1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: Metabolic Control Analysis (MCA) has been applied to flux of substrates and products during the growth of a single species and of two interacting species in a chemostat. Single-species growth was described by classical chemostat kinetics and the two-species interaction was commensalism, the first species converting the inflowing limiting substrate to a product which provided the limiting substrate for the second species. For the single species situation, control of flux to product is shared by the dilution rate and bacterial specific growth rate, and control can be quantified in terms of two flux control coefficients C and Cμurepresenting the fractional changes in flux resulting from fractional changes in the dilution rate and maximum specific growth rate, respectively. At low dilution rates, dilution rate exerts greater control, whilst Cμexceeds C at high dilution rates. In the two-species commensal interaction, additional control on flux to product is exerted by species 2 and may be quantified in a further flux control coefficient Cμ. Control exerted by a particular species in this interaction increases as factors, e.g. maximum specific growth rate and saturation constant for growth, change to decrease its specific growth rate. Control over flux by a species is also increased by addition of an inhibitor specific to that species and a method is proposed for determining experimentally the flux control coefficient for a species which can be inhibited in this manner.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-139-10-2309
1993-10-01
2021-10-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/139/10/mic-139-10-2309.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-139-10-2309&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. BAZIN M.J., SAUNDERS P.T. 1973; Dynamics of nitrification in a continuous flow system.. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 5:531–543
    [Google Scholar]
  2. FELL D. A. 1992; Metabolic Control Analysis: a survey of its theoretical and experimental development.. Biochemical Journal 286:313–330
    [Google Scholar]
  3. HARDER W., KUENEN J.G., MATIN A. 1977; A review: microbial selection in continuous culture.. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 43:1–24
    [Google Scholar]
  4. HEINRICH R., RAPOPORT T.A. 1974; A linear steady-state treatment of enzymatic chains.. European Journal of Biochemistry 42:89–95
    [Google Scholar]
  5. HEINRICH R., RAPOPORT S.M. 1983; Utility of mathematical models for the understanding of metabolic systems.. Biochemical Society Transactions 11:31–35
    [Google Scholar]
  6. KACSER H. 1983; The control of enzymes in vivo : elasticity analysis of the steady-state.. Biochemical Society Transactions 11:35–40
    [Google Scholar]
  7. KACSER H. 1988; Regulation and control of metabolic pathways.. In Physiological Models in Microbiology 1: pp. 1–23 Edited by Bazin M. J., Prosser J. I. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  8. KACSER H., BURNS J. 1973; The control of flux.. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 27:65–104
    [Google Scholar]
  9. KACSER H., BURNS J. 1979; Molecular democracy: who shares the controls?. Biochemical Society Transactions 7:1149–1160
    [Google Scholar]
  10. KELL D.B., WESTERHOF H.V. 1986; Metabolic control theory: its role in microbiology and biotechnology.. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 39:305–320.8
    [Google Scholar]
  11. MEGEE R.D., DRAKE J.F., FREDRICKSON A.G., TSUCHIYA H.M. 1972; Studies in intermicrobial symbiosis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus casei.. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 18:1733–1742
    [Google Scholar]
  12. PIRT S.J. 1975 Principles of Microbe and Cell Cultivation. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications;
    [Google Scholar]
  13. PORTEOUS J.W. 1985; Enzyme catalysis and fluxes in metabolic systems. Why control of such fluxes is shared among all components of the system.. In Circulation,Respiration and Metabolism pp. 263–277 Edited by Gilles R. Berlin: Springer-Verlag;
    [Google Scholar]
  14. SAUNDERS P.T. 1983; Catastrophe theory.. In Mathematical Models in Microbiology pp. 105–138 Edited by Bazin M. J. London: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  15. WILLIAMS F.M. 1980; On understanding predator-prey interactions.. In Contemporary Microbial Ecology pp. 349–375 Edited by Ellwood D. C., Hedger J. N., Latham M. J., Lynch J. M., Slater J. H. London: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-139-10-2309
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-139-10-2309
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error