The Hexokinase Isoenzyme PII of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a Protein Kinase

References

1. Anderson D.J., Blobel G. 1983; Immunoprecipitation of proteins from cell-free translations. Methods of Enzymology 96:111–120
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bennett M.K., Kennedy M.B. 1987; Deduced primary structure of the β subunit of brain type II Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase determined by molecular cloning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 84:1794–1798
   [Google Scholar]
3. Carlson M., Osmond B.C., Neigeborn L., Bonstein D. 1984; A suppressor of snfl mutations causes constitutive high-level invertase synthesis in yeast. Genetics 107:19–32
   [Google Scholar]
4. Celenza J.L., Carlson M. 1986; A yeast gene that is essential for release from glucose repression encodes a protein kinase. Science 233:1175–1180
   [Google Scholar]
5. Entian K.-D. 1986; Glucose repression: a complex regulatory system in yeast. Microbiological Sciences 3:366–371
   [Google Scholar]
6. Entian K.-D., Frohlich K.U. 1984; Saccharo- myces cerevisiae mutants provide evidence of hexokinase PII as a bifunctional enzyme with catalytic and regulatory domains for triggering carbon catabolite repression. Journal of Bacteriology 158:29–35
   [Google Scholar]
7. Entian K.-D., Mecke D. 1982; Genetic evidence for a role of hexokinase isoenzyme PII in carbon catabolite repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Journal of Biological Chemistry 257:870–874
   [Google Scholar]
8. Eraso P., Gancedo J.M. 1984; Catabolite repression in yeast is not associated with low levels of cAMP. European Journal of Biochemistry 141:195–198
   [Google Scholar]
9. Fernández R., Herrero P., Moreno F. 1985; Inhibition and inactivation of glucose-phosphorylating enzymes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by d-xylose. Journal of General Microbiology 131:2705–2709
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fernández R., Herrero P., Fernández M.T., Moreno F. 1986; Mechanism of inactivation of hexokinase P1I of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by d- xylose. Journal of General Microbiology 132:3467–3472
    [Google Scholar]
11. Fernández T., Herrero P., Lopez-Boado Y.S., Fernández R., Moreno F. 1987; Proteolysis of hexokinase PII is not the triggering signal of carbon catabolite derepression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Journal of General Microbiology 133:2509–2516
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fernández R., Herrero P., Fernández E., Fernandez M.T., Lopez-Boado Y.S., Moreno F. 1988; Autophosphorylation of yeast hexokinase PII. Journal of General Microbiology 134:2493–2498
    [Google Scholar]
13. Francois J., VanSchaftingen E., Hers H.-G. 1984; The mechanism by which glucose increases fructose 2,6-bisphosphate concentration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A cyclic-AMP-dependent activation of phosphofructokinase 2. European Journal of Biochemistry 145:187–193
    [Google Scholar]
14. Frøhlich K.U., Entian K.D., Mecke D. 1984; Cloning and restriction analysis of the hexokinase PII gene of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Molecular and General Genetics 194:144–148
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fröhlich K.U., Entian K.D., Mecke D. 1985; The primary structure of the yeast hexokinase PII gene (HXK2) which is responsible for glucose repression. Gene 36:105–111
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gancedo J.M., Gancedo C. 1986; Catabolite repression mutants of yeast. FEMS Microbiology Letters 32:179–187
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hunter T., Cooper J.A. 1985; Protein-tyrosine kinases. Annual Review of Biochemistry 54:897–930
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kamps M.P., Taylor S.S., Sefton B.M. 1986; Direct evidence that oncogenic tyrosine kinases and cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase have homologous ATP-binding sites. Nature London: 310:589–592
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kitazume Y., Ycas M., Vincent W.S. 1962; Metabolic properties of a ribonucleic acid fraction in yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 48:265–269
    [Google Scholar]
20. Knopf J.L., Lee M., Sultzman L.A., Kriz R.W., Loomis C.R., Hewick R.M., Bell R.M. 1986; Cloning and expression of multiple protein kinase C cDNAs. Cell 46:491–502
    [Google Scholar]
21. Matsumoto K., Uno I., Ishikawa T., Oshima Y. 1983; Cyclic AMP may not be involved in catabolite repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae:evidence from mutants unable to synthesize it. Journal of Bacteriology 158:898–900
    [Google Scholar]
22. Michels C.A., Halmenberger K.M., Silvestre Y. 1983; Pleiotropic mutations regulating resis- tence to glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are allelic to the structural gene for hexokinase B. Journal of Bacteriology 153:574–578
    [Google Scholar]
23. Ouchterlony O., Nilsson L.A. 1978 Handbook of Experimental Immunology, 3rd edn,. pp 1–19 Weir D.H. Edited by Weir, Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications;
    [Google Scholar]
24. Parker P.J., Coussens L., Totty N., Rhee L., Young S., Chen E., Stabel S., Waterfield M.D., Ullrich A. 1986; The complete primary structure of protein kinase C - the major phorbol ester receptor. Science 233:853–859
    [Google Scholar]
25. Sarokin L., Carlson M. 1984; Upstream region required for regulated expression of the glucose- repressibleSUC2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Molecular and Cellular Biology 4:2750–2757
    [Google Scholar]
26. Stachelek C., Stachelek J., Swan J., Bostein D., Konigsberg W. 1986; Identification, cloning and sequence determination of the genes specifying hexokinase A and B from yeast. Nucleic Acid Research 14:945–963
    [Google Scholar]
27. Zimmermann F.K., Scheel I. 1977; Mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae resistant to carbon catabolite repression. Molecular and General Genetics 154:75–82
    [Google Scholar]