1887

Abstract

Toxic effects of both main colicin types, i.e. of porin and nuclease types, involve the direct contact of their molecules with the plasma membrane of sensitive cells. In the present study, it was tested whether this contact provokes a lateral or vertical movement of intramembrane protein particles (IMP) or a direct cleavage of the proteins. IMP were visualized by freeze-fracturing and electron microscopy on the protoplasmic fracture face (PF) of colicin-treated cells of Possible changes in distribution and in density of IMP due to treatment with colicins E1-E7 and K were followed. As a control, the bacteria were equilibrated at 0C before quenching, which caused a reversible formation of smooth areas and a decrease in the mean density of IMP on the PF. Colicins E1-E7 had no clear-cut effect on the disposition of IMP. Only colicin K decreased the IMP density, by 10% in strain 58–161 and by 17% in strain C6; the distribution of IMP remained homogeneous. Trypsin reactivation of colicin-K-inactivated bacteria was not reflected by restoration of the original density of IMP; on the contrary, it led to a further decrease, of 1–13%, in IMP density, presumably by proteolytic cleavage. Varying densities of IMP in different strains of the same bacterial species (under standard conditions) were confirmed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-134-5-1283
1988-05-01
2022-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/134/5/mic-134-5-1283.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-134-5-1283&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Arancia U., Valente L. K., Crater P. T. 1980; Effect of glutaraldehyde and glycerol on freeze-fractured Escherichia coli. Journal of Microscopy 118:161–176
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Branton D. 1969; Membrane structure. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 20:209–238
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Branton D., Bullivant S., Gilula N. B., Karnovsky M. J., Moor H., Mühlethaler K., Northcote D. H., Packer L., Satir B., Satir P., Speth V., Staehelin L. A., Steere R. L., Weinstein R. S. 1975; Freeze-etching nomenclature. Science 190:54–56
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Konisky J. 1982; Colicins and other bacteriocins with established modes of action. Annual Review of Microbiology 36:125–144
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kopecky A. L., Copeland D. P., Lusk J. E. 1975; Viability of Escherichia coli treated with colicin K. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 72:4631–4634
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Matsusaka T., Ishida A. 1977; A freeze-fracture study on the membrane-associated particles of aerobically and anaerobically grown Escherichia coli. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology 23:275–277
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Mühlethaler K., Moor H., Szarkowski J. W. 1965; The ultrastructure of the chloroplast lamellae. Planta 67:305–323
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Nečas O., Svoboda A., Pivničková E. 1981; Plasma membrane particles in yeast protoplasts. Acta histochemica suppl 23:151–155
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Niedermeyer W., Parish G. R., Moor H. 1976; The elasticity of the yeast cell tonoplast related to its ultrastructure and chemical composition. I. Induced swelling and shrinking; a freeze-etch membrane study. Cytobiology 13:364–379
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Nomura M. 1963; Mode of action o concines. cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 28:315–324
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Pugsley A. P. 1984a; The ins and outs of colicins. Part I. Production, and translocation across membranes. Microbiological Sciences 1:168–175
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Pugsley A. P. 1984b; The ins and outs of colicins. Part II. Lethal action, immunity and ecological implications. Microbiological Sciences 1:203–205
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Remsen C. C., Hess W. M., Sassen M. M. 1967; Fine structure of germinating Penicillium megasporum conidia. Protoplasma 64:439–451
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ringrose P. 1970; Sedimentation analysis of DNA degradation products resulting from the action of colicin E2 on Escherichia coli. Biochimica et biophysica acta 213:320–334
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Senior B. W., Holland I. B. 1971; Effect of colicin E3 upon the 30S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 68:959–963
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Šmarda J. 1978 The Effects of Colicins Brno: J. E. Purkyně University;
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Šmarda J., Obdržálek V. 1981; Staphylococcins: incidence and some characteristics of antibiotic action. In Staphylococci and Staphylococcal Infections pp. 407–411 Jeljaszewicz J. Edited by Stuttgart & New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag;
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Šmarda J., Uher P., Osecký P., Šmarda, Jaroslav. 1988; Modes of action of colicins E4-E7: rates of basic biosyntheses inhibition. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Mikrobiologie und Hygiene (Abteilung A) in the Press
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Staehelin L. A. 1968; The interpretation of freeze-etched artificial and biological membranes. Journal of Ultrastructure Research 22:326–347
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-134-5-1283
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-134-5-1283
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error