The Isolation and Classification of Proteolytic Bacteria from the Rumen of the Sheep

References

1. Annison E. F., Chalmers M. I., Marshall S. B. M., Synge R. L. M. 1954; Ruminal ammonia formation in relation to the protein requirement of sheep. III. Ruminal ammonia formation with various diets.. J. agric. Sci. 44:270
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology., 6th. 1948 Breed R. S., Murray E. G. D., Hitchens A. P. Edited by London:: Baillière, Tindall and Cox.;
3. Bryant M. P., Burkey L. A. 1953a; Cultural methods and some characteristics of some of the more numerous groups of bacteria in the bovine rumen.. J. Dairy Sci. 36:205
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bryant M. P., Burkey L. A. 1953b; Numbers and some predominant groups of bacteria in the rumen of cows fed different rations.. J. Dairy Sci. 36:218
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chalmers M.I., Cuthbertson D.P., Synge R.L.M. 1954a; Ruminal ammonia formation in relation to the protein requirement of sheep. I. Duodenal administration and heat processing as factors influencing fate of casein supplements.. J. agric. Sci. 44:254
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chalmers M.I., Cuthbertson D.P., Synge R.L.M. 1954b; Ruminal ammonia formation in relation to the protein requirement of sheep. II. Comparison of casein and herring-meal supplements.. J. agric. Sci. 44:263
   [Google Scholar]
7. Gibson T. 1944; A study of Bacillus subtilis and related organisms.. J. Dairy Res. 13:248
   [Google Scholar]
8. Gibson T., Abdel-Malek Y. 1945; The formation of carbon-dioxide by lactic acid bacteria and Bacillus licheniformis and a cultural method of detecting the process.. J. Dairy Res. 14:35
   [Google Scholar]
9. Gutierrez J. 1953; Numbers and characteristics of lactate utilizing organisms in the rumen of cattle.. J. Bact. 53:123
   [Google Scholar]
10. Huhtanen C.N., Gall L.S. 1953a; Rumen organisms. I. Curved rods and a related rod type.. J. Bact. 65:548
    [Google Scholar]
11. Huhtanen C.N., Gall L.S. 1953b; Rumen organisms. II. Two lactate utilizers and six miscellaneous types.. J. Bact. 65:554
    [Google Scholar]
12. Huhtanen C.N., Rogers M.R., Gall L.S. 1952; Improved techniques for isolating and purifying rumen organisms.. J. Bact. 64:17
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hungate R.E. 1950; The anaerobic mesophilic cellulolytic bacteria.. Bact. Rev. 14:1
    [Google Scholar]
14. Knight B.C.J.C., Proom H. 1950; A comparative survey of the nutrition and physiology of mesophylic species in the genus Bacillus.. J. gen. Microbiol. 4:508
    [Google Scholar]
15. McDonald I.W. 1952; The role of ammonia in ruminal digestion of protein.. Biochem. J. 51:86
    [Google Scholar]
16. McGaughey C.A., Chu H.P. 1948; The egg-yolk reaction of aerobic sporing bacilli.. J. gen. Microbiol. 2:334
    [Google Scholar]
17. MacPherson M.J. 1953; Isolation and identification of amylolytic streptococci from the rumen of the sheep.. J. Path. Bact. 66:95
    [Google Scholar]
18. Mann S.O., Masson F.M., Oxford A.E. 1954; Facultative anaerobic bacteria from the sheep’s rumen.. J. gen. Microbiol. 10:142
    [Google Scholar]
19. Mann S.O., Oxford A.E. 1954; Studies of some presumptive lactobacilli isolated from the rumens of young calves.. J. gen. Microbiol. 11:83
    [Google Scholar]
20. Orla-Jensen S. 1919 The Lactic Acid Bacteria. Copenhagen:: A. F.Host and Son.;
    [Google Scholar]
21. Shaw C., Stitt J.M., Cowan S.T. 1951; Staphylococci and their classification.. J. gen. Microbiol. 5:1010
    [Google Scholar]
22. Smith N.R., Gordon R.E., Clark F.E. 1946 Aerobic mesophilic sporeforming bacteria. Misc. Publ. U.S. Dep. Agric.:559
    [Google Scholar]
23. Sym E.A. 1938; Hydrolasenwirkung des Blindsackinhaltes des Pferdes und des Panseninhaltes des Rindes. I. Teil Einleitung, allgemeine Methoden und pro- teolytische Wirkungen.. Acta Biol, exp., Varsovie 12:192–352
    [Google Scholar]