Tech 34:147
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Benians T. H. C. 1912; Observations on the Gram-positive and acid-fast properties of bacteria. J. Path. Bact 17:199
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Benians T. H. C. 1920; A further investigation into the principles underlying Gram’s stain, with special reference to the bacterial cell membrane. J. Path. Bact 23:401
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Burke V. 1922; Notes on the Gram stain with description of a new method. J. Bact 7:159
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Burke V., Barnes M. 1929; The cell wall and the Gram reaction. J. Bact 18:69
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chelton E. T. J., Jones A. S. 1959; The Gram-staining reaction of disintegrated microorganisms. J. gen. Microbiol 21:652
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Deussen E. 1921; Die Gramsche Bakterienfärbung, ihr Wesen und ihre Bedeutung. Z. Hyg. Infekt.-Kr 93:512
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fischer R., Larose P. 1952; Mechanism of Gram stain reversal. J. Bact 64:435
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Henry H., Stacey M. 1943; Histochemistry of the Gram reaction for micro-organisms. Nature; Lond: 151671
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lamanna C., Mallette M. F. 1954; The cytological basis for the role of the primary dye in the Gram stain. J. Bact 68:509
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mitchell P., Moyle J. 1950; Occurrence of a phosphoric ester in certain bacteria: its relation to Gram staining and penicillin sensitivity. Nature; Lond: 166218
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Mitchell P., Moyle J. 1954; The Gram reaction and cell composition: nucleic acids and other phosphate fractions. J. gen. Microbiol 10:533
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Salton M. R. J. 1963; The relationship between the nature of the cell wall and the Gram stain. J. gen. Microbiol 30:223
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Schumacher J. 1928; Zur Gramschen Färbung. Über die chemische Zusammensetzung der Lipoidsäure und über künstlich grampositiv gemachte Hefezellen. Zbl. Bakt. (Abt. 1. Orig.) 109:181
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Stearn A. E., Stearn E. W. 1930; The nature of the Gram compound and its bearing on the mechanism of staining. J. Bact 20:287
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Stearn W. W., Stearn A. E. 1924; The chemical mechanisms of bacterial behaviour. I. Behaviour toward dye-factors controlling Gram reaction. J. Bact 9:463
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Tucker F. L., Bartholomew J. W. 1962; Variations in the Gram staining results caused by air moisture. Stain Tech 37:157
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Webb M. 1948; The action of lysozyme on heat-killed Gram-positive micro-organisms. J. gen. Microbiol 2:260
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Wensinck F., Boevé J. J. 1957; Quantitative analysis of the Gram reaction. J. gen. Microbiol 17:401
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-36-2-257
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-36-2-257
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error