1887

Abstract

Summary: Of seven plant viruses tested, all except tobacco mosaic showed the phenomenon of photoreactivation, i.e. plants exposed to visible light after inoculation with preparations partially inactivated by ultraviolet radiation produced more local lesions than plants kept in darkness. Five strains of tobacco mosaic virus, which differed widely in their pathogenicity and other properties, were tested, but none showed the phenomenon. Of the six viruses that did, potato showed it much the most strongly, tomato bushy stunt and a tobacco necrosis virus the least; cabbage black ringspot, cucumber mosaic and tobacco ringspot were intermediate.

Photoreactivation does not occur immediately after plants are inoculated. With irradiated preparations of potato virus X, most particles need about 30 min. to reach the state in which their ability to infect is affected by light; once in this state, exposure to daylight for 15 min. gives almost complete photoreactivation. Some irradiated particles respond to light of 80 f.c., but others need brighter light; no additional response occurs when light intensity is increased above 600 f.c. The sensitive state of potato virus X persists for about 1 hr. in plants kept in darkness, after which the particles seem to be permanently inactivated.

With antibodies and enzymes, a constant amount of absorbed energy decreases the activity of a unit weight by a given fraction. This rule does not apply to plant viruses, which lose infectivity with less absorbed energy than the rule predicts. If viruses are more sensitive because they contain nucleic acid, their sensitivity is not a direct function of their content of nucleic acid. Potato virus X has the same nucleic acid content as strains of tobacco mosaic virus, but is inactivated by less absorbed energy and individual strains of tobacco mosaic virus also differ by factors of two in the amount of radiation needed to decrease their infectivity by a given fraction.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-13-2-370
1955-10-01
2021-08-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/13/2/mic-13-2-370.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-13-2-370&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bawden F.C., Kleczkowski A. 1948; Variations in the properties of potato virus X and their effects on its interactions with ribonuclease and proteolytic enzymes. J. gen. Microbiol. 2:173
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bawden F.C., Kleczkowski A. 1952; Ultra-violet injury to higher plants counteracted by visible light. Nature; Lond.: 16990
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bawden F.C., Kleczkowski A. 1953; The behaviour of some plant viruses after exposure to ultraviolet radiation. J. gen. Microbiol. 8:145
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bawden F.C., Roberts F.M. 1948; Photosynthesis and predisposition of plants to infection with certain viruses. Ann. appl. Biol. 35:418
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Casterman C., Jeener R. 1955; Sur le mécanisme de l’inhibition par la ribonucléase de la multiplication du virus de la mosaïque du tabae. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 16:433
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dulbecco R. 1950; Experiments on photoreactivation of bacteriophages inactivated by ultraviolet radiation. J. Bact. 59:329
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ginoza W., Atkinson D.E., Wildman S.G. 1954; A differential ability of tobacco mosaic virus to bind host-cell nucleoprotein. Science, 119:269
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hershey A.D., Chase M. 1952; Independent functions of viral protein and nucleic acid in growth of bacteriophage. J. gen. Physiol. 36:39
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kelner A. 1949; Photoreactivation of ultraviolet-treated Escherichia coli, with special reference to the dose-reduction principle and the ultraviolet-induced mutations. J. Bact. 58:511
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kelner A. 1951; Action spectra for photoreactivation of ultraviolet-irradiated Escherichia coli and Streptomyces griseus. . J. gen. Physiol. 34:835
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kleczkowski A. 1946; Combination between different proteins and between proteins and yeast nucleic acid. Biochem. J. 40: 677
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kleczkowski A. 1954a; Stability of chymotrypsin and tobacco mosaic virus decreased by ultraviolet radiation. Biochem. J. 56:345
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kleczkowski A. 1954b; Inactivation of antibodies by ultraviolet radiation. Brit. J. exp. Path. 35:402
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kleczkowski J., Kleczkowski A. 1953; The behaviour of Rhizobium bacteriophages during and after exposure to ultraviolet radiation. J. gen. Microbiol. 8:135
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kleczkowski J., Kleczkowski A. 1954; The effect of ribonuclease on phage- host interaction. J. gen. Microbiol. 11:451
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Loring H.S. 1942; The reversible inactivation of tobacco mosaic virus by crystalline ribonuclease. J. gen. Physiol. 25:497
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Mclaren A.D., Gentile P., Kirk D., Levin N.A. 1953; Photochemistry of proteins. XVII. Inactivation of enzymes with ultraviolet light and photolysis of the peptide bond. J. Polym. Sci. 10: 333
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-13-2-370
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-13-2-370
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error