1887

Abstract

Summary: A soap-tolerant organism, commonly found in face-flannels and sponges, was compared with var. and . These organisms have many characters in common. It is proposed that and related organisms should be included in the family Achromobacteriaceae and that the soap-tolerant organism be considered a new variety of with the provisional name var. . Some problems of classification of these and similar organisms are discussed.

The soap-tolerant organism had two major antigens; one was associated with the capsule and largely strain specific, the other was common to all strains and was present also in non-capsulated variants. Both antigens were detached from the cell on heating, the specific antigen partially and the common antigen almost completely; they could be demonstrated in the saline medium after suspensions had been heated at 100° for 60 min. and though detached from the cell, could still stimulate antibody formation. There was an antigenic relationship between the soap tolerant organisms and .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-13-2-252
1955-10-01
2022-01-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/13/2/mic-13-2-252.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-13-2-252&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abd-El-Malek Y., Gibson T. 1952; Studies in the bacteriology of milk. IV. The Gram-negative rods of milk. J. Dairy Res. 19:294
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Audureau A. 1940; Étude du genre Moraxella. . Ann. Inst.Pasteur 64:126
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bord G.G.De. 1939; Organisms invalidating the diagnosis of gonorrhoea by the smear method. J. Bact. 38:119
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bord G.G.De. 1942; Descriptions of Mimeae trib. nov. with three genera and three species and two new species of Neisseria from conjunctivitis and vaginitis. Iowa St. Coll. J. Sei. 16:471
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bray P.T., Cruickshank J.C. 1943; Meningitis due to Diplococcus mucosus. . Brit. med. J. i:601
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brisou J. 1953; Essai sur la systématique du genre Achromobacter. . Ann. Inst.Pasteur 86:812
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brisou J., Morichau-Beauchant R. 1952; Identité biochimique entre certaines souches de B. anitratum et Moraxella lwoffi. . Ann. Inst. Pasteur 82:640
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chilton M.L., Fulton M. 1946; Presumptive media for differentiating paracolon and Salmonella cultures. J. Lab. clin. Med. 31:824
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Christensen W.B. 1946; Urea decomposition as a means of differentiating Proteus and paracolon cultures from each other and from Salmonella and Shigella types. J. Bact. 52:461
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cowan S.T. 1938; Unusual infections following cerebral operations. With a description of Diplococcus mucosus (von Lingelsheim). Lancet ii:1052
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Felix A. 1952; The properties of different Salmonella Vi antigens. J. Hyg., Camb. 50:515
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ferguson W.W., Roberts L.F. 1950; A bacteriological and serological study of organism B 5 W (Bacterium anitratum). . J. Bact. 59:171
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hugh R., Leifson E. 1953; The taxonomic significance of fermentative versus oxidative metabolism of carbohydrates by various Gram-negative bacteria. J. Bact. 60:24
    [Google Scholar]
  14. International Bacteriological Code of Nomenclature 1948 Buchanan R. E., St John-Brooks R., Breed R. S. Ed. by J. Bact. 55287
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Judicial Commission 1953; Minutes of the Judicial Commission meetings held at Rome in connection with the VI International Congress for Microbiology, September 1953. Minute 9. Int. Bull. Bact. Norn. Tax. 3153
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lingelsheim W.Von. 1906; Die bakteriologischen Arbeiten der Kgl. Hygienischen Station zu Beuthen O. Schl, während der Genickstarreepidemie in Oberschlesien im Winter 1904/5. Klin. Jb. 15:373
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lingelsheim W.Von. 1908; Beiträge zur Ätiologie der epidemischen Genickstarre nach den Ergebnissen der letzten Jahre. Z. Hyg. InfektKr. 59:457
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Mcfarlan A.M. 1941; Diplococcus mucosus von Lingelsheim. A description of a strain with comments on the systematic position of the organism. J.Path. Bact. 53:446
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Piéchaud D., Piéchaud M., Second L. 1951; Étude de 26 souches de Moraxella lwoffi. . Ann. Inst. Pasteur 80:97
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Schaub I.G., Hauber F.E. 1948; A biochemical and serological study of a group of identical Gram-negative bacilli from human sources. J.Bact. 56:379
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Seeliger H. 1953; Zur Systematik des Bacterium anitratum (Schaub & Hauber). Zbl. Bakt. Abt.1.Orig. 159:173
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Simmons J.S. 1926; A culture medium for differentiating organisms of colon-typhoid-aerogenes groups and for isolation of certain fungi. J.infect. Dis. 39:209
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Stuart C.A., Formal S., Mcgann V. 1949; Further studies on B 5 W, an anaerogenic group in the Enterobaderiaceae. . J. infect. Dis. 84:235
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Stuart C.A., Kennedy E.R. 1948; Thermostability and alcohol solubility of Vi antigen. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y. 68455
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-13-2-252
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-13-2-252
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error